Fornication, Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation and Multiculturalism

‘Idolatry of King Solomon’ -Frans Francken II

It is clear from many factors that the story of Scripture is about one single race and its struggles against both moral and racial corruption at the hands of evil. Here I will not discuss the origination of this struggle at any length as I have undertaken that endeavour elsewhere.

‘The Origins of the Non-Adamic Races’

‘Adam: The Patriarch of One Race’

‘The Origins of the Serpent Seed’

My purpose here will be to point out and explain some of the instances in Scripture where we recieve instruction and information regarding our obligation to our Father to remain separate from the other races so that we may remain in his image.

It is obvious from many passages of Scripture that the ideal is to marry someone of one’s own race and ethnic kindred. This is exemplified by the fathers as seen in Genesis 24 where we read that Abraham desires for Isaac to marry a woman of his own tribe.

“1And Abraam was old, advanced in days, and the Lord blessed Abraam in all things. 2And Abraam said to his servant the elder of his house, who had rule over all his possessions, Put thy hand under my thigh, 3and I will adjure thee by the Lord the God of heaven, and the God of the earth, that thou take not a wife for my son Isaac from the daughters of the Chananites, with whom I dwell, in the midst of them. 4But thou shalt go instead to my country, where I was born, and to my tribe, and thou shalt take from thence a wife for my son Isaac.”
-Genesis 24

Isaac’s son Esau would not follow in his father’s footsteps but rather would forsake his heritage and take wives of the mongrelized Canaanite tribes.

“34And Esau was forty years old; and he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beoch the Chettite, and Basemath, daughter of Helon the Chettite. 35And they were provoking to Isaac and Rebecca.”
-Genesis 26

Rebecca was so saddened at Esau’s fornication that she saw no worth in living if Jacob too would marry racial aliens like Esau did.

“46And Rebecca said to Isaac, I am weary of my life, because of the daughters of the sons of Chet; if Jacob shall take a wife of the daughters of this land, wherefore should I live?”
-Genesis 27

At Isaac’s behest Jacob went to his uncle Laban (meaning “White”, Strong’s and Gesenius’ s.v.) to find his kindred wives Rachel and Leah who would bear children of the promise.

“1And Isaac called Jacob, and blessed him, and charged him, saying: Take not a wife of the stock of Chanaan: 2But go, and take a journey to Mesopotamia of Syria, to the house of Bathuel, thy mother’s father, and take thee a wife thence of the daughters of Laban, thy uncle. 3And God almighty bless thee, and make thee to increase and multiply thee: that thou mayst be a multitude of people. 4And give the blessings of Abraham to thee, and to thy seed after thee: that thou mayst possess the land of thy sojournment, which he promised to thy grandfather. 5And when Isaac had sent him away, he took his journey and went to Mesopotamia of Syria, to Laban, the son of Bathuel, the Syrian, brother to Rebecca, his mother.”
-Genesis 28

The example of Jacob’s imperative to marry a woman of his mother’s tribe refutes the common argument that miscegenation was only forbidden on religious grounds. The truth is that Laban’s family was pagan (Genesis 31.19-35) as their Hebrew forebears were before the time of Abraham (Joshua 24.2, 15). If Jacob’s parents were only concerned about their son’s religious integrity they would not have sent him to take a pagan wife. If race was of no concern he may as well have married a Canaanite like his brother. It is thus evident that their concern was for their racial posterity.

The Levitical priesthood was held to a very high standard concerning ethnic homogeneity. While other Israelites were permitted on occasion to marry between Israelite tribes and even sometimes to take wives of Adamic nations apart from Israel, the Levites were commanded to marry Levite women.

“13He shall take for a wife a virgin of his own tribe. 14But a widow, or one that is put away, or profaned, or a harlot, these he shall not take; but he shall take for a wife a virgin of his own people. 15And he shall not profane his seed among his people: I am the Lord that sanctifies him.”
-Leviticus 21

The ideal of homogeneity is also encoded in other Levitical laws concerning the day to day lives of the Israelites. These serve as reminders of Israel’s duty to remain pure and set apart from the other nations.

“19 Keep ye my laws. Thou shalt not make thy cattle to gender with beasts of any other kind. Thou shalt not sow thy field with different seeds. Thou shalt not wear a garment that is woven of two sorts.”
-Leviticus 19

The following passage from the deuterocanonical book the Wisdom of Sirach sheds light on a deeper meaning of this Levitical law regarding the sowing of seed. It is not just a rule for agricultural practice.

“19 My son, keep the flower of thine age sound; and give not thy strength to strangers. 20 When thou hast gotten a fruitful possession through all the field, sow it with thine own seed, trusting in the goodness of thy stock. 21 So thy race which thou leavest shall be magnified, having the confidence of their good descent.”
-Sirach 26

The importance of racial purity is emphasized in other deuterocanonical or apocryphal sources. While these sources are not primary canonical Scriptures they surely do indicate to us that ancient Judaeans and early Christians understood the importance of racial purity and separatism. 

In the apocryphal book of 4 Maccabees the ideal wife is exemplified as a virgin Israelite untainted by miscegenation who cares for her Adamic posterity. 

“7 And the righteous mother of the seven children spake also as follows to her offspring: I was a pure virgin, and went not beyond my father’s house; but I took care of the built-up rib [Adam’s rib]. 8 No destroyer of the desert, or ravisher of the plain, injured me; nor did the destructive, deceitful snake, make spoil of my chaste virginity; and I remained with my husband during the period of my prime.”
-4 Maccabees 18

In Tobit chapter 4 Tobit advises his son to marry a wife of his own tribe and to stay away from whores and foreigners. He offers Noah, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as examples of men who married within their own tribe and for that reason they and their seed are blessed.

“12 Beware of all whoredom, my son, and chiefly take a wife of the seed of thy fathers, and take not a strange woman to wife, which is not of thy father’s tribe: for we are the children of the prophets, Noe, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob: remember, my son, that our fathers from the beginning, even that they all married wives of their own kindred, and were blessed in their children, and their seed shall inherit the land. 13 Now therefore, my son, love thy brethren, and despise not in thy heart thy brethren, the sons and daughters of thy people, in not taking a wife of them: for in pride is destruction and much trouble, and in lewdness is decay and great want: for lewdness is the mother of famine.”
-Tobit 4

In the Second Temple there was a common Greek Inscription known as the Warning Inscription which condemns racial aliens who trespass in the Temple to death. 

“No stranger [allogene, Strong’s G241 meaning literally “of another race”] is to enter within the balustrade round the temple and enclosure. Whoever is caught will be himself responsible for his ensuing death.” 

At Deuteronomy 23.2 we read that a mamzer (“bastard” in the King James, Strong’s H4464) is excluded from the congregation.

“2 A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord.”
-Deuteronomy 23

Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance defines mamzer thusly:

From an unused root meaning to alienate; a mongrel, i.e. Born of a Jewish [sic. Israelite] father and a heathen mother — bastard.”

The first component of mamzer is the root mam meaning “to stain” which according to Gesenius is the root of the noun muwm (H3971) meaning “blemish” or “spot”. While Strong’s does not offer an entry for the root mam Gesenius does on page 445 where he offers the meaning “to stain” or “to disfigure”.

In Gesenius’ Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon at the end of the entry for mamzer we read that some scholars take mamzer from zuwr (H2114) meaning to “turn aside”, “be a stranger”, “go away” or “come from another place” and Strong’s tells us the root of mamzer means “to alienate”. Thus the full literal meaning of mamzer must be “strange/foreign/alien blemish/stain/spot”.

While we are not bound to the Mosaic Law as Christians under the New Covenant, the exclusion of mongrels from the elect is a timeless part of God’s Law which is evident in Genesis before the Law of Moses.

‘Against the Judaizers’ https://teknatoutheou.home.blog/2020/08/24/against-the-judaizers/

For this reason we see in Genesis 38 that Zerah and Pharez contended for the status of firstborn (vv. 27-30) despite the fact that Judah already had a son, Shelah (vv. 1-5).

The reason that Shelah was not acceptable as the firstborn of Judah can only be that he was a mamzer because his mother was “a daughter of a certain Canaanite” (vs. 2) of the same cursed stock as Esau’s wives which is certainly not welcome in the house of the Lord (Zechariah 14.21).

Even in the time of Noah mongrels were excluded from the election. Noah was chosen to preserve the Adamic race because he was “perfect in his race” (Genesis 6.9, genea, Strong’s G1074 meaning “race, stock, family” [Liddell and Scott s.v.] or “men of the same stock, a family” [Thayer s.v.]) and his wife and sons were certainly of the same stock (Tobit 4.12).

The only other Biblical occurrance of mamzer is at Zechariah 9.6 where we see the prophecy of God’s wrath on various Adamic nations. In the Greek text of Zechariah 9.6 in the Septuagint mamzer is translated allogeneis (G241) which means “of another race” (Liddell and Scott s.v.) or “sprung from another race” (Thayer s.v.). Zechariah of course refers to a mongrel race that would make an end of the Philistines of Ashdod. Quoting from the New American Standard Bible which renders mamzer accurately:

“6 And a mongrel race will dwell in Ashdod, And I will cut off the pride of the Philistines.”
-Zechariah 9

Likewise elsewhere in Scripture we see that entire Adamic nations had been given over to mongrelization in Old Testament times starting with the Hamitic tribes of Northern Africa, the Horn of Africa and Southern Arabia.

“For I am the Lord thy God, the Holy One of Israel, thy Saviour: I gave Egypt for thy ransom, Ethiopia and Seba for thee.”
-Isaiah 43.3

It seems God placed these Hamites between Israel and the non-Adamic Nilotic Congoid tribes who had begun to soil the Adamic blood of Northern Africa, the Horn of Africa and Southern Arabia. Note that Ethiopia and Egypt exist as nations (in the deracinated modern sense), but that God no longer counts them among the nations because they are all demonic hybrids today.

‘Concerning the Ancient Aethiops’

God promised He would make a full end of the nations among whom the Israelites were dispersed. Foremost among these were Assyria, Babylon, and Persia which are all home to mongrel races today as are Egypt, Seba, Ethiopia, Ashdod and the whole land of old Philistia.

“28Fear not thou, my servant Jacob, saith the Lord; for I am with thee: she that was without fear and in luxury, has been delivered up: for I will make a full end of every nation among whom I have thrust thee forth; but I will not cause thee to fail: yet will I chastise thee in the way of judgment, and will not hold thee entirely guiltless.”
-Jeremiah 46

Israel was the only nation in the whole Adamic world to whom God had explicitly promised preservation until the last days. Thus we have much in Scripture to teach us the importance of racial posterity. Of course it has been a struggle for us and so we have also recieved many admonitions for fornicating with the mongrelized nations.

Here the prophet Jeremiah speaks of the whoredom of Israel representing the racial nation of Israel as vine. Plant life used to symbolize people, families, nations and races is a very common idiom in Scripture. Notice that the result of their fornication is a stain that cannot be washed away which well describes the darkening inflicted upon mongrel offspring.

“20For of old thou hast broken thy yoke, and plucked asunder thy bands; and thou has said, I will not serve thee, but will go upon every high hill, and under every shady tree, there will I indulge in my fornication.

21Yet I planted thee a fruitful vine, entirely of the right sort: how art thou a strange vine turned to bitterness!

22Though thou shouldest wash thyself with nitre, and multiply to thyself soap, still thou art stained by thine iniquities before me, saith the Lord.”
-Jeremiah 2

We see in the previous passage in Jeremiah that miscegenation is connected with idolatry which was practiced on the high places and in groves. In ancient Canaan the pagan cults to gods such as Astarte and Baal were inextricably linked to fertility rites and temple prostitution. Thus to worship these idols was to be joined to the mongrel Canaanites in fornication.


Here in Ezekiel we see the act of idolatry itself described as an act of fornication with strangers. The house of fornication mentioned here is undoubtedly a pagan temple in which sexual rites were performed with racial aliens.

“23And it came to pass after all thy wickedness, saith the Lord, 24that thou didst build thyself a house of fornication, and didst make thyself a public place in every street; 25and on the head of every way thou didst set up thy fornications, and didst defile thy beauty, and didst open thy feet to every passer by, and didst multiply thy fornication.”
-Ezekiel 16

The prophet Isaiah too describes idolatry as an act of adultery with other nations beyond Israel’s borders. Israel is symbolized here as a harlot who makes her bed in the high places of pagan worship.

“3But draw ye near hither, ye lawless children, the seed of adulterers and the harlot.

4Wherein have ye been rioting? and against whom have ye opened your mouth, and against whom have ye loosed your tongue? are ye not children of perdition? a lawless seed?

5who call upon idols under the leafy trees, slaying your children in the valleys among the rocks?

6That is thy portion, this is thy lot: and to them hast thou poured forth drink-offerings, and to these hast thou offered meat-offerings. Shall I not therefore be angry for these things?

7On a lofty and high mountain, there is thy bed, and thither thou carriedst up thy meat-offerings:

8and behind the posts of thy door thou didst place thy memorials. Didst thou think that if thou shouldest depart from me, thou wouldest gain? thou hast loved those that lay with thee;

9and thou hast multiplied thy whoredom with them, and thou hast increased the number of them that are far from thee, and hast sent ambassadors beyond thy borders, and hast been debased even to hell.”
-Isaiah 57

In chapter 4 of Hosea Israel is rebuked for idolatry and fornication. Among other sins we see that they “mingle blood with blood” and have “chosen the Chananites”. This clearly refers to the miscegenation of the Israelites with the Canaanites as they shared in the heathen fertility rites with “polluted ones”.

“1Hear the word of the Lord, ye children of Israel: for the Lord has a controversy with the inhabitants of the land, because there is no truth, nor mercy, nor knowledge of God in the land.

2Cursing, and lying, and murder, and theft, and adultery abound in the land, and they mingle blood with blood.

3Therefore shall the land mourn, and shall be diminished with all that dwell in it, with the wild beasts of the field, and the reptiles of the earth, and with the birds of the sky, and the fish of the sea shall fail:

4that neither any one may plead, nor any one reprove another; but my people are as a priest spoken against.

5Therefore they shall fall by day, and the prophet with thee shall fall: I have compared thy mother unto night.

6My people are like as if they had no knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt not minister as priest to me: and as thou has forgotten the law of thy God, I also will forget thy children.

7According to their multitude, so they sinned against me: I will turn their glory into shame.

8They will devour the sins of my people, and will set their hearts on their iniquities.

9And the priest shall be as the people: and I will avenge on them their ways, and I will recompense to them their counsels.

10And they shall eat, and shall not be satisfied: they have gone a-whoring, and shall by no means prosper: because they have left off to take heed to the Lord.

11The heart of my people has gladly engaged in fornication and wine and strong drink.

12They asked counsel by means of signs, and they reported answer to them by their staves: they have gone astray in a spirit of whoredom, and gone grievously a-whoring from their God.

13They have sacrificed on the tops of the mountains, and on the hills they have sacrificed under the oak and poplar, and under the shady tree, because the shade was good: therefore your daughters shall go a-whoring, and your daughters-in-law shall commit adultery.

14And I will not visit upon your daughters when they shall commit fornication, nor your daughters-in-law when they shall commit adultery: for they themselves mingled themselves with harlots, and sacrificed with polluted ones, and the people that understood not entangled itself with a harlot.

15But thou, O Israel, be not ignorant, and go ye not, men of Juda, to Galgala; and go not up to the house of On, and swear not by the living Lord.

16For Israel was maddened like a mad heifer: now the Lord will feed them as a lamb in a wide place.

17Ephraim, joined with idols, has laid stumbling-blocks in his own way.

18He has chosen the Chananites: they have grievously gone a-whoring: they have loved dishonour through her insolence.

19Thou art a blast of wind in her wings, and they shall be ashamed because of their altars.”
-Hosea 4

Here in Numbers we see that Israelite men fornicated with the daughters of Moab and were drawn away to worship of their idols.

“1And Israel sojourned in Sattin, and the people profaned itself by going a-whoring after the daughters of Moab. 2And they called them to the sacrifices of their idols; and the people ate of their sacrifices, and worshipped their idols.”
-Numbers 25

One Israelite man even dared to flaunt his fornication before the assembly parading a Moabitess before the faithful of Israel who were greatly distraught at this vulgar display. Phineas was enraged by this and following them to the tent ran his spear through the copulating pair. For this zealous act God’s wrath was quieted and Phineas was blessed with a priesthood.

God knew that the idolatry and fornication of Israel would be a very destructive force and we are plagued by it and the results thereof to this day. Exodus issues this commandment and warning to Israel.

“13Ye shall destroy their altars, and break in pieces their pillars, and ye shall cut down their groves, and the graven images of their gods ye shall burn with fire. 14For ye shall not worship strange gods, for the Lord God, a jealous name, is a jealous God; 15lest at any time thou make a covenant with the dwellers on the land, and they go a whoring after their gods, and sacrifice to their gods, and they call thee, and thou shouldest eat of their feasts, 16and thou shouldest take of their daughters to thy sons, and thou shouldest give of thy daughters to their sons; and thy daughters should go a whoring after their gods, and thy sons should go a whoring after their gods.”
-Exodus 34

Again in Joshua we are warned what will come of mingling with the Canaanite nations who we failed to deal with as commanded.

“10One of you has chased a thousand, for the Lord our God, he fought for you, as he said to us. 11And take ye great heed to love the Lord our God. 12For if ye shall turn aside and attach yourselves to these nations that are left with you, and make marriages with them, and become mingled with them and they with you, 13know that the Lord will no more destroy these nations from before you; and they will be to you snares and stumbling-blocks, and nails in your heels, and darts in your eyes, until ye be destroyed from off this good land, which the Lord your God has given you.”
-Joshua 23

The Canaanites and their hybrid offspring have indeed been snares, stumbling-blocks, nails in our heels, and darts in our eyes leading us ever further into fornication through their multicultural agenda of White genocide.


There are several instances in Scripture where the act of adultery is associated with idolatry and the related sexual acts. The word adultery in these passages is translated from a group of words deriving from moichos (G3428 through 3432).

Moichos certainly does refer to extramarital sexual relations in many instances but it also often refers figuratively to idolatry and the related sexual acts. This is seen in Isaiah 57.3 (G3432), Jeremiah 5.7 (G3428), 9.2 (G3428), 13.27 (G3430), 23.14 (G3428), Hosea 4.2 (G3430), 4.13-14 (G3431), and several other passages.

Lexicon: Anglo-Græco-Latinum Novi Testamenti by Andrew Symson, provides under the entry “adulterer” for the Greek word moichos: “it maketh a confusion in families, through an illegitimate brood.” In Critica Sacra Edward Leigh says of the Greek word moichos: “nam familias confundit illegitima sobole,” which is translated “for it mingles families with an illegal race.”

In the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament the reputable German scholar of Greek Gerhard Kittel offers this definition under the entry for moicheuo: “of the intermingling of animals and men or of different races.” In A Patristic Greek Lexicon Geoffrey Hugo Lampe offers for the verb moichaomai the definition “adulterate”.

In Griechisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch Hjalmar Frisk defines the word moichaomai with the German word “verfälschen” which means to adulterate. In A Patristic Greek Lexicon Geoffrey Hugo Lampe defines the adjective moichozeuktikos thusly: “of or relating to an adulterous marriage.” An adulterous marriage you might ask? Is adultery not strictly an extramarital affair? Not according to all archaic uses of the word in English.

In A Greek and English Lexicon to the New Testament by John Parkhurst under the definition for moichalis, the author comments on Matthew 16.4: “Dr. Doddridge interprets [genea moichalis] ‘a spurious race degenerated…'”

In A Comprehensive Lexicon by John Pickering we find the following definition for the noun moichidios: “bastard, spurious.” Lexicon Manuale by Cornelius Schrevel, moichidios is defined in Latin by “adulterinus.” in the Oxford Latin Dictionary adulterinus is defined as “adulterated, impure.” and Lewis and Short add “not full-blooded.”

We can see from the definitions provided that moicheia is not strictly adultery against a spouse (Leviticus 20.10, Matthew 5.32, Mark 10.12 et al.) but also adulteration of racial stock. This of course ties in with the nature of idolatry and its associations with adultery and fornication. 

God’s covenant with Israel is portrayed in Scripture as a marriage covenant (Isaiah 54.1-4, Hosea 2.7, Jeremiah 31.32 et al.) and every instance of idolatry and fornication with the children of other gods is an act of adultery (Jeremiah 13.27, 3.8, Ezekiel 16.30-34 et al.). Thus for the people of God’s covenant to miscegenate is a transgression of the marriage covenant and the commandment; “thou shalt not commit adultery”.

Ezra 9 describes the error of Judah in taking Canaanite wives. We see that this mongrelization is a cause of great distress in Judah.

“1And when these things were finished, the princes drew near to me, saying, The people of Israel, and the priests, and the Levites, have not separated themselves from the people of the lands in their abominations, even the Chananite, the Ethite, the Pherezite, the Jebusite, the Ammonite, the Moabite, and the Moserite and the Amorite. 2For they have taken of their daughters for themselves and their sons; and the holy seed has passed among the nations of the lands, and the hand of the rulers has been first in this transgression.”
-Ezra 9

As we see today the rulers and priesthood were the ones who foremost transgressed in this manner. Today the churches have become cesspools of mongrelization, promoting interracial marriage and embracing non-Adamic races while the ministers eagerly promote this sin. In the following chapter we find the Judahites have a plan to repent and separate from the alien wives and their bastards.

“1So when Esdras had prayed, and when he had confessed, weeping and praying before the house of God, a very great assembly of Israel came together to him, men and women and youths; for the people wept, and wept aloud. 2And Sechenias the son of Jeel, of the sons of Elam, answered and said to Esdras, We have broken covenant with our God, and have taken strange wives of the nations of the land: yet now there is patience of hope to Israel concerning this thing. 3Now then let us make a covenant with our God, to put away all the wives, and their offspring, as thou shalt advise: 4arise, and alarm them with the commands of our God; and let it be done according to the law. Rise up, for the matter is upon thee; and we are with thee: be strong and do. 5Then Esdras arose, and caused the rulers, the priests, and Levites, and all Israel, to swear that they would do according to this word: and they swore. 6And Esdras rose up from before the house of God, and went to the treasury of Joanan the son of Elisub; he even went thither: he ate no bread, and drank no water; for he mourned over the unfaithfulness of them of the captivity. 7And they made proclamation throughout Juda and Jerusalem to all the children of the captivity, that they should assemble at Jerusalem, saying, 8Every one who shall not arrive within three days, as is the counsel of the rulers and the elders, all his substance shall be forfeited, and he shall be separated from the congregation of the captivity. 9So all the men of Juda and Benjamin assembled at Jerusalem within the three days. This was the ninth month: on the twentieth day of the month all the people sat down in the street of the house of the Lord, because of their alarm concerning the word, and because of the storm. 10And Esdras the priest arose, and said to them, Ye have broken covenant, and have taken strange wives, to add to the trespass of Israel. 11Now therefore give praise to the Lord God of our fathers, and do that which is pleasing in his sight: and separate yourselves from the peoples of the land, and from the strange wives. 12Then all the congregation answered and said, This thy word is powerful upon us to do it. 13But the people is numerous, and the season is stormy, and there is no power to stand without, and the work is more than enough for one day or for two; for we have greatly sinned in this matter. 14Let now our rulers stand, and for all those in our cities who have taken strange wives, let them come at appointed times, and with them elders from every several city, and judges, to turn away the fierce wrath of our God from us concerning this matter. 15Only Jonathan the son of Asael, and Jazias the son of Thecoe were with me concerning this; and Mesollam, and Sabbathai the Levite helped them. 16And the children of the captivity did thus: and Esdras the priest, and heads of families according to their house were separated, and all by their names, for they returned in the first day of the tenth month to search out the matter. 17And they made an end with all the men who had taken strange wives by the first day of the first month.”
-Ezra 10

In Nehemiah we find a witness to a similar circumstance where we see Judah repent from its idolatry and fornication and segregate itself from all aliens. Clearly these Judahites understood the importance of racial separation according to the law.

“1Now on the twenty-fourth day of this month the children of Israel assembled with fasting, and in sackcloths, and with ashes on their head. 2And the children of Israel separated themselves from every stranger, and stood and confessed their sins, and the iniquities of their fathers. 3And they stood in their place, and read in the book of the law of the Lord their god: and they confessed their sins to the Lord, and worshipped the Lord their God.”
-Nehemiah 9

These passages stand as an example for us as to how one must go about repenting of mixed unions and offspring. We see in chapter 10 of Nehemiah that those of Judah who did not transgress in this way admonished the rest to be separate from the Canaanites. So Christians must do today, excommunicating those who would try to corrupt the body of Christ.

“28And the rest of the people, the priests, the Levites, the porters, the singers, the Nathinim, and every one who drew off from the nations of the land to the law of God, their wives, their sons, their daughters, every one who had knowledge and understanding, 29were urgent with their brethren, and bound them under a curse, and entered into a curse, and into an oath, to walk in the law of God, which was given by the hand of Moses, the servant of God; to keep and to do all the commandments of the Lord, and his judgments, and his ordinances; 30and that we will not, they said, give our daughters to the people of the land, nor will we take their daughters to our sons.”
-Nehemiah 10

It was doubtless difficult for the men of Judah to put away their mongrel wives and offspring as seen in these passages but one must understand the importance of Adamic posterity. Christ said at Luke 14.26 that we must put God before our own kin. Surely if we put bastard offspring before the commandments of God we cannot be his disciples.

Many teachers in the mainstream churches realize to some extent that God commanded racial separation for the children of Israel, however most such teachers believe this is no longer commanded. They claim that since the “Gentiles” are under the New Covenant that the commandments to be separate can no longer apply. This is absolutely false, for we “Gentiles” under the New Covenant are none other than the dispersed Israelites scattered abroad and we are surely still expected to keep God’s commandments.

‘The New Covenant with Israel’

‘The Dispersions of Israel: a Company of Nations’

Throughout the New Testament the nations recieve instruction to abstain from fornication. Most are aware that this refers to sexual immorality in general but few accept that fornication means the same thing in the New Testament as in the Old Testament. This of course is foolishness.

The group of words used in the New Testament translated as “fornication”, “fornicate” and “fornicator” are the very same words used in the Old Testament to refer to the acts of miscegenation and idolatry.

Porneia, Strong’s G4202:
From porneuo; harlotry (including adultery and incest); figuratively, idolatry — fornication.”

“1) illicit sexual intercourse
1a) adultery, fornication, homosexuality, lesbianism, intercourse with animals etc. 
1b) sexual intercourse with close relatives; Lev. 18
1c) sexual intercourse with a divorced man or woman; Mk. 10:11,12 2) metaph. the worship of idols 
2a) of the defilement of idolatry, as incurred by eating the sacrifices offered to idols”

Porneuo, Strong’s G4203:
“commit fornication.
From porne; to act the harlot, i.e. (literally) indulge unlawful lust (of either sex), or (figuratively) practise idolatry — commit (fornication).”

“1) to prostitute one’s body to the lust of another
2) to give one’s self to unlawful sexual intercourse 
2a) to commit fornication 
3) metaph. to be given to idolatry, to worship idols 
3a) to permit one’s self to be drawn away by another into idolatry”

Porne, Strong’s G4204:
“prostitute, harlot
Feminine of pornos; a strumpet; figuratively, an idolater — harlot, whore.”

“1) a woman who sells her body for sexual uses
1a) a prostitute, a harlot, one who yields herself to defilement for the sake of gain 
1b) any woman indulging in unlawful sexual intercourse, whether for gain or for lust 
2) metaph. an idolatress 
2a) of “Babylon” i.e. Rome, the chief seat of idolatry”

Pornos, Strong’s G4205:
“fornicator, whoremonger.
From pernemi (to sell; akin to the base of piprasko); a (male) prostitute (as venal), i.e. (by analogy) a debauchee (libertine) — fornicator, whoremonger.”

“1) a man who prostitutes his body to another’s lust for hire
2) a male prostitute 
3) a man who indulges in unlawful sexual intercourse, a fornicator”

Adultery, harlotry and miscegenation are all inextricably linked in Scripture. It is also evident in Scripture that miscegenation is forbidden and thus fits the definitions of illicit or unlawful.

Some Christians will undoubtedly claim that the imperative to not miscegenate is a relic of the law given at Sinai. While Christians are no longer bound to the rituals of the law we are bound to the moral commandments and it cannot be said that Israel’s duty to abstain from miscegenation was in any way a ritualistic ordinance. In fact we find long before Sinai that miscegenation is an act of fornication as we shall see very clearly later on.


As we have already seen, miscegenation is a breach of the commandment “thou shalt not commit adultery”. Furthermore, it was established at the Council of Jerusalem that we are to abstain from fornication. The decree to the nations at the Council of Jerusalem was concerning the relationship of the nations to the law. If the definition of fornication had been changed this would’ve been the perfect opportunity to say so, but the Apostles did not. Rather it was simply stated that we must abstain from fornication.

“23 And they wrote letters by them after this manner; The apostles and elders and brethren send greeting unto the brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia.

24 Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no such commandment:

25 It seemed good unto us, being assembled with one accord, to send chosen men unto you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul,

26 Men that have hazarded their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.

27 We have sent therefore Judas and Silas, who shall also tell you the same things by mouth.

28 For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things;

29 That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.”
-Acts 15

There are several witnesses in the New Testament which clearly refute the notion that the Scriptural definition of fornication was changed at the establishment of the New Covenant. Here St. Paul writes to the Dorian Greeks of Corinth. These Corinthians were descendants of the ancient dispersion of Israel among the Greeks.


Here St. Paul refers to Numbers 25 where God destroyed a portion of Israel for fornicating with with the Moabites as did some of the Israelites among the forebears of both St. Paul and the Corinthians.

“1 Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea;

2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea;

3 And did all eat the same spiritual meat;

4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.

5 But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness.

6 Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted.

7 Neither be ye idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play.

8 Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and fell in one day three and twenty thousand.”
-Corinthians 10

Clearly St. Paul is instructing his readers to abstain from the sin committed by their ancient Israelite forebears which was miscegenation. The one who led Israel to fornication with Moab was Balaam and for this he is condemned throughout Scripture.

In the epistle of St. Jude “the error of Balaam” is mentioned in relation to the sin of the fallen Angels bound in “chains of darkness” who mongrelized creation.

‘The Origins of the Non-Adamic Races’


The error of Balaam is also mentioned alongside the sin of Sodom and Gomorrha in “going after strange flesh”. Some claim this verse refers to homophilia, but this interpretation is the opposite of the meaning of the Greek text which uses sarkos (Strong’s G4561 meaning “flesh”) heteras (G2087 meaning “different”, “altered” or “strange”). Heteras is an antonym of homou (G3674) which gives us the prefix homo.

“5 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.

6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains of darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

8 Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.

9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.

10 But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.

11 Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.

12 These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;

13 Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.”
-Jude 1

Later in his epistle Jude quotes Enoch concerning the judgement of these idolaters, fornicators and mongrels. In all the extant Enoch literature we find the consistent theme of mongrelization as as a grevious sin and the mongrels as worthy of destruction.

“9 And to Gabriel said the Lord: ‘Proceed against the bastards and the reprobates, and against the children of fornication: and destroy [the children of fornication and] the children of the Watchers from amongst men [and cause them to go forth]: send them one against the other that they may destroy each other in battle: for length of days shall they not have.”
-Enoch 10

St. Jude’s words remind us also of the words of St. Peter in chapter 2 of his second epistle. Here we again see the condemnation of the forces and acts of miscegenation in the Old Testament and fittingly these sins are associated with those who would seek to deceive and undermine Christendom.

“1 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.

2 And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.

3 And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.

4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;

5 And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;

6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;

7 And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:

8 (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;)

9 The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished:

10 But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities.

11 Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring not railing accusation against them before the Lord.

12 But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption;

13 And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you;

14 Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:

15 Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness;

16 But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man’s voice forbad the madness of the prophet.

17 These are wells without water, clouds that are carried with a tempest; to whom the mist of darkness is reserved for ever.”
-2 Peter 2

So we see from the epistles of St. Jude and St. Peter the condemnation of miscegenation as an act of fornication and the reminder that the results of that sin plague us to this day. They remain among us as blemishes, spots in our feasts of charity (recall the definition of mamzer), snares, stumbling-blocks, nails in our heels, and darts in our eyes as prophecied (Joshua 23.13).

St. Peter also mentions Noah’s preservation from the flood when God destroyed the Adamites and their bastard offspring from the land. Noah was chosen to preserve the Adamic race because he was “perfect in his race” (Genesis 6.9, genea, Strong’s G1074 meaning “race, stock, family” [Liddell and Scott s.v.] or “men of the same stock, a family” [Thayer s.v.]).

The error of Balaam is mentioned yet again in Revelation chapter 2 where we again see Israel mingling with Moab defined as an act of fornication.

“12 And to the angel of the church in Pergamos write; These things saith he which hath the sharp sword with two edges;

13 I know thy works, and where thou dwellest, even where Satan’s seat is: and thou holdest fast my name, and hast not denied my faith, even in those days wherein Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth.

14 But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication.

15 So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes, which thing I hate.

16 Repent; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth.”
-Revelation 2

In his epistle to the Hebrews St. Paul describes Esau as a fornicator and profane person. As we have seen earlier in this presentation Esau was indeed a fornicator. His act of fornication was miscegenation and he is never recorded as having had extramarital or incestuous sexual relations. Rather as we saw earlier in this article his marriages themselves were condemned because his wives were taken of the mongrel Canaanites.

“14 Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:

15 Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled;

16 Lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.”
-Hebrews 12

In John chapter 8 Jesus is adressing his Judaean detractors. As history and Scripture attest these Judaeans were descended from bastardized seed of Abraham through the fornication of Esau and Judah.

‘The Satanic Origins of the Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews’ https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-satanic-origins-of-the-edomite-jews/

These Judaeans tried to justify themselves by stating their descent from Abraham and denying being born of fornication. Christ affirms that they are indeed spurious where in verses 42-44 he calls them sons of the devil.

“37 I know that ye are Abraham’s seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you.

38 I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.

39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.

41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.

42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.

43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.

44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”
-John 8

These Judaean’s denial of their bastardized heritage in verse 41 is a reference to Malachi 2 where we find that Judah has married the daughter of a strange God. This of course refers to the mingling of the sons of Judah with the daughters of Canaan who indeed descended in part from the devil’s brood. Thus Jesus rightly tells them they do the deeds of their father the devil. One may descend paternally from the patriarchs but if one is born of miscegenation they are cut off and belong to the devil.

“10Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why then doth every one of us despise his brother, violating the covenant of our fathers?

11Juda hath transgressed, and abomination hath been committed in Israel, and in Jerusalem: for Juda hath profaned the holiness of the Lord, which he loved, and hath married the daughter of a strange god.

12The Lord will cut off the man that hath done this, both the master, and the scholar, out of the tabernacles of Jacob, and him that offereth an offering to the Lord of hosts.”
-Malachi 2

Some will point to the law of the proselyte in the Old Testament as evidence that the Israelite ethno-religion was racially compromising, however Scripture disproves this. Under the Old Covenant only non-Israelites of Adamic stock were permitted to live among Israel and were expected to keep the laws given to Israel. Racial aliens are specifically excluded.

“43And the Lord said to Moses and Aaron, This is the law of the passover: no stranger [allogenes, G241 meaning literally “of another race” i.e. a non-Adamite] shall eat of it. 44And every slave or servant bought with money—him thou shalt circumcise, and then shall he eat of it. 45A sojourner or hireling shall not eat of it. 46In one house shall it be eaten, and ye shall not carry of the flesh out from the house; and a bone of it ye shall not break. 47All the congregation of the children of Israel shall keep it. 48And if any proselyte shall come to you to keep the passover to the Lord, thou shalt circumcise every male of him, and then shall he approach to sacrifice it, and he shall be even as the original inhabitant of the land; no uncircumcised person shall eat of it. 49There shall be one law to the native, and to the proselyte coming among you.”
-Exodus 12

We also find other Scriptures which remind us of the proselyte’s obligation to the law (Leviticus 24.22, Numbers 9.14, 15.15-16). These ordinances set the precedent for later Christian assemblies. The Israelite nations with whom the New Covenant was made co-existed with the remnants of the various Adamic nations who had preceded them into Europe, the Mediterranean Basin and Asia Minor. Under this provision of the law these other Adamites dwell among us as Christians, circumcised in their hearts, keeping the statutes of Israel and sharing in the passover.

‘The Tree of Life: Redemption of the Adamic Race’

In attempting to defend miscegenation many have claimed that certain women who married Israelites were of alien racial stock. Of course even if they were not in error in claiming these women were racial aliens, such alleged exceptions could never negate the rules laid out in Scripture which condemn miscegenation. Here I will not discuss these errors at any great length as better scholars have already undertaken that work.




It is often claimed that Moses’ Cushite wife (Numbers 12.1) was a negress like certain modern inhabitants of Ethiopia, but this assumption does not stand up to scrutiny. Moses’ Cushite wife must have been from one of the Cushite settlements on the Arabian shores of the Red Sea since Moses had sojourned in Midian (Exodus 2.15) and after crossing the Red Sea the Israelites went immediately into the wilderness of Shur (Exodus 15.22) making it unlikely that Moses met his Cushite wife in Africa. It is far more probable that this woman hailed from the Cushitic Havilah (Genesis 10.7) located somewhere in the Arabian Peninsula near the Eastern borders of Egypt (Genesis 25.18, 1 Samuel 15.7).

‘The Noahite Nations: the Hamites’

It can be demonstrated that the Ethiopians of the Horn of Africa were originally a goodly Adamic race and not the mongrelized Caucasoid-Congoid hybrids who dwell there today. Classical accounts of ancient Ethiopia clearly differentiate the true Cushites from the Negroe tribes of the region. The former are described as animalistic and uncivilized in contrast to the highly literate and culturally advanced Ethiopians described elsewhere.

Other accounts make mention of Leucaethiopians (White Ethiopians) inhabiting North Africa alongside their Hamitic Berber and Libyan-Egyptian cousins. The Cushites also played important roles in classical myths and produced figures such as Memnon and Andromeda. The truth of these records is borne out by genetic and anthropological evidence which clearly shows the mixed Congoid-Caucasoid origins of today’s Ethiopian population.

‘Concerning the Ancient Aethiops’

Some claim that Ruth was a Moabitess by race as she is called a Moabitess in the book of Ruth, however it can be established that she was an Israelite by race and only a Moabitess by geography. Such applications of Canaanite patronyms to Israelites as demonyms are elsewhere found in our Old Testament at 2 Samuel 23.24-39. There we see Israelite warriors are named as Beerothite, Pirathonite, Shaalbonite, Ammonite and Hittite etc. according to their habitation and not their race.

It is certain that in the time of Ruth Moab belonged to the Israelites as Scripture clearly informs us (Numbers 21.25-29, Deuteronomy 3.12-16, Judges 11.12-26, Zephaniah 2.9, Isaiah 25.10). Only a small portion of the territory of Moab was retained by the Moabites South of the river Arnon, bordered by the land given to the tribe of Reuben in the North, and by Edom in the South.

In Deuteronomy 23.3 we are told that a Moabite is excluded from the congregation of Israel even to the tenth generation. Ruth’s descendant David only a few generations later was certainly a part of the congregation (Psalm 40.9) and was a man treasured by God. Certainly his ancestor Ruth could not have been a Moabite and to claim otherwise is an insult to God and his law.

It is further proven that Ruth was an Israelite in Ruth 4 where we find she is redeemed by Boaz, an Israelite. Another Israelite man was first in line to redeem her (thus even closer kin) yet could not due to his personal circumstances. According to the law the role of a redeemer could only be fulfilled by a kinsmen (Deuteronomy 25.5-10) and so her redeemer had to have been kindred. Obviously her kindred were Israelites.

Some point to Ruth 1.16 where Ruth’s words are commonly translated “your people shall be my people and your God shall be my God”. First we ought to consider the fact that many of the Israelites had adopted paganism and syncretism and that Ruth, even as an Israelite, may well have been pagan. Even so, this passage merits further consideration.

The words “shall be” are not to be found in the Greek, Hebrew or Latin text but are merely inserted by later translators acting upon their errant interpretations. Better translations are provided by the Wycliffe Bible and Young’s Literal translation which read “thi puple is my puple, and thi God is my God” and “thy people is my people, and thy God my God.”.

Some claim that Rahab was a Canaanite but there is no Scripture whatsoever to support this. It is simply errantly assumed that she was a Canaanite because she inhabited a city of Canaan, yet so did many Hebrews such as Abraham himself as well as the Adamic Philistines and so we cannot simply assume that any inhabitant of Canaan was a racial Canaanite. Such an assumption is certainly errant, especially when it implies illicit ancestry in the genealogy of our Lord Jesus Christ.

It is amply clear throughout the law, the prophets, and the writings of the apostles that the definition of fornication includes miscegenation and remains the same as when God established it. It refers to sexual deviancy in all its forms, and that clearly still includes miscegenation. To deny this is to deny much of the essential fabric of Scripture. This is an expansive topic which ties in to every facet of Scripture in some way, but I hope that here I have made a compelling case for the importance of racial separatism for the children of God.

“1Hear these things, ye priests; and attend, O house of Israel; and hearken, O house of the king; for the controversy is with you, because ye have been a snare in Scopia, and as a net spread on Itabyrium,
2which they that hunt the prey have fixed: but I will correct you.
3I know Ephraim, and Israel is not far from me: for now Ephraim has gone grievously a-whoring, Israel is defiled.
4They have not framed their counsels to return to their God, for the spirit of fornication is in them, and they have not known the Lord.
5And the pride of Israel shall be brought low before his face; and Israel and Ephraim shall fall in their iniquities; and Judas also shall fall with them.
6They shall go with sheep and calves diligently to seek the Lord; but they shall not find him, for he has withdrawn himself from them.
7For they have forsaken the Lord; for strange children have been born to them: now shall the cankerworm devour them and their heritages.”
-Hosea 5

“12The heaven is amazed at this, and is very exceedingly horror-struck, saith the Lord. 13For my people has committed two faults, and evil ones: they have forsaken me, the fountain of water of life, and hewn out for themselves broken cisterns, which will not be able to hold water.”
-Jeremiah 2

“15Drink waters out of thine own vessels, and out of thine own springing wells 16Let not waters out of thy fountain be spilt by thee, but let thy waters go into thy streets. 17Let them be only thine own, and let no stranger partake with thee. 18Let thy fountain of water be truly thine own; and rejoice with the wife of thy youth. 19Let thy loving hart and thy graceful colt company with thee, and let her be considered thine own, and be with thee at all times; for ravished with her love thou shalt be greatly increased. 20Be not intimate with a foreign woman, neither fold thyself in the arms of a woman not thine own.”
-Proverbs 5

“1Better it is to have no children, and to have virtue: for the memorial thereof is immortal: because it is known with God, and with men.
2When it is present, men take example at it; and when it is gone, they desire it: it weareth a crown, and triumpheth for ever, having gotten the victory, striving for undefiled rewards.
3But the multiplying brood of the ungodly shall not thrive, nor take deep rooting from bastard slips, nor lay any fast foundation.
4For though they flourish in branches for a time; yet standing not last, they shall be shaken with the wind, and through the force of winds they shall be rooted out.
5The imperfect branches shall be broken off, their fruit unprofitable, not ripe to eat, yea, meet for nothing.
6For children begotten of unlawful beds are witnesses of wickedness against their parents in their trial.’
-Wisdom of Solomon 4


The Dispersions of Israel: a Company of Nations

‘The Good Shepherd’
-Frederick James Shields

It is commonly perceived by most Christians today that the Jews of recent historical memory are the legitimate offspring of Judah, and that these Jews are the only remnant of racial Israelites left in the world. This brood of degenerate anti-Christs certainly does not behave as one would expect of God’s people and so perhaps we ought to ask ourselves; would God elect a race of usurers, pornography producers, human traffickers, blasphemers, blood drinkers, thieves, and ritual murderers?



Most certainly not. The Jews of today are neither Judahites nor Israelites but are a racial conglomeration of Kenites, Canaanites and Edomites. They are primarily descended from the Edomites who were conquered converted and integrated into Judaea in 125 BC by John Hyrcanus.

‘The Satanic Origins of the Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews’ https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-satanic-origins-of-the-edomite-jews/

Regardless of these facts, even if they were the House of Judah as they falsely claim, it would not make them the heirs of the Israelite legacy as they would have us believe. The overwhelming majority of the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob-Israel vanished from the Near East 1,600-700 years before the birth of Jesus Christ to fulfill the promise to Jacob-Israel that his “seed” would “become many nations” and “a company of nations”. Not one nation in Canaan.

The greater portion of Israel never had any part in the tribe of Judah, the Kingdom of Judah or the province of Judaea, and none of them were ever called Jews. Christians however fulfill all promise and prophecy concerning Israel to date.

Christ said plainly in Matthew 15.24 that He came only unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. This refers to both spiritually lost Judaean Israelites and the Israelites dispersed among the nations. The latter are the same “sheep of another fold” as mentioned in John 10.16.

Opening his epistle St. James greets all twelve tribes of Israel “which are scattered abroad”. Not just the three tribes present among the Judaeans (Judah, Benjamin and Levi).

“1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.”
-James 1

Here St. Peter addresses his epistle to “those who are elect exiles of the dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia”. St. Peter of course refers to the dispersed Israelites scattered about Asia Minor known to history as Celts, Romans, Greeks and Scythians.

“1 Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, To those who are elect exiles of the dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, 2 who have been chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through the sanctifying work of the Spirit, to be obedient to Jesus Christ and sprinkled with his blood: Grace and peace be yours in abundance.”
-1 Peter 1

When St. Paul stood before the Edomite Herod Agrippa he gave account of his conversion to Christianity and the mission laid before him by God to minister to all twelve tribes of Israel. Note that here we see clearly that the twelve tribes are distinct from the Judaeans and that the Judaeans are in fact in opposition to the interests of the twelve tribes.

“4 My manner of life from my youth, which was at the first among mine own nation at Jerusalem, know all the Judeans;
5 Which knew me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straitest sect of our religion I lived a Pharisee.
6 And now I stand and am judged for the hope of the promise made of God, unto our fathers:
7 Unto which promise our twelve tribes, instantly serving God day and night, hope to come. For which hope’s sake, king Agrippa, I am accused of the Judeans.”
-Acts 26

In the space of 1,000 years every White nation of Europe embraced the prophecied Christ and came to be called by his name. There is only one Abrahamic faith and only one annointed race and they are Christianity and the Christian peoples of Europe and the European diaspora.

‘The New Covenant with Israel’

The real Israelites have been dispersed to the North and the West, Iberia, Anatolia, Persia, Russia and Greece.

Speaking of the restoration of Israel, Isaiah writes in chapter 49 that “Behold, these shall come from far: and these from the north and the west, and others from the land of the Persians” (vs. 12). In chapter 66 Isaiah writes of a ministry of Israelites to the nations saying “I will send forth them that have escaped of them to the nations, to Tarshiysh [Strong’s H8659], and Puwl [H6322], and Luwd [H3865]”. Next The LXX has Mosoch (the Greek transliteration of Meshek, H4902) where the Masoretic Text reads “that draw the bow” (mashak, H4900).

Isaiah 66.19 continues: “to Tuwbal [H8422], and to Yavan [H3120], and to the isles afar off”. Puwl was a king of Assyria (Strong’s and Gesenius’ s.v.) and Tarshiysh is named for a son of Javan. His territory corresponds to ancient Tartessus in Iberia while his father gave his name to Ionia on the Eastern Aegean coast. Luwd was a son of Shem who left his name to the lands of Lydia and Luwia in Anatolia. The original habitations of Japheth’s sons Meshek and Tuwbal can be identified with the regions of Moscow and Tobolsk in Russia.

‘The Noahite Nations: the Japhethites’

‘The Noahite Nations: the Shemites’

In Jeremiah chapter 3 Got tells the prophet “Go and read these words toward the north, and thou shalt say, Return to me, O house of Israel” (vs. 12). In that same chapter the prophet speaks of dispersed Israel and Judah saying “they shall come, together, from the land of the north” (vs. 18). In Jeremiah 23 we read “behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when they shall no more say, The Lord lives, who brought up the house of Israel out of the land of Egypt; but The Lord lives, who has gathered the whole seed of Israel from the north land” (vss. 7-8). Later in chapter 31 Jeremiah says “I will bring them from the north country” (vs. 8). Opening his first epistle St. Peter addresses “those who are elect exiles of the Dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia” (vs. 1), all districts within Anatolia inhabited by Greeks, Romans and Gauls.

It can be demonstrated clearly through a thorough examination of Scripture and ancient history that the children of Israel were dispersed in a series of migrations from the time of the Exodus until the Assyrian captivity. These Israelites were dispersed to all of the territories mentioned in Isaiah 49.12, 66.19, Jeremiah 3.18, 23.7-8, 31.8 and 1 Peter 1.1. There they were variously known by the names of Scythians, Cimmerians, Phoenicians, Carthaginians, Dardaans, Trojans, Danaans, Dorians and their various more particular tribal divisions.







The Israelites are comprised of mighty nations, having command of the waters, coasts and vast lands and possessing the gates of their enemies.

In Genesis 22 God promises Abraham “thy seed shall inherit the cities of their enemies” (vs. 17) and later on in chapter 24 Rebekah’s family blesses her saying “let thy seed possess the cities of their enemies.” (vs. 60). In Genesis 49 Jacob blesses Judah saying “thy hands shall be on the back of thine enemies” (vs. 8). He also blessed Joseph saying “God helped thee, and he blessed thee with the blessing of heaven from above, and the blessing of the earth possessing all things” (vs. 25).

In Numbers 24 Balaam prophecies of Jacob-Israel saying “He shall pour the water out of his buckets, and his seed shall be in many waters, and his king shall be higher than Agag, and his kingdom shall be exalted.” (vs. 7) In Deuteronomy 33 Moses blesses Joseph saying “Of the blessing of the Lord be his land, of the fruits of heaven, and of the dew, and of the deep that lieth beneath.” (vs. 13). He also blesses Zebulon “Who shall suck as milk the abundance of the sea, and the hidden treasures of the sands.” (vs 19) Psalm 89 speaks of blessings upon King David writing that “I will set his hand also in the sea, and his right hand in the rivers.” (vs. 25)

Only one race has maintained consistent command of the seas and it can only be European colonial and naval forces who have fulfilled these prophecies of power and ambition. Europeans have laid claim to soil in virtually every nation on earth and taken command of virtually every major port and naval route. From the maritime golden age of Phoenicia to the Vikings to the Spanish and British empires, the White race has maintained mastery of the seas throughout the ages.

The true Israelites are a company or commonwealth of nations.

In Genesis 35 God appears to Jacob, blesses him and says “I am thy God; increase and multiply; for nations and gatherings [H6951, G4864] of nations shall be of thee, and kings shall come out of thy loins.” (vs. 11) The word qahal (H6951) properly means “assembly, company, congregation, multitude” (Strong’s s.v.), “Especially the the congregation of the people of Israel” (Gesenius’ s.v.).

Synagoge (G4864) properly means “an assemblage of persons; specially, a Jewish [sic Judaean] “synagogue”” (Strong’s s.v.), “an assembly, congregation” (Dodson s.v.) or “a bringing together, uniting” (Liddell-Scott-Jones s.v.). The company of nations prophecied to come from the fathers must therefore be an organized society of nations united and assembled together as a unified cohesive entity.

This is affirmed in Ephesians 2 where Paul tells the Greeks of Ephesus “at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth [G4174] of Israel” (vs. 12). Politeia (G4174) means “citizenship”, “community” (Strong’s s.v.), “polity; citizen body” (Dodson s.v.) or “citizenship” (Liddell-Scott-Jones s.v.). Clearly Jacob’s company of nations constitutes an organized polity. European Christians have organized many such societies such as the Holy Roman Empire, the British Commonwealth and the United States of America to name a few, all of which are ultimately united as parts of Christendom. 

The Israelites are the custodians of God’s word.

In Psalm 147 in a Psalm of Haggai and Zacharias we read “He sends his word to Jacob, his ordinances and judgments to Israel. He has not done so to any other nation; and he has not shewn them his judgments.” (vss. 19-20) At Isaiah 59 the prophet speaks of the New Covenant saying “My Spirit which is upon thee, and the words which I have put in thy mouth, shall never fail from thy mouth, nor from the mouth of thy seed, for the Lord has spoken it, henceforth and for ever.” (vs. 21)

European Christians can certainly take credit for their stewardship of the Scriptures. Important Bible versions produced or preserved by the White race include the Greek Septuagint and New Testament, the Aramaic Peshitta and Diatessaron, the Latin Vetus Latina and Vulgate, the Gothic Wufila Bible, the Old English Hexateuch, the Middle English Wycliffe’s Bible, the German Luther Bible and the English King James Bible. No race has done more for the preservation and distribution of the Scriptures than Europeans.

True Israel would colonize and spread abroad.

During Jacob’s vision of the ladder to heaven in Genesis 28 God spoke to him saying “thy seed shall be as the sand of the earth; and it shall spread abroad to the sea, and the south, and the north, and to the east” (vs. 14) in Deuteronomy 33 Moses blesses Joseph saying “His beauty is as the firstling of his bull, his horns are the horns of a unicorn; with them he shall thrust the nations at once, even from the end of the earth: these are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and these are the thousands of Manasse.” (vs. 17)

In Isaiah chapter 26 the prophet praises the Lord saying “thou hast increased the nation: thou art glorified: thou hadst removed it far unto all the ends of the earth.” (vs. 15) In the next chapter Isaiah speaks of the deliverance of Israel where he writes “they that are coming are the children of Jacob. Israel shall bud and blossom, and the world shall be filled with his fruit.” (vs. 6)

At chapter 54 the prophet describes the future blessing of Israel saying “Enlarge the place of thy tent, and of thy curtains: fix the pins, spare not, lengthen thy cords, and strengthen thy pins; spread forth thy tent yet to the right and the left: for thy seed shall inherit the nations, and thou shalt make the desolate cities to be inhabited.” (vss. 2-3) Speaking of the restoration of Israel in Zechariah 10 the prophet says “I will sow them among the people; and they that are afar off shall remember me: they shall nourish their children, and they shall return.” (vs. 9)

Quite clearly these passages describe and foretell the colonial expansions of Israel who was destined to spread abroad, thrust the nations from the ends of the earth, inherit the nations and inhabit the desolate places. This of course has found fulfillment in the European Christian race and its many colonial endeavours, both ancient and modern.

“22 And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.
23 But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.
24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
-Matthew 15

“27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:

28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.

29 My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my hand.”
-John 10

“8Behold, I bring them from the north, and will gather them from the end of the earth to the feast of the passover: and the people shall beget a great multitude, and they shall return hither.

9They went forth with weeping, and I will bring them back with consolation, causing them to lodge by the channels of waters in a straight way, and they shall not err in it: for I am become a father to Israel, and Ephraim is my first-born.

10Hear the words of the Lord, ye nations, and proclaim them to the islands afar off; say, He that scattered Israel will also gather him, and keep him as one that feeds his flock.”
-Jeremiah 31

“1Hearken to me, ye islands; and attend, ye nations; after a long time it shall come to pass, saith the Lord: from my mother’s womb he has called my name:

2and he has made my mouth as a sharp sword, and he has hid me under the shadow of his hand; he has made me as a choice shaft, and he has hid me in his quiver;

3and said to me, Thou art my servant, O Israel, and in thee I will be glorified.

4Then I said, I have laboured in vain, I have given my strength for vanity and for nothing: therefore is my judgment with the Lord, and my labour before my God.

5And now, thus saith the Lord that formed me from the womb to be his own servant, to gather Jacob to him and Israel. I shall be gathered and glorified before the Lord, and my God shall be my strength.

6And he said to me, It is a great thing for thee to be called my servant, to establish the tribes of Jacob, and to recover the dispersion of Israel: behold, I have given thee for the covenant of a race, for a light of the nations, that thou shouldest be for salvation to the end of the earth.

7Thus saith the Lord that delivered thee, the God of Israel, Sanctify him that despises his life, him that is abhorred by the nations that are the servants of princes: kings shall behold him, and princes shall arise, and shall worship him, for the Lord’s sake: for the Holy One of Israel is faithful, and I have chosen thee.

8Thus saith the Lord, In an acceptable time have I heard thee, and in a day of salvation have I succored thee: and I have formed thee, and given thee for a covenant of the nations, to establish the earth, and to cause to inherit the desert heritages:

9saying to them that are in bonds, Go forth; and bidding them that are in darkness shew themselves. They shall be fed in all the ways, and in all the paths shall be their pasture.

10They shall not hunger, neither shall they thirst; neither shall the heat nor the sun smite them; but he that has mercy on them shall comfort them, and by fountains of waters shall he lead them.

11And I will make every mountain a way, and every path a pasture to them.

12Behold, these shall come from far: and these from the North and the West, and others from the land of the Persians.

13Rejoice, ye heavens; and let the earth be glad: let the mountains break forth with joy; for the Lord has had mercy on his people, and has comforted the lowly ones of his people.”
-Isaiah 49

“8 For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:
9 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.
10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people.”
-Hebrews 8

“35Thus saith the Lord, who gives the sun for a light by day, the moon and the stars for a light by night, and makes a roaring in the sea, so that the waves thereof roar; the Lord Almighty is his name:
36if these ordinances cease from before me, saith the Lord, then shall the race (genos, Strong’s G1085) of Israel cease to be a nation before me forever.
37Though the sky should be raised to a greater height, saith the Lord, and though the ground of the earth should be sunk lower beneath, yet I will not cast off the race of Israel, saith the Lord, for all that they have done.”
-Jeremiah 31

“9 But ye are a chosen race [genos, Strong’s G1085], a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light.”
-1 Peter 2

Sumer: the Civilization of Babel

Statue, Ebih II, Ur.

Biblical scholars have long generally agreed that the Shinar or Senaar of Genesis 11 where the Noahites all gathered after the flood is the Sumer of ancient Mesopotamia.

This is supported by the similarity in the two Semitic names (Sumer is an Akkadian word), the matching geographical descriptions and the association with Babel, Akkad and Uruk.

In Genesis 10.10 the empire of Nimrod is described as encompassing Babel, Akkad and Uruk in the land of Shinar. This seems to describe the first Sumerian Empire which came to rule over Mesopotamia, the Levant and Anatolia.

In Genesis 11 the Noahites all gathered in Sumer/Shinar and there they shared in the same speech and custom:

“1And all the earth was one lip, and there was one language to all. 2And it came to pass as they moved from the east, they found a plain in the land of Senaar, and they dwelt there.”
-Genesis 11

Sumerian votive statue, Eshnunna.

The Sumerian language is known today as a linguistic isolate, but was once thought to be the origin of the Indo-European languages. A comparison between Sumerian and Indo-European was made by Charles Autran already in 1925, finding many similar roots and even suffixes, like -ta for the origin (Sanskrit -tas), -bi for the instrumental (Sanskrit -bhis).

Gordon Whittaker, since 1998, has identified so-called Euphratic, a substratum or superstratum in Sumerian, with an Indo-European language. Particularly interesting is his analysis of the phonetic values, without meaning in Sumerian, of pictographic symbols, which in some cases can suggest an IE connection.

The symbol for a fish is read peš, which recalls PIE *pisk/peisk- ‘fish’, perhaps from the Indo-European root pi- ‘to drink’ and the frequentative suffix -sk-. The symbol of a bird is read hu, and can be compared with PIE *hwi/hwai- ‘bird’ (notably Armenian hav meaning ‘chicken’).

The logogram for ‘dog’, with an animal head, is read lik, and recalls PIE *wlkwa- ‘wolf’, especially Greek lykos. The logogram for ‘fox’, with the symbol of a fox’s head with large ears, is read lib/lub, comparable to the PIE *wlpe- ‘fox’ (Latin vulpes, Greek alopex), which is apparently an offshoot or variant of the previous one (with kw > p).

The phonetic values for ‘prince’ are nar/nara, as in the Sanskrit term for ‘man, hero’ (ner/nir). In a publication of 2012, Whittaker has suggested laws of phonetic change from Euphratic to Sumerian, which is a necessary aspect in a scientific demonstration of the existence of this Indo-European language.

In support he cites other examples of phonetic values, like sah/suh for the sign ‘thread+thread’, recalling Sanskrit sū-tra-‘thread’, from the root s(y)ū- ‘to sew’, corresponding to Latin su-ere. Also of note is semed for the sign ‘one’, comparable to the PIE root *sam-, found e.g. in English same and Latin semel ‘once’.

Also Aleksi Sahala, Assyriologist of the University of Helsinki, has between 2009 and 2013 proposed 30 Sumerian words with a possible common etymology with Indo-European.

In 1927, the British explorer and scholar of Sanskrit, Laurence Waddell published a book with the title Aryan Origin of the Alphabet and Sumer-Aryan Dictionary.

Sumerian civilization was generally bilingual with the general populace being fluent in both Sumerian and Akkadian, the earliest attested Semitic language. Of course both languages used the same Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform.

Sumerian cuneiform account, Shuruppak.

Linguists regard the relationship between Sumerian and Akkadian as a “sprachbund”; a group of languages with profound influence on one another from lexical borrowing on a large scale, to syntactic, morphological, and phonological convergence.

The Sumerian language is somewhat of a mystery to scholars. It is an isolate with no clear ancestors or descendants, but also with clear relationships with both Afro-Asiatic and Indo-European languages and potentially with other contemporary linguistic isolates such as Elamite.

Thus I would identify Sumerian or its parent language as the the united tongue of the Noahites described in Genesis 11.1. This explains why it is a distinct isolate with such diverse affinities with many far-flung languages such as Uralic, Kartvellian, Basque, Sanskrit and Armenian as well as contemporary Akkadian.

In Shinar/Sumer the Noahites built ziggurats reaching to the sky. Ziggurats had spiritual significance to the ancient Mesopotamians who would erect altars at their peaks where they were closest to the heavens.

“3And a man said to his neighbour, Come, let us make bricks and bake them with fire. And the brick was to them for stone, and their mortar was bitumen. 4And they said, Come, let us build to ourselves a city and tower, whose top shall be to heaven, and let us make to ourselves a name, before we are scattered abroad upon the face of all the earth.”
-Genesis 11

The Sumerians introduced urban civilization and expanded their territory across Mesopotamia as far as Iran and Anatolia. Mesopotamian culture has, from ancient Sumer down to Babylon, been a very morally and sexually permissive culture. Lewd behavior was the norm with people frequently and freely enganging in public sex acts and all manner of sexual perversion. The pagan cults of Mesopotamia were among the most profane in all history. Temple prostitution, ritual miscegenation and human sacrifice were well known to the pagans of ancient Mesopotamia.


Ancient Sumer had degenerated into an immoral society in a short time quickly becoming an imperialistic, decadent, materialistic, perverse and idolatrous society. They reached towards the heavens and God above saw their pridefulness and sinfulness:

“5And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the sons of men built. 6And the Lord said, Behold, there is one people, and one lip of all, and they have begun to do this, and now nothing shall fail from them of all that they may have undertaken to do. 7Come, and having gone down let us there confound their tongue, that they may not understand each the voice of his neighbour. 8And the Lord scattered them thence over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city and the tower. 9On this account its name was called Confusion, because there the Lord confounded the languages of all the earth, and thence the Lord scattered them upon the face of all the earth.”
-Genesis 11

Statue, Eannatum, Lagash.

Interestingly the narrative of Genesis 11 is comparable to parts of the Sumerian epic Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta. In this tale Enmerkar of Uruk is building a massive ziggurat in Eridu and demands a tribute of precious materials from Aratta for its construction. At one point he recites an incantation imploring the god Enki to restore (or in Kramer’s translation, to disrupt) the linguistic unity of the inhabited regions which are named as Shubur, Hamazi, Sumer, Uri-ki (Akkad), and the Martu land. While quite different from the Genesis 11 account, both accounts contain the association of the construction of a large ziggurat with divine powers disrupting linguistic unity.

From this time hence forth the Noahites began to disperse from Mesopotamia through the whole of the Fertile Crescent, the Mediterranean Basin, and other points in Eurasia and North Africa.

These nations include the ancient tribes of Europe such as Tartesians, Rhodians, Ionians, Thracians and Lydians and Etruscans as well as White tribes of the Near East like the Medes, Aramaeans, Persians and Pharaonic Egyptians among others.

These are the ancestors of all Caucasians alive today and the broadest possible group of recipients of any promise or blessing from God.

Sumerian votive statues, Eshnunna.

‘Adam: The Patriarch of One Race’ https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/adam-the-patriarch-of-one-race/

‘The Tree of Life: Redemption of the Adamic Race’

‘The Noahite Nations: the Japhethites’

‘The Noahite Nations: the Hamites’

‘The Noahite Nations: the Shemites’


The Satanic Origins of the Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews

‘Christ Brought before Caiaphas’, Salvin Hours.

The people who bear the name of Jews today are commonly regarded by a large swath of modern Christendom as the legitimate and whole chosen people of Scripture. This is of course utterly erroneous on several levels, and here we will expose the nature of these devilish falsehoods.

The greater portion of Israel never had any part in the tribe of Judah, the Kingdom of Judah or the province of Judaea, and none of them were ever called Jews. The vast majority of the children of Israel left Egypt and Western Asia between 3,600-2,700 years ago to fulfill the promise to Jacob-Israel that his “seed” would “become many nations” and “a company of nations”.

‘The Dispersions of Israel: a Company of Nations’






‘The New Covenant with Israel’

Nonetheless the prevailing narrative among most Christians today is that the Jews of today are the offspring of Judah, and that this supposed house of Judah is the only remnant of racial Israelites left in the world.

This of course puzzles many people, for these Jews have historically been enemies of Christianity and every bastion of Christian morality in the West. Could the elect people chosen by God truly be a race of usurers, pornography producers, human traffickers, blasphemers, blood drinkers, thieves, and ritual murderers?



A woodcut from the Nuremberg Chronicle depicting the ritual murder of St. Simon of Trent.

Most certainly not. The Jews of today are neither Judahites nor Israelites but are a racial conglomeration of Kenites, Canaanites and Edomites. They are primarily descended from the Edomites who were conquered converted and integrated into Judaea in 125 BC by John Hyrcanus.

This is attested to in Josephus’ Antiquities of the Judeans, (13.257-258, 13.395-397 et al.) and Strabo’s Geography (book 16). Here are a couple notable references:

“257Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of Idumea [formerly cities of Manasseh and Judah respectively], and subdued all the Idumeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would circumcise their genitals, and make use of the laws of the Judeans; 258and they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers, that they submitted to the use of circumcision, and of the rest of the Judean ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, that they were hereafter no other than Judeans.”
-Josephus, Antiquities of the Judeans, 13.257-258

“34 As for Judaea, its western extremities towards Casius are occupied by the Idumaeans and by the lake. The Idumaeans are Nabataeans, but owing to a sedition they were banished from there, joined the Judaeans, and shared in the same customs with them.”
-Strabo, Geography, 16.2.34

‘Massacre of the Innocents’
-Matteo di Giovanni.

The murderous King Herod and the entire Herodian dynasty were Edomites by race (Antiquities 14.8-9, 403). These Edomites had risen to the peaks of power in Judaea through murder of the Hasmonean dynasty and by bribing Mark Antony.

These Edomites were ancestral foes of Israel who had mingled with the cursed Canaanites who in turn had mingled with the Kenites (the offspring of Cain and the mysterious women of Nod), the Rephaim (giants descended from the Nephilim), the Kadmonites, the Perizzites and other cursed tribes without a lineage from Seth.

‘Adam: The Patriarch of One Race’ https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/adam-the-patriarch-of-one-race/

‘The Origins of the Serpent Seed’

‘The Origins of the Non-Adamic Races’

For an understanding of where God stands concerning Esau-Edom see Malachi 1.2-3 and the book of Obadiah. The Edomites are one of the most cursed tribes of Scripture and their eventual utter destruction is prophecied throughout the writings of the prophets.

‘Christ Mocked (The Crowning with Thorns)’
–Pietro della Vecchia

The Edomites descended from Abraham’s race-mixing grandson Esau, and on their maternal side they descended from a conglomeration of non-Adamic tribes which the Edomites had been joined to since their first generation. Esau-Edom had fallen from a high place as the firstborn of Isaac to a lowly place as the most despised nation of Scripture because of his fornication.

‘Fornication, Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation’ https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/03/06/fornication-adultery-and-idolatry-a-biblical-case-against-miscegenation/

The Edomites were of a vile spirit after their profane, idolatrous, fornicating ancestors and so they would naturally be opposed to the gospel of Christ, but they had other reasons for despising Christ’s ministry.

The Edomites had only recently solidified their power in Judaea but were well on their way to complete racial and political domination. Esau has long coveted Jacob’s covenant with God, and has constantly sought to do harm to Israel.

“41And Esau was angry with Jacob because of the blessing, with which his father blessed him; and Esau said in his mind, Let the days of my father’s mourning draw nigh, that I may slay my brother Jacob.”
-Genesis 27

A religious reformation in Judaea threatened their newly found dominance of Judaeanism and all they had murdered and bribed to achieve. Thus these infiltrators were zealous enemies of Christ and his followers by necessity.

These Edomitish enemies of Christ are the false Judaeans which Christ warned the assembly at Smyrna about in Revelation 2.9 and 3.9:

“I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Judeans, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.”
-Revelation 2.9

“Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Judeans, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.”
-Revelation 3.9

There is only one people who gathers in synagogues and who claim to be Judaeans. Thus the identity of the guilty party is obvious.

‘The Judas Kiss’ -Gustave Dore.

Throughout the New Testament these Edomite Judaeans are referred to as “offspring [Strong’s G1081] of vipers” (Matthew 3:7, Luke 3.7, Matthew 23:33). This is a clear reference to Genesis 3.15:

“15 I will put enmities between thee [the serpent] and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel.”
-Genesis 3

Here in Mathhew 23 Jesus accuses their brood of spilling the blood of Abel:

““29 Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! Because you build the tombs of the prophets and adorn the monuments of the righteous, 30 and you say ‘If we were in the days of our fathers, we would not have been their partners in the blood of the prophets! 31 Thusly you bear witness against yourselves, that you are sons of those who murdered the prophets, 32 and you shall fulfill the measure of your fathers! 33 Serpents! Race [G1081] of vipers! How could you escape from the judgment of Gehenna? 34 For this reason, behold! I send to you prophets and wise men and scribes. Some of them you shall kill and crucify, and some of them you shall flog in your assembly halls and persecute from city to city! 35 Thusly should come upon you all the righteous blood poured out upon the earth, from the blood of the righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharios who had been murdered between the temple and the altar. 36 Truly I say to you, all these things shall come upon this race [G1074]!””
-Matthew 23

Gennemata (Strong’s G1081) is defined as “offspring” (Strong’s s.v.), or “the offspring or progeny of men” (Thayer s.v.). Genean (G1074) means “race, stock, family” (Liddell and Scott s.v.) or “men of the same stock, a family” (Thayer s.v.).

The Scriptures do not inform us of how the prophets each died, but on occasions when the priests of God are murdered we see characters such as Jezebel the Canaanitess or Doeg the Edomite responsible.

Christ holds their race responsible for all the righteous blood shed upon the earth from Abel unto Zacharias, the father of John the Baptist. This links one race from Cain in Eden to the 1st century Judaeans.

Christ was speaking to the scribes and Pharisees. The Pharisees were a mix of Israelites and Edomites like the rest of the 1st century Judaeans, but the scribes may have had among them Kenites, as some Kenites (sons of Cain) had been employed as scribes by the Judahites even before the Edomites began to be absorbed into Judaea (1 Chronicles 2.55).

‘The Arrest of Christ and the Kiss of Judas’
-Lippo Memmi.

Even in more ancient times the Israelite tribes of Judah, Benjamin and Levi that would form the Kingdom of Judah had struggled with miscegenation and cohabitation with the Kenites and Canaanites. In Genesis 38.1-5 we read that Judah married Shuah, a Canaanitess who bore him three mongrel sons, Er, Onan and Shelah. While Er and Onan were both slain by God, Shelah lived and his descendants remained among Judah as we see in Numbers 26.20.

Only thanks to the wit of Tamar did Judah have Adamic posterity and we see that the sons of Tamar were counted as the first and second born of Judah. This is despite the fact that Shelah was their elder brother, proving the illegitimate status of the Canaanite mongrel. In Judges 1.21 we find that the Canaanite tribe of the Jebusites settled among the tribe of Benjamin in Jerusalem and we find in Joshua 15.63 that these Jebusites remained there.

The Kenites had become absorbed into the Canaanite nations at an early time, and Esau-Edom had become absorbed partially into the Canaanites, thus all three tribal groups carried some of Cain’s DNA. It is also likely that many of the Judaean elders were Canaanites themselves (Zechariah 14.21, Susanna 1.56) and so it’s possible all three cursed lineages had direct descendants in the 1st century Judaean populace, particularly among scribes and Pharisees. Thus Christ rightly accuses their brood of shedding the blood of Abel and Zacharias, and of all the righteous priests of God.

‘Susanna and the Elders’ -Peter Paul Rubens.

In John chapter 8 Christ tells this race in no uncertain terms that they are descended from the Devil:

“38 The things which I have seen from My Father I speak; so also you, the things which you have heard from your father you do.” 39 They replied and said to Him: “Our father is Abraham!” Yahshua says to them: “If you are children of Abraham, you would have done the works of Abraham! 40 But now you seek to kill Me, a man whom has spoken to you the truth which I have heard from Yahweh. This Abraham has not done. 41 You do the works of your father!” Then they said to Him: “We were not born of fornication! We have one father, Yahweh!” 42 Yahshua said to them: “If Yahweh was your father you would have loved Me, for I have come from of Yahweh and am here. I have not come by Myself, but He has sent Me. 43 For what reason do you not perceive My speech? Because you are not able to hear My Word! 44 You are the sons of a father: the False Accuser! And you wish to do the desires of your father! He was a murderer from the beginning and did not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him! When he speaks a lie, he speaks from of his own devices, because he is a liar and the father of it! 45 Now because I speak the truth, you do not believe Me. 46 Who from among you censures Me concerning wrongdoing? If I speak truth, for what reason do you not believe Me? 47 He who is from of Yahweh hears the words of Yahweh. For this reason you do not hear, because you are not from of Yahweh!””
-John 8

‘Christ Before Caiaphas’ -Albrecht Durer.

After Jesus states that they have a different father than his own and that theirs is the Devil these Judaeans are immediately defensive saying “we are not born of fornication”. This indicates that they well knew that he was referring to their ancestry. He continues to affirm his accusation by saying that their father is the father of lies and a murderer from the beginning. These Judaean’s denial of their bastardized heritage in verse 41 is a reference to Malachi 2 where we find that Judah has married the daughter of a strange God.

“10Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why then doth every one of us despise his brother, violating the covenant of our fathers?

11Juda hath transgressed, and abomination hath been committed in Israel, and in Jerusalem: for Juda hath profaned the holiness of the Lord, which he loved, and hath married the daughter of a strange god.

12The Lord will cut off the man that hath done this, both the master, and the scholar, out of the tabernacles of Jacob, and him that offereth an offering to the Lord of hosts.”
-Malachi 2

‘The Kiss of Judas’ -Ary Scheffer.

This of course refers to the mingling of the sons of Judah with the daughters of Canaan who indeed descended in part from the devil’s brood. Thus Jesus rightly tells them they do the deeds of their father the devil. One may descend paternally from the patriarchs but if one is born of fornication they are cut off.

‘Fornication, Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation’ https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/03/06/fornication-adultery-and-idolatry-a-biblical-case-against-miscegenation/

In Romans chapter 9 Paul discusses these circumstances concerning the Edomites at some length. He first expresses his concern “for the brethren” his “kinsmen in regards to the flesh: those who are Israelites” in verses 1-5.

“I speak the truth among the Anointed, I lie not, my conscience bearing witness with me in the Holy Spirit, 2 that grief for me is great, and distress incessant in my heart, 3 for I have prayed that I myself would be accursed from the Anointed for the brethren, my kinsmen in regards to the flesh; 4 those who are Israelites, whose is the position of sons, and the honor, and the covenants, and the legislation, and the service, and the promises; 5 whose are the fathers; and of whom are the Anointed in regards to the flesh, being over all blessed of God for the ages. Truly.”
-Romans 9

He then goes on to say that “not all those who are from Israel are those of Israel” in verse 6 and relates this to the enduring posterity of Isaac which was found not in Esau but Jacob who diligently sought a Shemitic wife while Esau married Canaanites.

Da Vinci’s ‘The Last Supper’
-Giacomo Raffaelli.

“34And Esau was forty years old; and he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beoch the Chettite, and Basemath, daughter of Helon the Chettite. 35And they were provoking to Isaac and Rebecca.”
-Genesis 26

In his epistle to the Hebrews St. Paul describes Esau as a fornicator and profane person. His act of fornication was miscegenation and he is never recorded as having had extramarital or incestuous sexual relations. Rather his marriages themselves were condemned because his wives were taken of the mongrel Canaanites.

“14 Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:

15 Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled;

16 Lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.”
-Hebrews 12

Rebecca was so distraught she saw no worth in her life if Jacob would marry racial aliens like Esau did.

“46And Rebecca said to Isaac, I am weary of my life, because of the daughters of the sons of Chet; if Jacob shall take a wife of the daughters of this land, wherefore should I live?”
-Genesis 27

At Isaac’s behest Jacob went to his uncle Laban (meaning “White”) in Mesopotamia to find a kindred wife who would bear the children of the promise.

“1And Isaac having called for Jacob, blessed him, and charged him, saying, Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of the Chananites. 2Rise and depart quickly into Mesopotamia, to the house of Bathuel the father of thy mother, and take to thyself thence a wife of the daughters of Laban thy mother’s brother. 3And may my God bless thee, and increase thee, and multiply thee, and thou shalt become gatherings of nations.”
-Genesis 28

‘The Mockery of Christ’ -Ol auf Holz.

Turning again to Romans 9 we see that the children of the flesh in verse 8 are contrasted with the children of the promise which the following verses show to be inherited by birth through Isaac and Jacob.

“6 Not, however, that the word of Yahweh has failed; since not all those who are from Israel are those of Israel: 7 nor because they are offspring of Abraham all children: but, “In Isaac will your offspring be called.” 8 That is to say, the children of the flesh, these are not children of Yahweh, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring. 9 Indeed this word of promise: “At the appointed time I will come, and there will be a son for Sarah.” 10 And not only, but Rebekka also had conceived from one, by Isaak our father. 11 Then not yet having been born, nor having performed any good or evil, (that the purpose of Yahweh concerning the chosen endures, not from rituals, but from the calling,) 12 to her it was said, “the elder will serve the younger:” 13 just as it is written, “Jakob I love, and Esau I hated.””
-Romans 9

Some will say that those who Paul says are not of Israel in the land of Israel are actually just Israelites whose status as such has been revoked on account of disbelief, but another passage of Romans refutes this notion.

“25 For I do not wish you to be ignorant, brethren, of this mystery, lest you be wise on account of yourselves, that hardness in part has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Nations arrives. 26 And in that manner all of Israel shall be delivered; just as it is written, “From out of Zion shall come the Deliverer, and He shall turn away impiety from Jakob.” 27 “And this to them is the covenant from Me, when I should remove their guilt.” 28 Certainly concerning the good message, they are on your account enemies; but concerning the chosen, beloved on account of the fathers. 29 Indeed the favor and the calling of Yahweh are not to be repented of.”
-Romans 11

So we see that even those Israelites who reject the Gospel are still beloved for the father’s sakes and are not cast off from the election. Thus those in Israel who are not of Israel can only be the Edomite, Canaanite and Kenite infiltrators.

‘Judas Iscariot’ -Andre Duterte.

Continuing with Romans 9, St. Paul goes on to contrast Jacob-Israel and Esau-Edom in the following verses of chapter 9. In verse 22 he calls these Edomites and other enemies of God “vessels fit for destruction”. Clearly Paul well knew the heritage of his Edomite adversaries.

In 1 John 2 John warns his readers of the anti-Christs. Notice that the anti-Christs have already been born (ginomai, G1096) and that they came out from us but were not of us. This perfectly describes the Kenites, Edomites and mixed Judaeans. These came out from Eve, Abraham, Isaac and even Judah, Benjamin and Levi, but were not truly of us on account of their spurious origins. Of course these anti-Christs deny that Jesus is the Christ and so deny the Father and the Son. To this day their denial defines their Satanic ethno-religion.

18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now many antichrists have been born; whereby we know that it is the last time.

19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.

20 But ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know all things.

21 I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it, and that no lie is of the truth.

22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.”
-1 John 2

‘The Kiss of Judas’ -Ol auf Holz.

It is evident in numerous places all throughout the prophets and the New Testament that trees, vines and other plant life symbolize people, families, nations and races. I hope to have established this idiom in other writings.

‘The Origins of the Serpent Seed’ https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-origins-of-the-serpent-seed/

Jeremiah prophecied of the corruption of the stock of Judaea in chapter 24. Here the prophet refers to the Edomites and halfbreeds of Judaea as “bad figs” and the Israelites of Judaea as “good figs”.

“1The Lord shewed me two baskets of figs, lying in front of the temple of the Lord, after Nabuchodonosor king of Babylon had carried captive Jechonias son of Joakim king of Juda, and the princes, and the artificers, and the prisoners, and the rich men out of Jerusalem, and had brought them to Babylon. 2The one basket was full of very good figs, as the early figs; and the other basket was full of very bad figs, which could not be eaten, for their badness. 3And the Lord said to me, What seest thou, Jeremias? and I said, Figs; the good figs, very good; and the bad, very bad, which cannot be eaten, for their badness.

4And the word of the Lord came to me, saying, 5Thus saith the Lord, the God of Israel; As these good figs, so will I acknowledge the Judeans that have been carried away captive, whom I have sent forth out of this place into the land of the Chaldeans for good. 6And I will fix mine eyes upon them for good, and I will restore them into this land for good: and I will build them up, and not pull them down; and I will plant them, and not pluck them up. 7And I will give them a heart to know me, that I am the Lord: and they shall be to me a people, and I will be to them a God: for they shall turn to me with all their heart.

8And as the bad figs, which cannot be eaten, for their badness; thus saith the Lord, So will I deliver Sedekias king of Juda, and his nobles, and the remnant of Jerusalem, them that are left in this land, and the dwellers in Egypt. 9And I will cause them to be dispersed into all the kingdoms of the earth, and they shall be for a reproach, and a proverb, and an object of hatred, and a curse, in every place whither I have driven them out.”
-Jeremiah 24

‘The Disembowelment of Judas’
-Giovanni Canavesio.

The prophet Jeremiah speaks here of “the remnant of Jerusalem, them that are left in this land, and the dwellers in Egypt.” These are Judaeans who evaded the Babylonian captivity and remained in Judaea and neighbouring regions.

They came to be overwhelmed by the Edomites, Canaanites and others who moved into the lands of Israel and Judah after they were deported by the Assyrians and Babylonians.

The result was a nation partially comprised of paganized and racially impure Judaeans. These events predate even the Edomite conversion to Judaism in 125 BC. The fornication and heresy of Judah was known well to the prophet:

“20For of old thou hast broken thy yoke, and plucked asunder thy bands; and thou has said, I will not serve thee, but will go upon every high hill, and under every shady tree, there will I indulge in my fornication.

21Yet I planted thee a fruitful vine, entirely of the right sort: how art thou a strange vine turned to bitterness!

22Though thou shouldest wash thyself with nitre, and multiply to thyself soap, still thou art stained by thine iniquities before me, saith the Lord.”
-Jeremiah 2

These” bad figs” of Judah and the vision of Jeremiah are alluded to again in the New Testament when Christ twice cursed the fig tree upon finding the temple turned into a “den of theives” (Mark 11:12–14, 11:20–25, Matthew 21:18–22).

‘Judas’ Betrayal’, St. Clement Church, Ohrid, Macedonia.

The Edomites were found to have been in league with the Babylonian forces when they besieged Jerusalem. (Psalm 137:7-9; 1 Esdras 4:45 in the Septuagint). No doubt they were desirous of the land and cities of Judah and probably hoped the Babylonians would make their intrusion easier.

The Edomite’s conspiracy to inhabit the land of Israel was spoken of by the prophet Ezekiel in chapter 35 of his prophecy. Here we see they have conspired with Israel’s captors so they may inhabit the land and that God has promised to punish them severely for this.

“5Because thou hast been a perpetual enemy, and hast laid wait craftily for the house of Israel, with the hand of enemies with a sword, in the time of injustice, at the last: 6Therefore, as I live, saith the Lord God, verily thou hast sinned even to blood, therefore blood shall pursue thee. 7And I will make mount Seir a waste, and desolate, and I will destroy from off it men and cattle: 8and I will fill thy hills and thy valleys with slain men, and in all thy plains there shall fall in thee men slain with the sword. 9I will make thee a perpetual desolation, and thy cities shall not be inhabited any more: and thou shalt know that I am the Lord. 10Because thou saidst, The two nations and the two countries shall be mine, and I shall inherit them; whereas the Lord is there: 11therefore, as I live, saith the Lord, I will even deal with thee according to thine enmity, and I will be made known to thee when I shall judge thee: 12and thou shalt know that I am the Lord. I have heard the voice of thy blasphemies, whereas thou hast said, The desert mountains of Israel are given to us for food; 13and thou hast spoken swelling words against me with thy mouth: I have heard them. 14Thus saith the Lord; When all the earth is rejoicing, I will make thee desert. 15Thou shalt be desert, O mount Seir, and all Idumea; and it shall be utterly consumed: and thou shalt know that I am the Lord their God.”
-Ezekiel 35

They achieved their desire and the southern portion of the land of Judaea was known in Hellenistic and Roman times as Idumaea or Edom. The devil Judas Iscariot (according to Christ himself in John 6:70) who betrayed the Christ was himself an Edomite. Iscariot/Iskariotes (Strong’s G2469) is defined by Thayer as “men of Kerioth” and by Strong as “inhabitant of Kerioth; Iscariotes (i.e. Keriothite)”. Kerioth (el-Kureitein) was 10 miles south of Hebron in the region of Judaea known in the time of Christ as Idumaea.

‘Ecce Homo’ -Andrea Mantegna

To this day the devils cling to the land they have fought so hard to gain through bribery and murder and this is manifest in modern Zionism. Of this Malachi prophecied saying:

“2I have loved you, saith the Lord. And ye said, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob’s brother? saith the Lord: yet I loved Jacob, 3and hated Esau and laid waste his borders, and made his heritage as dwellings of the wilderness? 4Because one will say, Idumea has been overthrown, but let us return and rebuild the desolate places; thus saith the Lord Almighty, They shall build, but I will throw down; and they shall be called The borders of wickedness, and, The people against whom the Lord has set himself for ever.”
-Malachi 1

Millennia ago the Edomites were consorting with the Babylonians against Judah, bribing the Romans for client kingship and assassinating the Hasmoneans to gain a death grip on ancient Judaeanism and to establish themselves in the land of Canaan. Today they drive the Zionist war machine for the very same purpose: to pose as Israel and steal his birthright. Try as they may, God has spoken: “they shall build, but I shall throw down”.

This has hardly been a comprehensive treatment of this topic which one might easily write about for a good deal of time, but I hope to have here given a sufficient introduction to the topic.

‘The Arrest of Christ’, the Book of Kells.

“5My sword has been made drunk in heaven: behold, it shall come down upon Idumea, and with judgment upon the people doomed to destruction.

6The sword of the Lord is filled with blood, it is glutted with fat, with the blood of goats and lambs, and with the fat of goats and rams: for the Lord has a sacrifice in Bosor, and a great slaughter in Idumea.

7And the mighty ones shall fall with them, and the rams and the bulls; and the land shall be soaked with blood, and shall be filled with their fat.

8For it is the day of judgment of the Lord, and the year of the recompence of Sion in judgment.”
-Isaiah 34

“1Who is this that is come from Edom, with red garments from Bosor? thus fair in his apparel, with mighty strength? I speak of righteousness and saving judgment.

2Wherefore are thy garments red, and thy raiment as if fresh from a trodden winepress?

3I am full of trodden grape, and of the nations there is not a man with me; and I trampled them in my fury, and dashed them to pieces as earth, and brought down their blood to the earth.

4For the day of recompence has come upon them, and the year of redemption is at hand.

5And I looked, and there was no helper; and I observed, and none upheld: therefore my arm delivered them, and mine anger drew nigh.

6And I trampled them in mine anger, and brought down their blood to the earth.”
-Isaiah 63

‘The Arrest of Christ’ -Hans Holbein the Elder.

“16For as you have drunk upon my holy mountain, so all nations shall drink continually: and they shall drink, and sup up, and they shall be as though they were not.

17And in mount Sion shall be salvation, and it shall be holy, and the house of Jacob shall possess those that possessed them.

18And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau stubble: and they shall be kindled in them, and shall devour them: and there shall be no remains of the house of Esau, for the Lord hath spoken it.”

“1For, behold, a day comes burning as an oven, and it shall consume them; and all the aliens [allogenes, Strong’s G241], and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that is coming shall set them on fire, saith the Lord Almighty, and there shall not be left of them root or branch. 2But to you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise, and healing shall be in his wings: and ye shall go forth, and bound as young calves let loose from bonds. 3And ye shall trample the wicked; for they shall be ashes underneath your feet in the day which I appoint, saith the Lord Almighty.”
-Malachi 4 (LXX)

‘Disrobing of Christ’ -Master of the Karlsruhe Passion

Christianity: a “Desert Religion?”

‘The Return of Jacob to Canaan’
-Willem van Newland

Many detractors of Christianity like to slander the Faith with the pejorative “desert religion.” This is quite a display of ignorance on part of our opponents who seem to be oblivious to the nature and history of the Fertile Crescent. Certainly the land of milk and honey (Exodus 3.8, Numbers 13.27, Deuteronomy 6.3) was no desert.

The climate of the Holy Land has changed significantly since Biblical times and large swaths of the region that were once lush and temperate have been subjected to desertification. In addition, invading armies all but entirely depleted the forests of Palestine.

The change in the climate of Palestine and the deforestation of the region has been detailed by Ellsworth Huntington in the Bulletin of the American Geographical Society (vol. 40, no. 9 pp. 513-522). Much of Palestine today has been successfully reforested with indigenous flora, a testament to the fertility of the land.

The Roman author Pliny the Elder remarked upon “Jericho, covered with groves of palm-trees, and watered by numerous springs” as well as “En-Gedi, second only to Jerusalem in the fertility of its soil and its groves of palm-trees” (Natural History 5.15).

The Judean historian Flavius Josephus said of the Galileans that “their soil is universally rich and fruitful, and full of the plantations of trees of all sorts, insomuch that it invites the most slothful to take pains in its cultivation, by its fruitfulness” (Wars 3.42).

Of Samaria and Judea he tells us that “They have abundance of trees, and are full of autumnal fruit, both that which grows wild, and that which is the effect of cultivation” and “those rivers which they have, all their waters are exceedingly sweet: by reason also of the excellent grass they have, their cattle yield more milk than do those in other places”(ibid. 3.49-50).

Concerning the country about Gennesareth he says that “its nature is wonderful as well as its beauty; its soil is so fruitful that all sorts of trees can grow upon it, and the inhabitants accordingly plant all sorts of trees there; for the temper of the air is so well mixed, that it agrees very well with those several sorts” (ibid. 3.516).

Forests of the land of Canaan are mentioned throughout Scripture (Joshua 17.15, 1 Samuel 22.5, 2 Samuel 18.6, Ezekiel 34.25, Zechariah 11.2). The Israelites marvelled at the abundance of the land of Canaan when they first sent their scouts into the land (Numbers 13.23-27). Certainly the land of ancient Israel was no desert.

The Ethiopian Eunuch and Simon Niger: Negroe Saints?

Philip and the Ethiopian eunuch, Decani Monastery, Kosovo.

It can be demonstrated that the Ethiopian eunuch baptized by Philip in Acts chapter 8 was a Judaean serving in the Ethiopian court and not ethnically Ethiopian. This man was making a pilgrimage to the temple (vs. 27) where only Judaeans were permitted (Acts 21.28-29, 24.5-6, the Temple Warning inscription) and was in possession of a scroll containing the book of Isaiah (vs. 28). He was also converted before Cornelius and the agreement to convert the nations (Acts 10, 15.7). Judaeans are elsewhere referred to as Parthians, Medes, Elamites, Cretes and Arabians according to their residence and not their ethnicity (Acts 2.5-11) and this is certainly the case with the Ethiopian eunuch. The fact that the Ethiopian eunuch was a Judaean was also known to the early Christian writers Irenaeus and Pontius. Here in his work ‘Against Heresies’ (4.23.2) Irenaeus indicates that the Ethiopian eunuch was learned in the Scriptures:

“2. For this reason, also, Philip, when he had discovered the eunuch of the Ethiopians’ queen … immediately when [Philip] had baptized him, he departed from him. For nothing else [but baptism] was wanting to him who had been already instructed by the prophets: he was not ignorant of God the Father, nor of the rules as to the [proper] manner of life, but was merely ignorant of the advent of the Son of God, which, when he had become acquainted with, in a short space of time, he went on his way rejoicing, to be the herald in Ethiopia of Christ’s advent. Therefore Philip had no great labour to go through with regard to this man, because he was already prepared in the fear of God by the prophets. For this reason, too, did the apostles, collecting the sheep which had perished of the house of Israel, and discoursing to them from the Scriptures, prove that this crucified Jesus was the Christ, the Son of the living God; and they persuaded a great multitude, who, however, [already] possessed the fear of God. And there were, in one day, baptized three, and four, and five thousand men.”

One might, at a stretch, claim that the Ethiopian eunuch wasn’t necessarily a Judean just because he was familiar with Scripture, but the context provided by the very next passage in Irenaeus’ book (4.24.1) precludes that interpretation:

“1. Wherefore also Paul, since he was the apostle of the Gentiles, says, I laboured more than they all. For the instruction of the former, [the Judeans] was an easy task, because they could allege proofs from the Scriptures, and because they, who were in the habit of hearing Moses and the prophets, did also readily receive the First-begotten of the dead, and the Prince of the life of God, — Him who, by the spreading forth of hands, did destroy Amalek, and vivify man from the wound of the serpent, by means of faith which was [exercised] towards Him.”

Another early Christian source (‘The Life of St. Cyprian’ chapter 3) is very explicit that the Ethiopian eunuch was a Judean:

“3. The apostle’s epistle says that novices should be passed over, lest by the stupor of heathenism that yet clings to their unconfirmed minds, their untaught inexperience should in any respect sin against God. He first, and I think he alone, furnished an illustration that greater progress is made by faith than by time. For although in the Acts of the Apostles the eunuch is described as at once baptized by Philip, because he believed with his whole heart, this is not a fair parallel. For he was a Judean, and as he came from the temple of the Lord he was reading the prophet Isaiah, and he hoped in Christ, although as yet he did not believe that He had come; while the other, coming from the ignorant heathens, began with a faith as mature as that with which few perhaps have finished their course.”


The bust of Pescennius Niger, the Hall of Busts, Vatican.

Many claim that Simon “that was called Niger” (Acts 13.1) was so called on account of being a Negroe or otherwise non-Adamic. It is hardly unique for White people to be called black as we see in the use of the term Black Irish or the name Hugh the Black, a Frankish Duke of Burgundy in the 10th century. My own wife’s English maiden name is Black, and I assure you, she is no Negroe. Note that Niger (Strong’s G3526) in this context is a name of Latin origin (Strong’s and Thayer’s s.v.) and it was common for Romans to take the names of colours in reference to their hair colour (e.g. Rufus/red or Flavus/yellow, Oxford Latin Dictionary s.v.). The Roman Emperor Pescennius Niger was so called in reference to his swarthy neck which stood in contrast to the rest of his body (Historian Augusta, Life of Pescennius Niger 6.6).

The Jewish Ties of the Infamous Opponents of the Early Church

The bust of Nero, Capitoline, Rome, Italy.

Nero’s wife Poppaea Sabina was “a religious woman” who procured favour for the Jews (Josephus, Antiquities 20.159). She was buried according to Jewish custom as she wished (Tacitus, Annals 16.6, Histories 1.22) indicating that she was either a Jew, a Jewish proselyte or a “God-fearer” (Gentile supporter of Hellenistic Judaism).

Nero himself showed favour to the Jews expanding the borders of the kingdom of Herod Agrippa II (Josephus, Antiquities 20.159, Wars 2.252) and bestowing Armenia Minor upon Aristobulus, son of the Jewish king of Chalcis (Antiquities 20.158).

Nero is esteemed in the Talmud as an honoured convert to Judaism and the ancestor of the famous Rabbi Meir Baal Haness (Jewish Quarterly Review, vol. 59 no. 4, The Emperor Nero in Talmudic Legend, University of Pennsylvania Press p. 321 ff.). It is no coincidence that Nero persecuted Christianity so harshly.

The bust of Julian the Apostate, Louvre, Paris, France.

Julian the Apostate was the first pagan Emperor after Christianity was legalized in the Roman Empire. He promised the Jews that he would rebuild the temple destroyed by Christ’s people (Daniel 9.26, Romans 16.20). Apparently he also had no qualms about worshiping alongside Jews.

“Desiring to extend yet further favors to you, I have exhorted my brother, the venerable Patriarch Julos, to put a stop to the collection of the so-called Apostolé [a tax] among you; and henceforward no one will be able to oppress your people by the collection of such imposts, so that everywhere throughout my kingdom you may be free from care … when I return safely from the Persian war, I may restore the Holy City of Jerusalem, and rebuild it at my own expense, even as you have for so many years desired it to be restored; and therein will I unite with you in giving praise to the Almighty.”
-The Works of the Emperor Julian, Loeb Classical Library, volume 3, letter 51

‘The Satanic Origins of the Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews’

“22 Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.”
-Romans 11

Against the Lying Pen of the Scribes

‘Parable of the Wheat and the Tares’
-Abraham Bloemaert

It is an established historical fact that the Hasmonean ruler John Hyrcanus I conquered the Edomites in the late 2nd century BC, forcibly converted them to the religion of Judah and integrated the Edomites into the nation of Judah (Josephus, Antiquities 13.257-258, 13.395-397, Strabo, Geography 16.2.34 et al.). The conquest and mass conversion of any people, let alone a cursed and mongrelized people like Edom, was an unprecedented event in Israel’s history which had catastrophic results.

‘The Satanic Origins of the Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews’  https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-satanic-origins-of-the-edomite-jews/

The Jews of today are themselves descended from the Edomites and are thoroughly mixed with them, and therefore they find it necessary to justify and even praise the absorption of the Edomites into the nation of Judah. In the Masoretic Text of Amos 9 we read “In that day will I raise up the tabernacle of David that is fallen, and close up the breaches thereof; and I will raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old: That they may possess the remnant of Edom, and of all the heathen, which are called by my name” (vv. 11-12, King James Version).

The Edomite Jews of course interpret that this refers to the conversion of their ancestors during the reign of Hyrcanus I. There are many points of apparent conflict with other Scriptures in this interpretation (Ezekiel 35, Isaiah 34, Obadiah, Malachi 1.2-4, Romans 9 et al.), but there is a simple resolution. Most modern Old Testament translations are based upon the Masoretic Text of the Jews, but the Greek Septuagint version of the Old Testament provides a different reading which is certainly more consistent with Scripture.

“11In that day I will raise up the tabernacle of David that is fallen, and will rebuild the ruins of it, and will set up the parts thereof that have been broken down, and will build it up as in the ancient days:
12that the remnant of men, and all the Gentiles upon whom my name is called, may earnestly seek me, saith the Lord who does all these things.”
-Amos 9 (Brenton’s Septuagint)

Where the Masoretic Text has אדום/Edom (Strong’s H123) the Septuagint has ανθρώπων/men (Strong’s G444). This reading gives a very different picture of the prophecy which is much more consistent with the rest of Scripture. It is apparent here that the Septuagint translators read אדם/Adam (H120) where the Masoretes read אדום/Edom. Aside from the vowel markings of the Masoretes, the ו/vav is the only thing to distinguish the Hebrew words אדם and אדום and the addition of a single simple line (ו) to the text transforms the message. Ostensibly this corruption of the text must predate Jerome’s Latin Vulgate translation (late 4th century AD) which has Idumeae/Edom in this verse.

It is evident from the reading of Amos 9.7 in the elder Septuagint, which preceded the Vulgate by over 5 centuries and which was favoured by the early Church, that this prophecy refers to the remnant of Adamic man called back to God through Israel under the New Covenant. It is certainly not a prophecy of the integration of Edom into the nation of Judah. The unchanging God never changed his mind about Edom who has been condemned of God since ancient times, but God has always had a plan for the redemption of the authentic seed of Adam.

‘The Tree of Life: Redemption of the Adamic Race’

Obadiah 1.18 states that “the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau stubble: and they shall be kindled in them, and shall devour them: and there shall be no remains of the house of Esau”. Would the God of Jacob be a God unto “the remnant of Edom” only to later have Israel ensure that “there shall be no remains of the house of Esau”? Why would God annihilate his own authentic followers?

The Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews dread the righteous judgement of our God upon Edom and all the aliens, and this has influenced their textual traditions of the Old Testament in another place; Malachi 4.1. The Masoretic Text reads here “behold, the day cometh, that shall burn as an oven; and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble” (King James Version). The Septuagint however, gives a different reading.

“1For, behold, a day comes burning as an oven, and it shall consume them; and all the aliens [αλλογενείς, Strong’s G241], and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that is coming shall set them on fire, saith the Lord Almighty, and there shall not be left of them root or branch. 2But to you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise, and healing shall be in his wings: and ye shall go forth, and bound as young calves let loose from bonds. 3And ye shall trample the wicked; for they shall be ashes underneath your feet in the day which I appoint, saith the Lord Almighty.”
-Malachi 4 (Brenton’s Septuagint)

Here in Malachi 4.1 the LXX translators apparently read a resh where the Masoretes read (or corrupted to) a dalet instead. Thus the Masoretes have zedim (plural of H2086) where the LXX translators read zarim (plural of H2114) and translated αλλογενείς (G241) meaning “of another race” (Liddell and Scott s.v.) or “sprung from another race” (Thayer s.v.). Compare zedim/זדים and zarim/זרים.

The same scribal error (or corruption) has been noted elsewhere by other scholars. In a note for Psalm 54.3 the Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges states that “This verse is repeated almost verbatim in Psalm 86:14 (a mosaic constructed of fragments of other Psalms), with the change, accidental or intentional, of strangers into proud. The consonants of the Heb. words zârîm, strangers, and zêḏîm, proud, are almost identical, and some Heb. MSS. and the Targ. read zêḏîm here; but the rest of the versions support the Massoretic Text”. Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers corroborates this under the entry for Psalm 54.3 stating “This verse, with some variations, occurs again (Psalm 86:14); some MSS. even reading here “proud,” instead of “strangers.””

There are several other examples of dalet/resh confusion evident in a comparison of the LXX and MT. For example at 1 Samuel 22.9 Doeg is called a Syrian in the LXX where the translators apparently read ארמ/Arammiy (H761) instead of אדמ/Edomiy (H130). Another example is Genesis 10.4 where in the MT we have דדנים/Dodanim (H1721) while the LXX translators read רדנים/Rodanim (H7290c) and translated as Rhodians. Other examples can be found.

That the Septuagint reading of Malachi 4.1 is most accurate is evident in the New Testament in Jesus’ parable of the wheat and the tares when Christ uttered “things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world” (Matthew 13.35). In this parable recorded in Matthew 13 Jesus tells us that the weeds sown in the field of wheat were planted by an enemy (vv. 25, 28) who is the devil and whose children are the weeds (vv. 38, 39). Does the devil go about planting evil spirits in vessels created by God? Nay, Satan has no such power over the spirits and bodies that God has created. The children sown by the devil are the same aliens refered to in Malachi 4.1 whose fate is the lake of fire.

‘Adam: The Patriarch of One Race’

‘The Origins of the Serpent Seed’

‘The Origins of the Non-Adamic Races’

“8 How do you say: We are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us? Indeed the lying pen of the scribes hath wrought falsehood.”
-Jeremiah 8

Against the Judaizers

‘The Meeting of Abraham and Melchizedek’
-Peter Paul Rubens

Many Identity Christians, realizing the continuity between ancient Israel and Western Christian civilization, have seen fit to take up many of the customs of the Law of Moses. While this choice may be inspired by healthy feelings of patriotism and a desire to conform to God’s will, it is certainly misguided. This is a controversial view to hold within Christian Identity, and many would consider mine an anti-nomian position. Hopefully by the end of this presentation it will be clear that this position is not anti-nomian, and that the opposition are in fact continuing in an old heresy which the Apostles themselves contended against: Judaizing.

It is now pertinent to discuss what exactly Judaizing is. The word Judaize (Ioudaizo, Strong’s G2450) only appears once in our New Testament in reference to this heresy (Galatians 2.14). There St. Paul is addressing an error within the early Church and how he corrected it. In Galatians 2 St. Paul recounts how some of the Judeans would not publicly associate with the uncircumcised Greeks, Romans and Syrians in the Church. St. Paul then chastises them for this:

“14But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Judean, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Judeans, why compellest thou the Gentiles to Judaize [ioudaizein]?”

There is one other use of the term Judaize in the canonical books of the Bible; Esther 8.17. While there are disputes both ancient and modern as to the canonicity and historicity of the book of Esther, I do not feel qualified to speak on the matter, but here the Greek text of Esther 8.17 is useful to shed some light on how Judaizing was understood among Judean Grecephones in antiquity. Here in Esther 8 the Persian king declares that the Judeans in his satrapies were to be permitted to exercise their own laws and defend themselves from their oppressors. In fear of the power of the Judeans many are said to have converted to Judaism:

“17In every city and province wherever the ordinance was published: wherever the proclamation took place, the Judeans had joy and gladness, feasting and mirth: and many of the Gentiles were circumcised, and were Judaized [ioudaizon], for fear of the Judeans.”

Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance defines Ioudaizo as “to become a Judaean, i.e. “Judaize””. Judaizers are mentioned once in the work of Flavius Josephus (Wars of the Judeans 2.18.2) where he tells us “when the Syrians thought they had ruined the Judeans, they had the Judaizers in suspicion also … as if they were certainly foreigners”.

The 2nd century Christian writer Ignatius, in his Epistle to the Magnesians, wrote that “It is absurd to profess Christ Jesus, and to Judaize. For Christianity did not embrace Judaism, but Judaism Christianity” (10.3). Christianity was not to be a new sect of ancient Judaism subject to the Judean traditions and clinging to the Old Covenant; rather it was a New Covenant with both the house of Israel and the house of Judah (Jeremiah 31.31-32, Hebrews 8.8-9).

From these four ancient sources it can be clearly seen that Judaizing is the adoption of Judean customs. When I call someone a Judaizer or their doctrine Judaizing, I am not slandering them as a lover or follower of the synagogue of Satan which presents itself as Judaism today; rather I am stating simply that they are following in this same ancient error which was recognized by St. Paul. The charge is no more or no less than that.

Now many will undoubtedly be thinking that the Law of Moses was not unique to the Kingdom of Judah or the province of Judea; it was given to the 12 tribes of Israel. It is a part of our heritage. This is true, but just because the Mosaic Law is part of the history of our 12 tribes does not necessarily mean that it is something which binds us to this day. The Law of Moses which was given to our people at Sinai is the body of conditions to the covenant made at Sinai. The Sinaitic Covenant was dependent upon Israel’s obedience to the Law of Moses (Exodus 19.5-6, Leviticus 26.14 ff., Deuteronomy 28.15 ff.) and when we broke the Old Covenant, so did God. Here are a few passages that show that the house of Israel was divorced from God and the Old Covenant:

10And I took my rod that was called Beauty, and I cut it asunder to make void my covenant, which I had made with all people. 11And it was made void in that day: and so the poor of the flock that keep for me, understood that it is the word of the Lord. 12And I said to them: If it be good in your eyes, bring hither my wages: and if not, be quiet. And they weighed for my wages thirty pieces of silver. 13And the Lord said to me: Cast it to the statuary, a handsome price, that I was prized at by them. And I took the thirty pieces of silver, and I cast them into the house of the Lord to the statuary. 14And I cut off my second rod that was called a Cord, that I might break the brotherhood between Juda and Israel.
-Zechariah 11

“1Say to your brother, My people, and to your sister, Pitied. 2Plead with your mother, plead: for she is not my wife, and I am not her husband: and I will remove her fornication out of my presence, and her adultery from between her breasts: 3that I may strip her naked, and make her again as she was at the day of her birth: and I will make her desolate, and make her as a dry land, and will kill her with thirst.”
-Hosea 2

“1Thus saith the Lord, Of what kind is your mother’s bill of divorcement, by which I put her away? or to which debtor have I sold you? Behold, ye are sold for your sins, and for your iniquities have I put your mother away.”
-Isaiah 50

“6And the Lord said to me in the days of Josias the king, Hast thou seen what things the house of Israel has done to me? they have gone on every high mountain, and under every shady tree, and have committed fornication there. 7And I said after she had committed all these acts of fornication, Turn again to me. Yet she returned not. And faithless Juda saw her faithlessness. 8And I saw that (for all the sins of which she was convicted, wherein the house of Israel committed adultery, and I put her away, and gave into her hands a bill of divorcement,) yet faithless Juda feared not, but went and herself also committed fornication.”
-Jeremiah 3

“31Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Juda: 32not according to the covenant which I made with their fathers in the day when I took hold of their hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; for they abode not in my covenant, and I disregarded them, saith the Lord.”
-Jeremiah 31

Some of the Judaizers within Christian Identity will claim that the Mosaic Law is a primordial code always known to Adamic man and that it was only later codified and written down concisely at Sinai, but this is in direct conflict with Scripture. St. Paul states in Galatians 3 that “the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul” (vs. 17). How could the Law of Moses go back to Adam if the Law of Moses came 430 years after the establishment of the covenant with his descendant Abraham?

Did God cast Adam from the garden for not wearing garments conforming to the Law of Moses? No; Adam had been naked and he was punished for breaking the only law he knew: “of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil—of it ye shall not eat”. Were the antediluvian Adamites punished for eating swine? No; they were punished for the same sin as their father Adam. There was no Mosaic Law known to Adamic man before the Sinaitic Covenant.

‘Why Were the Antediluvian Adamites Punished?’

We know from the records in the Pentateuch that the Mosaic Law and the Sinaitic Covenant indeed came long after the Abrahamic Covenant, and it is clear in the New Testament that the New Covenant is founded on the promises of the Abrahamic Covenant; not the later Sinaitic Covenant which was broken long ago. Here in Romans 4 St. Paul makes this amply clear:

6 Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works, 7 Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered. 8 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin. 9 Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also? for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness. 10 How was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision. 11 And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also: 12 And the father of circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision only, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised. 13 For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. 14 For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect: 15 Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression. 16 Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all, 17 (As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were. 18 Who against hope believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations, according to that which was spoken, So shall thy seed be.”

So we see that because Abraham believed, God promised to justify his offspring. If you are of the seed of promise through Isaac and Jacob, you are party to those promises. Clearly the New Covenant and the hope we have in Christ is founded on the promises of the Abrahamic Covenant and not the broken Sinaitic Covenant. Paul affirms the Abrahamic foundation of the New Covenant again in Hebrews 6 where he relates the Abrahamic promise to Christ’s sacrifice and priestly status in the order of Melchizedek:

13 For when God made promise to Abraham, because he could swear by no greater, he sware by himself, 14 Saying, Surely blessing I will bless thee, and multiplying I will multiply thee. 15 And so, after he had patiently endured, he obtained the promise. 16 For men verily swear by the greater: and an oath for confirmation is to them an end of all strife. 17 Wherein God, willing more abundantly to shew unto the heirs of promise the immutability of his counsel, confirmed it by an oath: 18 That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us: 19 Which hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and stedfast, and which entereth into that within the veil; 20 Whither the forerunner is for us entered, even Jesus, made an high priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.”

Here in Luke 1 St. Zacharias, the father of St. John the Baptist, prophecies of his son’s purpose to prepare the way for the Christ who would fulfill God’s oath to Abraham. Like Paul, Zacharias saw the Christ as fulfilling the promises made to Abraham long before the Law of Moses was given:

“67 And his father Zacharias was filled with the Holy Ghost, and prophesied, saying, 68 Blessed be the Lord God of Israel; for he hath visited and redeemed his people, 69 And hath raised up an horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David; 70 As he spake by the mouth of his holy prophets, which have been since the world began: 71 That we should be saved from our enemies, and from the hand of all that hate us; 72 To perform the mercy promised to our fathers, and to remember his holy covenant; 73 The oath which he sware to our father Abraham, 74 That he would grant unto us, that we being delivered out of the hand of our enemies might serve him without fear, 75 In holiness and righteousness before him, all the days of our life. 76 And thou, child, shalt be called the prophet of the Highest: for thou shalt go before the face of the Lord to prepare his ways; 77 To give knowledge of salvation unto his people by the remission of their sins, 78 Through the tender mercy of our God; whereby the dayspring from on high hath visited us, 79 To give light to them that sit in darkness and in the shadow of death, to guide our feet into the way of peace.”

If the Apostles and saints believed that the Abrahamic Covenant was the foundation of our Christian faith, who is any man today to doubt this? The house of Israel broke the Old Covenant and was divorced by God with the promise of a future covenant to be made “not according to the covenant which I made with their fathers in the day when I took hold of their hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt”. What purpose then could it serve to adopt the Mosaic Law, the conditions of the Sinaitic Covenant? More to the point; is this what Christ and the Apostles taught us to do?

In Acts 15 we see that there was a “sect of the Pharisees” (vs. 5) who had established themselves within the Church and were teaching that the nations had to be circumcised and adopt the Law of Moses. The Apostles took council about this matter and eventually St. James proposed what they ought to decree:

“19 Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God: 20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.”

The whole council of Jerusalem agreed and this decree was sent out to the Christians of Antioch (vv. 22-29). If the Apostles thought the Roman world should exclude pork from its diet or that the Greeks should sew fringes to their togas or thought that any other parts of the Law of Moses needed to be upheld by Christians, this would be the time to decree it, but they did not. Rather they provided us with a short and simple set of laws which are similar to laws known in the patriarchal age in our Old Testament (e.g. Genesis 9.3-5, 26.34-35, Hebrews 12.16 et al.). How then can one rightfully reprimand a Christian brother who does not keep the Law of Moses when the council of the Apostles wrote against those Pharisees who compelled Christians to take up the Law of Moses?

There are some who would agree that Christians are not bound to the Law of Moses, but who hold a special contempt for those who eat pork, shellfish or duck etc. and such people often claim that these foods are not in fact considered food in a Biblical context. I would dispute this position. While the Mosaic Law prohibits eating these things, and the Judeans might have considered eating them to be strange, the Greco-Roman world consumed vast amounts of pork, ducks, geese, shellfish and even snails and dormice (John E. Stambaugh, The Ancient Roman City, JHU Press p. 148, Maguelonne Toussaint-Samat, A History of Food, John Wiley & Sons p. 93). Surely that would have been considered by both the Judaizers and by the Apostles when they wrote their letter to the Christians in Antioch.

Before the Law of Moses was given no dietary laws against eating pork or shellfish etc. appear in our Scriptures. Adam and the family of Noah were permitted to eat “every herb bearing seed upon the earth, and all trees that have in themselves seed of their own kind” (Genesis 1.29) and the seed of Noah was also permitted to eat “every thing that moveth and liveth” except of course flesh full of its blood (Genesis 9.3-4). I do not dispute that the dietary rules in the Mosaic Law provide guidance that can benefit our health, but I must strongly oppose insulting or alienating people who do not adhere to them.

St. Paul, as the Apostle to the nations, was faced with the task of trying to protect the congregations which he had established among the nations from the doctrines of the Judaizers. On account of this his letters contain a great deal of information about the heresy of Judaizing. Many Judaizers today reject St. Paul, labeling him a false Apostle. They (correctly) see the Scriptures which Paul authored as an affront to their doctrine and think that, without Paul interfering, they might be able to persuade you to be Judaized. I will not here make any effort to defend Paul as a better scholar has already refuted Paul’s opponents at great length and has left no stone unturned.


Instead I will present some excerpts from St. Paul’s letters which bear witness against the Judaizers. The Galatians were afflicted harshly by the Judaizers and so Paul’s epistle to them largely consists of polemics against these heretics. Here in Galatians 5 Paul admonishes the Galatians to not submit to circumcision or to take up the Law of Moses:

“1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. 2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. 3 For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. 4 Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace. 5 For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. 6 For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.”

The “yoke of bondage” here is a reference to the Law of Moses (Acts 15.5-10) with which the Judaizers sought to burden the nations. This is amply clear when Paul goes on to explain that he who gets himself circumcised is indebted to do the whole law. In chapter 6 Paul goes on to declare the vanity of the Judaizers:

“12 As many as desire to make a fair shew in the flesh, they constrain you to be circumcised; only lest they should suffer persecution for the cross of Christ. 13 For neither they themselves who are circumcised keep the law; but desire to have you circumcised, that they may glory in your flesh. 14 But God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom the world is crucified unto me, and I unto the world. 15 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature. 16 And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God.”

In 1 Corinthians 7 Paul writes “Is any man called being circumcised? let him not become uncircumcised. Is any called in uncircumcision? let him not be circumcised”. This is very simple and direct instruction, yet some will perform extraordinary mental gymnastics to deny the obvious meaning. St. Paul never taught that those converting to Christianity from among the nations ought to become circumcised.

Some will undoubtedly argue that the covenant of circumcision was a requirement of the Abrahamic Covenant, however the Abrahamic Covenant was confirmed in chapter 15 of Genesis (vs. 18) and only later in chapter 17 is the condition of circumcision added. (vv. 10-14). Recall now Paul’s words cited earlier: “for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness. … Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision. And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised” (Romans 4.9-11). The immutable promise of God to Abraham is not dependent upon circumcision.

Those who would have Christians subjected to circumcision will point to Genesis 17.13 where circumcision is refered to as an “everlasting [H5769, G166] covenant”, but the same words (owlam in Hebrew and aionios in Greek) are elsewhere used of Levitical rites (Exodus 27.21, Leviticus 6.22, Numbers 10.8 et al.), some even pertaining to sacrifice. Would the Judaizers have us believe that Christendom is required to have a Levitical priesthood offering sacrifices? Will Christ’s sacrifice and the New Covenant never satisfy them? Owlam may be read as “long time”, “time out of mind”, “lasting” or “long time” (Strong’s s.v.) and aionios is defined as “age-long” (Dodson s.v.) or “lasting for an age” (Liddell and Scott s.v.). That age has surely passed along with a valid Levitical priesthood and the need for circumcision of the flesh.

It ought to be noted here that the ancient Israelite practice of circumcision differed greatly from the later Jewish custom widely practiced in the Jewish, Islamic and American worlds today. I will not get into any grisly details here, but suffice it to say that Jewish circumcision is a horrific mockery of the Biblical rite of circumcision. Perhaps Paul is referring to these disturbed adaptations of the rite of circumcision in Philippians 3.2 where he warns of the Judaizers saying “beware the mutilation”.

‘The Jewish Perversion of the Biblical Rite of Circumcision’

In Exodus 17 we read “the child of eight days old shall be circumcised by you … the uncircumcised male, who shall not be circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin on the eighth day, that soul shall be utterly destroyed from its family, for he has broken my covenant” (vv. 10-14). How then can a grown man, or even a child of 9 days benefit from circumcision? It is impossible. Thank God that He has restored us to Israel under the New Covenant and our circumcision is of the heart (Colossians 2.11, Philippians 3.3). Here in Romans 3 Paul speaks of man’s inability to conform to the Law of Moses and how God overcame that.

“19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. 20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin. 21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; 22 Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference: 23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; 24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: 25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; 26 To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.”

We cannot please God by striving to keep the Law of Moses and we inevitably fail in that endeavour. James 2.10 tells us “whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all”. Psalm 130.3 rhetorically asks “If thou, O Lord, shouldest mark iniquities, O Lord, who shall stand?” The obvious answer is that no man shall stand. No man has kept or ever can keep the whole Law of Moses, and those who try do so in vain. Not only does our sinful human nature prevent us from perfectly fulfilling the Mosaic Law, but there are many facets of the Law of Moses that we simply cannot understand fully today.

There are some laws in the Pentateuch for which there is no certain interpretation; for instance Leviticus 19.27 which reads “Ye shall not round the corners of your heads, neither shalt thou mar the corners of thy beard” (KJV) or “Ye shall not make a round cutting of the hair of your head, nor disfigure your beard” (Brenton’s LXX). There are varied interpretations as to what this passage means and men today can only offer conjecture. Another point of contention is Numbers 15.38 which concerns the fringes which were to be sewn onto garments. How are they to be constructed precisely? Are they to simply be fringes or are tassels to be added to the fringes? If you affix tassles, what length is appropriate? No man knows with certainty and a man can only guess and make a vain display of himself for his trouble.

The people of the Kingdom of Israel had all departed from the Holy Land at least 2,600 years ago, and even before that most of us were pagans already. We lost our oral traditions regarding the proper understanding of all the minutiae of the Law of Moses during our apostasy and captivity. The Kingdom of Judah fared little better leaving behind little of worth for this purpose. What data about the Mosaic Law can be gleaned from sources such as Josephus, Philo and the Dead Sea Scrolls sheds little light and may well reflect errant traditions. No man today can claim complete understanding of the Law of Moses.

In Jeremiah 31.33 in a prophecy of the New Covenant God tells us “I will surely put my laws into their mind, and write them on their hearts”. This is cited twice in Paul’s epistle to the Hebrews (8.10, 10.16). To those who believe and teach that we must take up the Law of Moses, I ask you this: what is written on your heart? Is it how to sew the right type of fringes onto your garments? Is it how to properly circumcise a child? Is it judicial prescriptions? Is it to avoid wearing garments woven of two materials? Or is it written in your heart that thou shalt do no murder, thou shalt not commit adultery, thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not bear false witness, honour thy father and thy mother and thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself?

“1 Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to you, to me indeed is not grievous, but for you it is safe.

2 Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision.

3 For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.”
-Philippians 3

“21 Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law?

22 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.

23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.

24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.

25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.

26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.

27 For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband.

28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.

29 But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.

30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.

31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.”
-Galatians 4

“11 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

13 For he of whom these things are spoken pertaineth to another tribe, of which no man gave attendance at the altar.

14 For it is evident that our Lord sprang out of Juda; of which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood.

15 And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest,

16 Who is made, not after the law of a carnal commandment, but after the power of an endless life.

17 For he testifieth, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.

18 For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof.

19 For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God.

20 And inasmuch as not without an oath he was made priest:

21 (For those priests were made without an oath; but this with an oath by him that said unto him, The Lord sware and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec:)

22 By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament.”
-Hebrews 7


Caucasian Ancient Mizraim

There is widespread confusion in the world today concerning the racial character of the ancient Egyptians. Largely this is due to the rise of Negrocentric revisionism in recent decades as African Americans desperately seek a cultural identity worthy of pride. There is much to be said of this topic, and interested readers might care to view the following articles.

‘Mizraim, Ludim, Anamim, Lehabim, Naphtuhim and Pathrusim’

‘Refuting “Black Hebrew Israelites”‘

This album hosts a collection of ancient Egyptian art which depicts the ancient Egyptians. Clearly the Egypt of Mizraim was of Caucasoid stock, generally of the Mediterranean variety. This is affirmed by genetic evidence which shows that the ancient Egyptians were most closely related to ancient Near Eastern populations.


It has been proven by archaeogenetics that the ancient Egyptians had less sub-Saharan admixture than even Egypt’s modern Caucasoid inhabitants which still have fairly little. Most of this admixture was introduced after the Islamic era though some undoubtedly occured in more ancient times.


A statue of Nofret, the mastaba of Prince Rahotep. 4th dynasty.
A mural of Nefertari (L) and Isis, the tomb of Nefertari. 19th dynasty.
A statue of Ranefer, Saqqara. 4th dynasty.
The coffin of Amenhotep I, Thebes. 18th dynasty.
The Sitting Scribe, Saqqara. 4th dynasty.
A statue of Sepa, Saqqara. 3rd dynasty.
The cartonnage mask of Shepenmut, Thebes. 25th dynasty.
An Egyptian reserve head, Giza. 4th dynasty.
A mural of Nefertiabet, Giza. 4th dynasty.
The coffin of Irthorru, Meir. 26th dynasty.
A statue of Wepwawetemhat, Asyut. 12th dynasty.
A statue of Nesa, Saqqara. 3rd dynasty.
A mural depicting musicians, the tomb of Rekhmire, Thebes. 18th dynasty.
A statue of Rahotep, the mastaba of Prince Rahotep. 4th dynasty.
The coffin of Tabakmut, Thebes. 21st dynasty.
A bust of Nefertiti, Amarna. 18th dynasty.
An Egyptian reserve head, Giza. 4th dynasty.
A detail from the coffin of Djehutynakht, Deir el-Bersha. 12th dynasty.
The coffin of Tenatcharoe, Saqqara. 22nd dynasty.
A statue of an Egyptian man, Asyut. 11th dynasty.
The coffin of an Egyptian noblewoman, Thebes. 18th dynasty.
A statue of Hemiunu, Giza. 4th dynasty.
A mural of an Egyptian woman, Deir el-Medina. 20th dynasty.
The Arrhenius coffin, Deir el-Bahri. 21st dynasty.
A statue of Keki, Giza. 6th dynasty.

It can be demonstrated that the Biblical Casluhim, Caphtorim and Philistines (descendants of Mizraim, the Egyptian patriarch) are one and the same people as the Minoans of Crete. Demonstrably these Philistines were Caucasoid Mediterranean stock very similar to their southerly Egyptian cousins.

‘Philistim and Caphtorim’

Genetic samples extracted from Philistine remains at Ashkelon have now proven that the Philistines indeed came to Canaan from Southern Europe.


Many modern Greeks have a high degree of genetic continuity with the ancient Cretans/Philistines.


The Prince of Lillies fresco, Knossos, Crete.
La Parisienne fresco, Knossos, Crete.
The cupbearers fresco, Knossos, Crete.
The ladies in blue fresco, Knossos, Crete.
The dancing woman fresco, Knossos, Crete.
The procession fresco, Knossos, Crete.
The saffron gatherers fresco, Akrotiri, Santorini.
The bull leaping fresco, Knossos, Crete.
The saffron goddess fresco, Akrotiri, Santorini.

Deuteronomy 23.7 and the Reuelite-Edomites

‘Meeting Between Esau and Jacob’ -Raffaellino Bottalla

There is a certain verse from the Pentateuch which I have been asked about on several occasions, and so I have decided to write a commentary of my own which I hope will clear up any confusion about this topic. Here I will depart from the views of two scholars who I respect very much and cite quite often: Clifton Emahiser and William Finck.

If you have not read their work then you certainly should start reading it. My purpose here is not to attack their teachings concerning this topic; rather it is merely to offer an alternative perspective which I hope my readers will consider. If you have not heard what Emahiser and Finck have to say about this passage then you may want to have a look at the following works.



Emahiser and Finck make the case that Deuteronomy 23.7 contains a scribal error confusing Arammiy (H761) and Edomiy (H130) due to the similarity of the dalet and resh in Hebrew. I however believe that our interpretations of Scripture ought to rely on the assumption of the inerrancy of the extant texts of our Scriptures and I do not believe any interpretation of Scripture ought to rely on a revision of the text.

The Hebrew, Greek and Latin text of Deuteronomy 23.7 all contain the specific word concerned (Ιδουμαίον and Idumeum in the Greek and Latin respectively). Furthermore the Edomites are refered to as brethren of the Israelites on several other occasions (Numbers 20.14, Deuteronomy 2.4, Amos 1.11, Obadiah 1.10) and so I will offer my interpretation based on the premise that Deuteronomy 23.7 rightly contains an instance of Edomiy. In Deuteronomy 23.7 we read that an Edomite is not to be abhorred:

“Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite, because he is thy brother; thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian, because thou wast a stranger in his land.”
-Deuteronomy 23.7

This passage confuses many since the prophets are replete with condemnations of Edom. Ostensibly God himself came to abhor these Edomites (Isaiah 34, Malachi 1.2-4, Romans 9.13, Obadiah, Ezekiel 35, 25.13-14, Joel 3.19 et al.). One Scripture even tells us it was a blessed thing for the Israelites to slay the children of the Edomites in the time of David (Psalm 137.9). If God himself despises the Edomites then why was Israel commanded not to abhor an Edomite in the time of Moses?

In the second part of Deuteronomy 23.7 we are also told “thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian” but in later times they are portrayed as an alien people which Israel is chastised for mingling with (Jeremiah 2.16-22, Ezekiel 16.23-26, Ezra 9.1 et al.). In Ezekiel 30.5 the Egyptians are listed among “all the mixed multitude” alongside Ethiopia and Libya. Isaiah 43.3 has Egypt along with Seba and Ethiopia as nations God has forfeit to preserve Israel, these nations having served as a buffer between the non-Adamic sub-Saharan tribes to their South and the Israelites to the North.

‘The Noahite Nations: the Hamites’

‘The Origins of the Non-Adamic Races’

It can be demonstrated that Edom suffered a similar fate, as Esau’s offspring all came to be mixed with the cursed nations. Even the first generation of Edomites consisted largely of Canaanite halfbreeds and Esau’s miscegenation was a source of great grief to his parents:

“34And Esau was forty years old; and he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beoch the Chettite, and Basemath, daughter of Helon the Chettite. 35And they were provoking to Isaac and Rebecca.”
-Genesis 26

Rebecca was so distraught by Esau’s choice of wives that she saw no worth in her life if Jacob were to marry racial aliens like his brother:

“46And Rebecca said to Isaac, I am weary of my life, because of the daughters of the sons of Chet; if Jacob shall take a wife of the daughters of this land, wherefore should I live?”
-Genesis 27

At the behest of his father Jacob went to the house of his uncle Laban (meaning “White”, Strong’s and Gesenius’ s.v.) to find his wives Rachel and Leah who would bear children of the promise.

“1And Isaac called Jacob, and blessed him, and charged him, saying: Take not a wife of the stock of Chanaan: 2But go, and take a journey to Mesopotamia of Syria, to the house of Bathuel, thy mother’s father, and take thee a wife thence of the daughters of Laban, thy uncle. 3And God almighty bless thee, and make thee to increase and multiply thee: that thou mayst be a multitude of people. 4And give the blessings of Abraham to thee, and to thy seed after thee: that thou mayst possess the land of thy sojournment, which he promised to thy grandfather. 5And when Isaac had sent him away, he took his journey and went to Mesopotamia of Syria, to Laban, the son of Bathuel, the Syrian, brother to Rebecca, his mother.”
-Genesis 28

Many claim that intermarriage between diverse peoples was only forbidden in the Bible on purely religious grounds. The example of Jacob’s imperative to marry a woman of his mother’s tribe refutes this. Laban’s family was actually pagan (Genesis 31.19-35) as their Hebrew forebears were before the time of Abraham (Joshua 24.2, 15). If Jacob’s parent’s only concern was for their son’s religious fidelity they would not have sent Jacob to take a pagan wife. If race was of no concern then Jacob may just as well have married Canaanites like his brother. Ostensibly their concern was for their racial posterity.

Esau had forfeit his birthright and scorned his heritage, but he hoped that he might find redemption in his parent’s eyes by taking a wife of the Ishmaelites (Genesis 28.6-9), a people descended from Abraham and his Egyptian concubine Hagar. In Genesis 28.9 Esau’s Ishmaelite wife is named as Mahalath, but in Genesis 36.3 she is named as Bashemath, the same name as Esau’s Hethite wife mentioned at Genesis 26.34.

Perhaps both women were originally named Bashemath and Esau changed his Ishmaelite wife’s name to Mahalath so as not to have two wives of the same name. Perhaps Esau simply had two Ishmaelite wives, one of whom happened to share a name with his Hethite wife. In any case, it is apparent that Esau had fully Adamic offspring by one of his wives.

I would posit that the Edomite lineage descended from Esau and Mahalath must be the source of the Edomite who is the object of Deuteronomy 23.7. By law a mongrel is excluded from the congregation of the Lord (Deuteronomy 23.2) and so an Edomite line from Esau by a Canaanite woman is precluded from being the object of Deuteronomy 23.7.

‘Fornication, Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation and Multiculturalism’

Now one might wonder why the Law would not be more specific in regards to which Edomite tribes were acceptable for intermarriage. I would point out however, that Egypt is mentioned in the very same verse, and Egypt was by this time a nation which was largely racially compromised, much like Edom. The Israelites must have been expected to scrutinize the lineage of any Edomite or Egyptian drawn to them to become a proselyte and potentially to exclude them according to Deuteronomy 23.2.

‘The Noahite Nations: the Hamites’

It is apparent elsewhere in the Pentateuch that the Israelites were expected to be able to distinguish alien races from the the other Adamic peoples. In Exodus chapter 12 we read “This is the law of the passover: no stranger [allogenes, Strong’s G241 meaning literally “of another race” i.e. a non-Adamite] shall eat of it.” (vs. 43) A little further on we read “if any proselyte shall come to you to keep the passover to the Lord, thou shalt circumcise every male of him … he shall be even as the original inhabitant of the land” (vs. 48).

These laws offer no further instruction as to how one can distinguish between the licit proselyte and the illicit alien. Ostensibly the Israelites were expected to scrutinize the racial purity of potential converts judging them by their works, countenance and/or genealogical records and this would naturally apply to Edomite and Egyptian proselytes who are mentioned at Deuteronomy 23.7.

Interestingly Yahweh was worshiped in ancient Edom and He is called “Yahweh of Teman” (Teman is an ancient Edomite city) in an inscription at Kuntillet Ajrud (Anthony Bonanno, Archaeology and fertility cult in the ancient Mediterranean, University of Malta p. 238 ff.).

In Genesis 36.3-13 we can trace the sons of Esau by Mahalath/Bashemath through Reuel (“friend of God”, Strong’s and Gesenius’ s.v. Reuwel) down to Zerah, mentioned as an early Edomite duke in vs. 17. Interestingly the line of Esau by his Ishmaelite wife through Zerah is mentioned again in one other place, only found in the ancient Septuagint. There his name is rendered into Greek as Ζαρέ, the same rendering used in Genesis 36:

“17And Job died, an old man and full of days: and it is written that he will rise again with those whom the Lord raises up. This man is described in the Syriac book as living in the land of Ausis [Uz], on the borders of Idumea and Arabia: and his name before was Jobab; and having taken an Arabian wife, he begot a son whose name was Ennon. And he himself was the son of his father Zare, one of the sons of Esau, and of his mother Bosorrha, so that he was the fifth from Abraam. …”
-Job 42 (LXX)

Ostensibly these prestigious Adamic Edomite lineages came to be mingled with the corrupted offspring of their father or other cursed tribes, just as the Egyptians mentioned alongside them in Deuteronomy 23.7 also had. God’s promises to tribes depend upon the legitimacy of their seed, and the corrupted seed of Esau surely forsook any favour they once found with God and Israel.

‘The Satanic Origins of the Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews’

White Ancient Aram

The Syrians were descendants of Aram, the brother of Arphaxad, the forebear of the Hebrews. The ancient Syrians left behind many funerary reliefs depicting themselves. These clearly display the Europoid features of the offspring of Aram, cousins of the ancient Israelites. The tomb of Rekhmire in Thebes (Theban Tomb TT100) contains murals depicting red haired Syrian tribute bearers. In the Anatolian city of Edessa some funerary mosaics have been discovered which depict pale and sometimes grey-eyed Aramaeans.

‘Physical Descriptions of the Adamites, Shemites, Hebrews, Israelites and Judahites’

The House of the Pharaohs and the Ancient Hebrews

Ossipumphnoferu. He was the general of Thutmose III who was probably the Exodus pharaoh.

Three passages in the Pentateuch indicate that the Israelites were physically similar to the Egyptian nobility that ruled when the Israelites dwelt there and could not be easily distinguished from them (Genesis 42.8, 50.1-11, Exodus 2.19). Considering the racially tumultuous history of Egypt, if we want to make use of these clues, it is necessary that we establish when the Israelites lived in Egypt and what race ruled Egypt at that time.

Yuya. He was the “Master of the Horse” for Amenhotep III, the grandson of Thutmose III.

Both the records of Flavius Josephus and an honest study of the chronology of the period attest to us that an 18th Dynasty pharaoh named Thutmose (called Tethmosis by Josephus, Against Apion 1.91-94, most probably Thutmose III) was the pharaoh of the Exodus. Another four pharaohs bearing this name were all related. Hatshepsut was the fifth of the Thutmosid Dynasty, and it is probably she who became Moses’ adoptive Egyptian mother, perhaps giving him a form of her family name. The sixth and eighth pharaohs of the dynasty were Thutmose III and IV. Amenhotep III then reigned until Akhenaten took the throne.

Hatshepsut. She was probably Moses’ adoptive mother.

Josephus regarded the Hyksos of Manetheo’s Aegyptica as being the same people as the Israelites (Against Apion 1.91-92, 103-104). While this is only partially correct, Manetheo evidently confusing or conflating the Hebrews and related Asiatic Shemites as the Hyksos in his account, this does help to establish the correct dating of the Egyptian captivity and Exodus to the early-mid 2nd millennium BC. This is the period during which the Hyksos are known to have dwelt in Egypt.

Ramesses II. He was not an 18th dynasty pharaoh, but early 19th. He exhibits the same racial characteristics as his 18th dynasty predecessors. Some scholars (wrongly) date the exodus to the Ramesside period.

It was during the reign of Akhenaten that the Amarna Letters were written. As I have demonstrated in this essay, the Amarna letters document the Hebrew conquest of Canaan. While his Canaanite subjects begged Akhenaten to send soldiers to halt the Hebrew’s conquest, Akhenaten would not hear their pleas, probably because the Exodus was fresh in his people’s memory.

‘The Noahite Nations: the Shemites’ https://teknatoutheou.home.blog/2020/01/30/the-noahite-nations-the-shemites/

Tjuyu. She was the wife of Yuya.

Here I have gathered some images of 18th dynasty mummies such as Yuya, Tjuyu, Thutmose IV and Ossipumphnoferu as well as the 19th dynasty pharaoh Ramesses II and they are unquestionably Caucasoid with Nordid features and fair blonde, red or sandy brown hair. If Israelites such as Moses and Joseph were blending in among their contemporary Egyptian nobility then they must have had similar phenotypes.

Amenhotep II. He was the son of Thutmose III.

This stock had ostensibly been present to some degree since pre-dynastic times. The Gebelein pre-dynastic mummies all had Nordoid or Nordo-Mediterranean cranial and facial features. All had sandy brown hair, with the exception of their leader, dubbed “Ginger”, who had strawberry blonde hair. Given their very early dating, these were probably among the first Noahite settlers in Egypt.

The young male Gebelein sand mummy nicknamed “Ginger”.

Of course these Nordoid Egyptians are probably not the original stock of Mizraim. The Hamitic stock of Egypt was certainly generally of the Mediterranean variety which is clear from the art of ancient Egypt, the mummified remains of the Egyptians and the racial types which dominate there today, altered somewhat as they are.

‘Caucasian Ancient Mizraim’ https://teknatoutheou.home.blog/2020/05/13/white-ancient-egypt/

Tiye. She was the wife of Amenhotep III.

These Nordoid Egyptians probably grew in prevalence with the influx of Asiatic Shemites in the Middle Bronze Age, most probably connected to the migrations of Asiatic chariot warriors such as the Hyksos from the Levant. I have expounded upon this thesis in the following essay near the end of the entry for Arphaxad and sons.

‘The Noahite Nations: the Shemites’

‘Physical Descriptions of the Adamites, Shemites, Hebrews, Israelites and Judahites’

Thutmose IV. He was the grandson of Thutmose III.

Though the North African Hamitic stock of Egypt would eventually fully reassert itself, casting the Asiatic Shemitic stock of Egypt into obscurity, this fairer stock would persist in small numbers even up until the 7th century BC and the illegal occupation of Egypt by the mongrel Nubians. Even today, occasional throwbacks to Nordoid traits such as hyperdepigmentation, narrow upright noses and tall stature can be observed among some of the inhabitants of Egypt.


Takabuti, a 25th dynasty Egyptian noblewoman contemporary to the Nubian occupation of Egypt.

At the site of Tell el-Daba (the later Hyksos capital of Avaris) in the land of Goshen in Egypt, there has been a remarkable discovery: the tomb of an Asiatic nobleman containing the remains of a statue, dating to the end of the 12th dynasty. The paint remaining on the statue shows that the owner was a red-haired man who wore a coat of many colours. He held a throw-stick on his shoulder which marks him as a man of authority. His red hair was cut in the “mushroom” style commonly worn by Northern Asiatics like the Syrians (e.g. many of the Syrian tribute bearers painted in TT100, the tomb of Rekhmire). On top of the remains of a modest “mittlesaalhaus” in Syrian style, we find a lavish house of Egyptian construction with 12 pillars in the portico. On the property outside the house are 12 tombs, including the lavish tomb containing the statue.

The connections to the tribes of Israel and Joseph are striking: the location in the later Hyksos capital in Goshen (Genesis 45.10, 47.1-27, 50.8, Exodus 8.22 et al.), the Syrian characteristics of the statue and the original “mittlesaalhaus” construction on the property (Genesis 24.1-10, 25.20, 28.1-5, Deuteronomy 26.5 et al.), the red hair (Genesis 25.25, 1 Samuel 16.12, 17.42, Strong’s and Gesenius s.v. admoniy, Liddell-Scott s.v. purrakes), the coat of many colours (Genesis 37.3-32), the 12 tombs and pillars (Genesis 49.28, Exodus 39.14 et al.), and the fact that the remains of the nobleman were exhumed from the tomb (Genesis 50.25, Exodus 13.19 et al.). If this is not the house and tomb of Joseph son of Israel, then at the very least this gives us an interesting glimpse into the place and time in which the Israelites dwelt in Egypt.

‘Physical Descriptions of the Adamites, Shemites, Hebrews, Israelites and Judahites’

‘White Ancient Aram’ 

The Dispersions of Israel: the Danaans and Dorians

The Lion Hunt Mosaic, Pella, Greece.

It has often been taken for granted that the Hellenic peoples of the Aegean, without any substantial exception, descended from the Japhethic patriarch Javan (Genesis 10.2). Indeed, Javan seems to have sired many of the early Greeks, particularly the Ionians, but there remain many unanswered questions about Greek ethnogenesis as it relates to Biblical history. A long time has elapsed since the period in which Genesis 10 is set and the solidification of Classical or even Archaic Greek culture, and undoubtedly many migrations have occured in that time.

When we study the names of the sons of Javan in Genesis 10 and the records of their descendants in history it is evident that they are all associated with the Ionian Greeks and certain islands and coasts about the Mediterranean basin such as Rhodes, Cyprus and Tarshish. There is no evidence of any connection to other prominent Greek groups such as the Danaans/Achaeans or Dorians, nor to other early Aegean peoples such as the Minoans and Pelasgians.

‘The Noahite Nations: the Japhethites’

There are hints in the Scriptures that the Philistines are to be associated with Crete, but it was not until more recent advances in archaeology and genetics that it became certain that the pre-Hellenic Minoan civilization of the Aegean was that of the Biblical Casluhim, Caphtorim and Philistines. These discoveries go to show that the mysteries of Greek ethnogenesis in relation to the Biblical narrative are still unraveling in the modern day.

‘The Noahite Nations: the Hamites’

The Danaans, by all Classical accounts, had come to Greece from Egypt with the eponymous patriarch Danaus. Here we shall examine two accounts recorded by Diodorus Siculus in his Library of History. First let’s look at the account which Diodorus relates to us from Hecataeus of Abdera, a Greek historian of the 4th century BC:

“… the aliens were driven from the country, and the most outstanding and active among them banded together and, as some say, were cast ashore in Greece and certain other regions; their leaders were notable men, chief among them being Danaus and Cadmus. But the greater number were driven into what is now called Judea  The colony was headed by a man called Moses, outstanding both for his wisdom and for his courage.”
-Diodorus Siculus, Library of History 40.3.2

It is evident here that Hecataeus is relating a version of the Exodus from an Egyptian perspective. Undoubtedly political and ethnic biases taint this account of the Exodus, Hecataeus reporting of what he learned in Egypt. Nonetheless, he was clearly aware of the events that took place around the time that the Hebrews departed from Egypt and he, a Greek, associated the eminent Greek patriarchs Danaus and Cadmus with the Hebrews who fled Egypt under Moses. Diodorus also mentions Danaus again in connection with the Israelite migration out of Egypt:

They say also that those who set forth with Danaus, likewise from Egypt, settled what is practically the oldest city of Greece, Argos, and that the nation of the Colchi in Pontus and that of the Judeans, which lies between Arabia and Syria, were founded as colonies by certain emigrants from their country 3. And this is the reason why it is a long-established institution among these two peoples to circumcise their male children, the custom having been brought over from Egypt.”
-Diodorus Siculus, Library of History 1.28.1

This event was parodied in later Classical Greek writings as the retreat of the “daughters of Danaus” from the “sons of Aegyptus”. One such example is the play Suppliant Maidens by Aeschylus. Cadmus is called “the Phoenician” throughout Classical Greek literature and was regarded as the founder of Thebes (John B. Alden, The Greek Anthology pp. 160-162). Cadmus is said to have been the grandfather of Dionysus (Diodorus Siculus, Library of History 4.2.1, 4.2.2-3 et al.), and to have come from the city of Thebes in Egypt (ibid. 1.23.4).

There is no scholarly consensus as to the etymology of the name Cadmus, but the most likely explanation is that is comes from the Semitic triliteral root *qadm- meaning “East”, with the addition of the Greek masculine name ending -os giving the meaning “man of the East”. This certainly is suitable to a figure who came to Greece from the East from either Egypt or Canaan. Herodotus credits the Phoenician colonists who came with Cadmus with introducing the art of writing to the Ionians who had preceded them into Greece:

The Phoenicians who came with Cadmus  introduced into Greece, after their settlement in the country, a number of accomplishments, of which the most important was writing, an art till then, I think, unknown to the Greeks. At first they used the same characters as all the other Phoenicians, but as time went on, and they changed their language, they also changed the shape of their letters. At that period most of the Greeks in the neighborhood were Ionians; they were taught these letters by the Phoenicians and adopted them, with a few alterations, for their own use, continuing to refer to them as the Phoenician characters—as was only right, as the Phoenicians had introduced them.”
-Herodotus, The Histories 5.58

Diodorus Siculus likewise attributes the origins of the Greek alphabet to Cadmus the Phoenician, though his account attributes their initial adoption to the Pelasgians rather than the Ionians.

“… when Cadmus brought from Phoenicia the letters, as they are called, Linus was again the first to transfer them into the Greek language, to give a name to each character, and to fix its shape. Now the letters, as a group, are called “Phoenician” because they were brought to the Greeks from the Phoenicians, but as single letters the Pelasgians were the first to make use of the transferred characters and so they were called “Pelasgic.””
-Diodorus Siculus, Library of History 3.67.1

It can be demonstrated that the Phoenicians of the maritime golden age of Phoenicia were not all Canaanites by race as commonly supposed, but that Phoenicia was at that time ruled and populated mainly by Israelites. Indeed, no Canaanites departed from Egypt with Moses, Danaus or Cadmus, but Israelites certainly had. The seafaring habits of the tribe of Dan are certainly in line with those of the Phoenicians (Judges 5.17) and Scripture tells us that the tribe of Dan was sailing the Mediterranean alongside the Ionian Greeks (Ezekiel 27.19) so we should not be at all surprised to see Phoenician colonists with Cadmus introducing these Ionians to the art of letters.


That the Greek alphabet derives from the Phoenician is now known to be a matter of fact (Roger D. Woodward, A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, Wiley-Blackwell), hardly a surprise considering that the names of the letters have, for the most part, scarcely changed from their original Hebrew names, e.g. alpha=aleph, beta=beth, gamma=gimel etc. The Phoenician script itself is known to have derived from the Proto-Sinaitic or “Proto-Canaanite” alphabet which derives from Egyptian hieroglyphs (Elizabeth J. Himelfarb, First Alphabet Found in Egypt, Archaeology 53, Issue 1: 21).


It can be demonstrated through an analysis of ancient Egyptian correspondence with their Canaanite chieftain subjects that the Israelites did indeed depart Egypt and conquer Canaan as described in the books of Exodus and Joshua. It must be these Hebrews departing Egypt who introduced the Proto-Sinaitic and Phoenician alphabets to Greece, Canaan and nearby regions supplanting the cuneiform scripts originally used by the Canaanites.

‘The Noahite Nations: the Shemites’ 

During the Greek Dark Ages and the Archaic Greek period there were complex linguistic relationships established between Northwest Semitic and Hellenic languages and the former had a very profound influence on the latter (Cyril Aslanov, Northwest Semitic Structural Influences on Archaic Greek: a Reassessment, academia.edu). Certainly these must have formed as the Israelites settled in the developing Hellenic world.

So-called Mycenaean artifacts and burials have been unearthed in Palestine, though the Jewish archaeologists privileged to study them rarely admit the connection to the Hellenic ties of the Danites. One such site is at Tel Dan (Dan II; A Chronicle of the Excavations and the Late Bronze Age “Mycenaean” Tomb, academia.edu). Another notable site host to so-called Mycenaean artifacts is Tel Dor (Biblical Archaeology Review, July-August 2001 p. 17 and November-December, 2002, Gorgon Excavated at Dor p. 50) a city of Manasseh. In light of the clear connections between ancient Israel and Greece, we ought to further consider the possibility of a relationship between Tel Dor and the Dorians of Greece.

The earliest mention of the Dorians is found in Homer’s Odyssey book 19 where we read in a description of Crete: “The Dorians, plumed amid the files of war, Her foodful glebe with fierce Achaians share”. Ostensibly Crete was a perfect staging area for an invasion by sea, and the Dorians seized upon this to conquer much of the Aegean, forcing the Danaans and others inland. That the Dorians had emigrated to Crete from Palestine is indicated in several ancient sources. As we saw in Diodorus Siculus’ Library of History, the Hebrews leaving Egypt with Danaus were said to have settled Argos; not a city of the Danaans, but of the Dorians. Here the ancient Judaean historian Flavius Josephus records a letter written by a Lacedemonian (Spartan) king to the high preist at Jerusalem:

Areus, King of the Lacedemonians, To Onias, Sendeth Greeting. We have met with a certain writing, whereby we have discovered, that both the Judeans and the Lacedemonians are of one stock; and are derived from the kindred of Abraham: It is but just therefore, that you, who are our brethren, should send to us about any of your concerns as you please.”
-Josephus, Antiquities of the Judaeans 12.4.10

The reply to this letter was long delayed due to the Maccabean wars and other problems amongst the Judaeans, but it is recorded in Josephus’ Antiquities 13.5.8 as well as in the deuterocanonical book 1 Maccabees in the twelfth chapter:

“Jonathan the high priest, and the elders of the nation, and the priests, and the other people of the Judaeans, unto the Lacedemonians their brethren send greeting: There were letters sent in times past unto Onias the high priest from Darius, who reigned then among you, to signify that ye are our brethren, as the copy here underwritten doth specify. … we also, albeit we need none of these things, for that we have the holy books of scripture in our hands to comfort us, have nevertheless attempted to send unto you for the renewing of brotherhood and friendship … We commanded them also to go unto you, and to salute you, and to deliver you our letters concerning the renewing of our brotherhood. … And this is the copy of the letters which Oniares sent. Areus king of the Lacedemonians to Onias the high priest, greeting: It is found in writing, that the Lacedemonians and Judaeans are brethren, and that they are of the stock of Abraham …”
-1 Maccabees 12.6-21

Egyptian records tell of a confederacy of tribes that attacked Egypt and other points in the Eastern Mediterranean during the Late Bronze Age Collapse. Among the names of these peoples are two which are connected with Greece: Denyen and Ekwesh. The Denyen have variously been identified as the Danaans (Jorrit M. Kelder, The Egyptian Interest in Mycenaean Greece, Jaarbericht Ex Oriente Lux p. 126), the Israelite tribe of Dan (ibid.) and the Dorian Greeks (Eckhard Siemer, Der Friedensvertrag von 1258 v. Chr. und die Ehe der Naptera, Der hethitisch- mykenische Zinnhandel in Europa und der Untergang ihrer Reiche (1430 – 1130 BC) sowie, Vincent von Beauvais De plumbo p. 228). Whether or not the Denyen of Egyptian records are Danaans or Dorians, they were surely Israelites.

The identification of the Denyen as Israelites is supported by the fact that Egyptian records mention them alongside the Peleset (the Biblical Philistines) indicating their proximity (Edward Hincks, An Attempt to Ascertain the Number, Names, and Powers, of the Letters of the Hieroglyphic, or Ancient Egyptian Alphabet; Grounded on the Establishment of a New Principle in the Use of Phonetic Characters, The Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy 21 (21): 176, William Osburn, Ancient Egypt, Her Testimony to the Truth of the Bible, Samuel Bagster and Sons p. 107).

The Ekwesh have been identified with the Achaeans/Danaans (Robert Drews, The End of the Bronze Age: Changes in Warfare and the Catastrophe of ca. 1200 B.C., Princeton University Press pp. 49, 54, Jorrit M. Kelder, The Egyptian Interest in Mycenaean Greece, Jaarbericht Ex Oriente Lux p. 126). Interestingly we find on the Great Karnak Inscription that the Ekwesh were circumcised (Manuel Robbins, Collapse of the Bronze Age: the story of Greece, Troy, Israel, Egypt, and the peoples of the sea, Authors Choice Press p. 158).

This ought to be compared to the report by Diodorus Siculus that circumcision was brought to Judaea by the Israelites “who set forth with Danaus” from Egypt (Library of History 1.28.1). There Diodorus only states that the Colchians and Judaeans practiced circumcision, this practice evidently having fallen out of favour among the Achaeans by his time, but apparently it had been known to them in the Late Bronze Age.

The ancient Judaeans were very similar in appearance to their contemporary Greeks as we should expect of kindred peoples. A famous ancient mosaic from the Huqoq synagogue in Palestine depicts Judaeans right alongside Greeks and they are both portrayed just the same with fair skin, straight noses and light hair.


‘Physical Descriptions of the Adamites, Shemites, Hebrews, Israelites and Judahites’

Alexander the Great or Antiochus VII (R) meets with the Judean high preist (Jaddus or John Hyrcanus I) and his companions (L), from the synagogue at Huqoq, Galilee, Palestine.

Flavius Josephus informs us that the Greeks and Judaeans were physically indistinguishable but for the circumcision of the Judaeans:

“Wherefore they desired his permission to build them a Gymnasium at Jerusalem. And when he had given them leave, they also hid the circumcision of their genitals, that even when they were naked they might appear to be Greeks.”
-Flavius Josephus, Antiquities 12.241

It ought to be noted here that the ancient Israelite practice of circumcision differed greatly from the later Jewish custom widely practiced in the Jewish, Islamic and American worlds today. Originally the practice only involved removal of any extra foreskin protruding beyond the glans which allowed for the restoration of the remaining foreskin. This is how the Judaeans “hid the circumcision of their genitals” when naked as Josephus describes (R. G. Hall, Epispasm: circumcision in reverse, Bible Review: 52-7).

Later on around 140 AD the Jews added another stage where the foreskin was cut further back, to the ridge behind the glans. The inner mucosal tissue was removed by use of a sharp finger nail or tool, including the excision and removal of the frenulum. Later during the Talmudic period (500-625 AD) a third step began to be practiced in which the Jew circumcising the child would suck the blood from the circumcision wound with his mouth; something expressly forbidden by God’s laws (Leviticus 17.10, 14, Acts 15.20, 29, James E. Peron, Circumcision: Then and Now, Many Blessings vol. 3 pp. 41-42).

‘The Satanic Origins of the Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews’

Samson the Danite is famous for his long locks of hair (Judges 16.13, 19) of which he had seven. Strong’s defines Samson’s locks (machalapha, H4253) as “a ringlet of hair (as gliding over each other) — lock.” Brown-Driver-Briggs defines it as “braid, lock, plait”. Samson most probably wore his hair in seven braids, plaits or locks.

Such locks were popular among the Greeks in ancient times (Rick Steves, Athens and the Peloponnese, Avalon Travel p. 165, Ian Jenkins, Archaic Kouroi in Naucratis: The Case for Cypriot Origin, American Journal of Archaeology vol. 105 pp. 168–175, Richard Hook, The Spartan Army, Osprey Publishing p. 24).

A similar hairstyle is also seen in the famous Akrotiri Boxer Frescoe of Santorini Greece where it is worn by Minoan youths. The Minoans of course were one and the same stock as the Biblical Philistines; neighbours of the Danites and a people the Israelites extensively interacted with. Samson the Danite had a Philistine wife (Judges 14).

‘The Noahite Nations: the Hamites’

Though they had adopted many of the customs of the Japhetic Ionians and Hamitic Minoans as well as the pagan religions of these tribes, the Israelites who settled in the Aegean surely maintained many of their Hebrew customs and beliefs. As we have seen, the Ekwesh/Achaeans were still practicing circumcision in the Late Bronze Age, and even in the time of Strabo (63 BC-23 AD) some Greeks (such as those in the temple-city of Comana in Pontus) considered swine to be unclean (Strabo, Geography 12.8.9). Many examples of Hebraisms have been found in Classical Greek literature, and certainly this is no mere coincidence.



That the Dorian Greeks were Israelites was certainly known to St. Paul. Here he tells the Dorian Greeks of Corinth that their fathers had all passed through the Red Sea with Moses in the Exodus. St. Paul was not speaking in an unexplained allegory here; rather he was telling his audience at Corinth that they descended from the Israelites of the Exodus:

“1 Now I do not wish you to be ignorant, brethren, that our fathers were all under the cloud, and all had passed through the sea. 2 And all up to Moses had immersed themselves in the cloud and in the sea, 3 and all had eaten the same spiritual food, 4 and all drank the same spiritual drink; for they drank of an attending spiritual rock, and that rock was Christ.”
-1 Corinthians 10

St. Paul again indicates that the Corinthians are flesh and blood descendants of Israel where he warns them of the evils of idolatry:

“18 Behold Israel after the flesh: are not they which eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar? 19 What say I then? that the idol is any thing, or that which is offered in sacrifice to idols is any thing? 20 But I say, that the things which the nations sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils. 21 Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord’s table, and of the table of devils.”
-1 Corinthians 10

These are two particularly obvious references to the Israelite heritage of the Greek peoples the Apostles ministered to, but there are many more to be found when due consideration is given regarding the Biblical and historical context of the epistles of Paul. Certainly St. Paul was ministering first and foremost to flesh and blood Israelites in accordance with the promises of the prophets and the mandates of Christ.


‘The New Covenant with Israel’