Featured

Fornication, Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation and Multiculturalism

‘Idolatry of King Solomon’ -Frans Francken II

It is clear from many factors that the story of Scripture is about one single race and its struggles against both moral and racial corruption at the hands of evil. Here I will not discuss the origination of this struggle at any length as I have undertaken that endeavour elsewhere.

‘The Origins of the Non-Adamic Races’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/02/02/the-origins-of-the-non-adamic-races/

‘Adam: The Patriarch of One Race’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/adam-the-patriarch-of-one-race/

‘The Origins of the Serpent Seed’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-origins-of-the-serpent-seed/

My purpose here will be to point out and explain some of the instances in Scripture where we recieve instruction and information regarding our obligation to our Father to remain separate from the other races so that we may remain in his image.

It is obvious from many passages of Scripture that the ideal is to marry someone of one’s own race and ethnic kindred. This is exemplified by the fathers as seen in Genesis 24 where we read that Abraham desires for Isaac to marry a woman of his own tribe.

“1And Abraam was old, advanced in days, and the Lord blessed Abraam in all things. 2And Abraam said to his servant the elder of his house, who had rule over all his possessions, Put thy hand under my thigh, 3and I will adjure thee by the Lord the God of heaven, and the God of the earth, that thou take not a wife for my son Isaac from the daughters of the Chananites, with whom I dwell, in the midst of them. 4But thou shalt go instead to my country, where I was born, and to my tribe, and thou shalt take from thence a wife for my son Isaac.”
-Genesis 24

Isaac’s son Esau would not follow in his father’s footsteps but rather would forsake his heritage and take wives of the mongrelized Canaanite tribes.

“34And Esau was forty years old; and he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beoch the Chettite, and Basemath, daughter of Helon the Chettite. 35And they were provoking to Isaac and Rebecca.”
-Genesis 26

Rebecca was so saddened at Esau’s fornication that she saw no worth in living if Jacob too would marry racial aliens like Esau did.

“46And Rebecca said to Isaac, I am weary of my life, because of the daughters of the sons of Chet; if Jacob shall take a wife of the daughters of this land, wherefore should I live?”
-Genesis 27

At Isaac’s behest Jacob went to his uncle Laban (meaning “White”) in Mesopotamia to find his kindred wives Rachel and Leah who would bear children of the promise.

“1And Isaac having called for Jacob, blessed him, and charged him, saying, Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of the Chananites. 2Rise and depart quickly into Mesopotamia, to the house of Bathuel the father of thy mother, and take to thyself thence a wife of the daughters of Laban thy mother’s brother. 3And may my God bless thee, and increase thee, and multiply thee, and thou shalt become gatherings of nations.”
-Genesis 28

The example of Jacob’s imperative to marry a woman of his mother’s tribe refutes the common argument that miscegenation was only forbidden on religious grounds. The truth is that Laban’s family was pagan (Genesis 31.19-35) as their Hebrew forebears were before the time of Abraham (Joshua 24.2, 15). If Jacob’s parents were only concerned about their son’s religious integrity they would not have sent him to take a pagan wife. If race was of no concern he may as well have married a Canaanite like his brother. It is thus evident that their concern was for their racial posterity.

Jacob’s son Judah was a fornicator and he erred by taking a Canaanite wife. Two of his halfbreed children were stricken down by God but one of his bastard offspring named Shelah lived. Despite Shelah being Judah’s first born living son he was not considered a valid heir. Rather Pharez was firstborn preceding his twin Zarah from the womb. Shelah was not even a potential heir for he was born of fornication while Pharez and Zarah were born of Tamar, a pedigreed Semite.

The Levitical priesthood was held to a very high standard concerning ethnic homogeneity. While other Israelites were permitted on occasion to marry between Israelite tribes and even sometimes to take wives of Adamic nations apart from Israel, the Levites were commanded to marry Levite women.

“13He shall take for a wife a virgin of his own tribe. 14But a widow, or one that is put away, or profaned, or a harlot, these he shall not take; but he shall take for a wife a virgin of his own people. 15And he shall not profane his seed among his people: I am the Lord that sanctifies him.”
-Leviticus 21

The ideal of homogeneity is also encoded in other Levitical laws concerning the day to day lives of the Israelites. These serve as reminders of Israel’s duty to remain pure and set apart from the other nations.

“19 Keep ye my laws. Thou shalt not make thy cattle to gender with beasts of any other kind. Thou shalt not sow thy field with different seeds. Thou shalt not wear a garment that is woven of two sorts.”
-Leviticus 19

The following passage from the deuterocanonical book the Wisdom of Sirach sheds light on a deeper meaning of this Levitical law regarding the sowing of seed. It is not just a rule for agricultural practice.

“19 My son, keep the flower of thine age sound; and give not thy strength to strangers. 20 When thou hast gotten a fruitful possession through all the field, sow it with thine own seed, trusting in the goodness of thy stock. 21 So thy race which thou leavest shall be magnified, having the confidence of their good descent.”
-Sirach 26

The importance of racial purity is emphasized in other deuterocanonical or apocryphal sources. While these sources are not primary canonical Scriptures they surely do indicate to us that ancient Judaeans and early Christians understood the importance of racial purity and separatism. 

In the apocryphal book of 4 Maccabees the ideal wife is exemplified as a virgin Israelite untainted by miscegenation who cares for her Adamic posterity. 

“7 And the righteous mother of the seven children spake also as follows to her offspring: I was a pure virgin, and went not beyond my father’s house; but I took care of the built-up rib [Adam’s rib]. 8 No destroyer of the desert, or ravisher of the plain, injured me; nor did the destructive, deceitful snake, make spoil of my chaste virginity; and I remained with my husband during the period of my prime.”
-4 Maccabees 18

In Tobit chapter 4 Tobit advises his son to marry a wife of his own tribe and to stay away from whores and foreigners. Of course the typical whore in Judaea in their time would be a Canaanite, perhaps a temple prostitute of a pagan god. 

“12 Beware of all whoredom, my son, and chiefly take a wife of the seed of thy fathers, and take not a strange woman to wife, which is not of thy father’s tribe: for we are the children of the prophets, Noe, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob: remember, my son, that our fathers from the beginning, even that they all married wives of their own kindred, and were blessed in their children, and their seed shall inherit the land. 13 Now therefore, my son, love thy brethren, and despise not in thy heart thy brethren, the sons and daughters of thy people, in not taking a wife of them: for in pride is destruction and much trouble, and in lewdness is decay and great want: for lewdness is the mother of famine.”
-Tobit 4

In the Second Temple there was a common Greek Inscription known as the Warning Inscription which condemns racial aliens who trespass in the Temple to death. 

“No stranger (allogene, Strong’s G241 meaning literally “of another race”) is to enter within the balustrade round the temple and enclosure. Whoever is caught will be himself responsible for his ensuing death.” 

At Deuteronomy 23.2 we read that a mamzer (“bastard” in the King James, Strong’s H4464) is excluded from the congregation.

“2 A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord.”
-Deuteronomy 23

Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance defines mamzer thusly:

“bastard
From an unused root meaning to alienate; a mongrel, i.e. Born of a Jewish [sic. Israelite] father and a heathen mother — bastard.”

The first component of mamzer is the root mam meaning “to stain” which according to Gesenius is the root of the noun muwm (H3971) meaning “blemish” or “spot”. While Strong’s does not offer an entry for the root mam Gesenius does on page 445 where he offers the meaning “to stain” or “to disfigure”.

In Gesenius’ Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon at the end of the entry for mamzer we read that some scholars take mamzer from zuwr (H2114) meaning to “turn aside”, “be a stranger”, “go away” or “come from another place” and Strong’s tells us the root of mamzer means “to alienate”. Thus the full literal meaning of mamzer must be “strange/foreign/alien blemish/stain/spot”.

The only other Biblical occurrance of mamzer is at Zechariah 9.6 where we see the prophecy of God’s wrath on various Adamic nations. In the Greek text of Zechariah 9.6 in the Septuagint mamzer is translated allogeneis (G241) which means literally “of another race”. Zechariah of course refers to a mongrel race that would make an end of the Philistines of Ashdod. Quoting from the New American Standard Bible which renders mamzer accurately:

“6 And a mongrel race will dwell in Ashdod, And I will cut off the pride of the Philistines.”
-Zechariah 9

Likewise elsewhere in Scripture we see that entire Adamic nations had been given over to mongrelization in Old Testament times starting with the Hamitic tribes of Northern Africa, the Horn of Africa and Southern Arabia.

“For I am the Lord thy God, the Holy One of Israel, thy Saviour: I gave Egypt for thy ransom, Ethiopia and Seba for thee.”
-Isaiah 43.3

It seems God placed these Hamites between Israel and the non-Adamic Nilotic Congoid tribes who had begun to soil the Adamic blood of Northern Africa, the Horn of Africa and Southern Arabia. Note that Ethiopia and Egypt exist as nations (in the deracinated modern sense), but that God no longer counts them among the nations because they are all demonic hybrids today.

‘Concerning the Ancient Aethiops’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/28/concerning-the-ancient-aethiops/

God promised He would make a full end of the nations among whom the Israelites were dispersed. Foremost among these were Assyria, Babylon, and Persia which are all home to mongrel races today as are Egypt, Seba, Ethiopia, Ashdod and the whole land of old Philistia.

“28Fear not thou, my servant Jacob, saith the Lord; for I am with thee: she that was without fear and in luxury, has been delivered up: for I will make a full end of every nation among whom I have thrust thee forth; but I will not cause thee to fail: yet will I chastise thee in the way of judgment, and will not hold thee entirely guiltless.”
-Jeremiah 46

Israel was the only nation in the whole Adamic world to whom God had explicitly promised preservation until the last days. Thus we have much in Scripture to teach us the importance of racial posterity. Of course it has been a struggle for us and so we have also recieved many admonitions for fornicating with the mongrelized nations.

Here the prophet Jeremiah speaks of the whoredom of Israel representing the racial nation of Israel as vine. Plant life used to symbolize people, families, nations and races is a very common idiom in Scripture. Notice that the result of their fornication is a stain that cannot be washed away which well describes the darkening inflicted upon mongrel offspring.

“20For of old thou hast broken thy yoke, and plucked asunder thy bands; and thou has said, I will not serve thee, but will go upon every high hill, and under every shady tree, there will I indulge in my fornication.

21Yet I planted thee a fruitful vine, entirely of the right sort: how art thou a strange vine turned to bitterness!

22Though thou shouldest wash thyself with nitre, and multiply to thyself soap, still thou art stained by thine iniquities before me, saith the Lord.”
-Jeremiah 2

We see in the previous passage in Jeremiah that miscegenation is connected with idolatry which was practiced on the high places and in groves. In ancient Canaan the pagan cults to gods such as Astarte and Baal were inextricably linked to fertility rites and temple prostitution. Thus to worship these idols was to be joined to the mongrel Canaanites in fornication.

https://christogenea.org/essays/broken-cisterns

Here in Ezekiel we see the act of idolatry itself described as an act of fornication with strangers. The house of fornication mentioned here is undoubtedly a pagan temple in which sexual rites were performed with racial aliens.

“23And it came to pass after all thy wickedness, saith the Lord, 24that thou didst build thyself a house of fornication, and didst make thyself a public place in every street; 25and on the head of every way thou didst set up thy fornications, and didst defile thy beauty, and didst open thy feet to every passer by, and didst multiply thy fornication.”
-Ezekiel 16

The prophet Isaiah too describes idolatry as an act of adultery with other nations beyond Israel’s borders. Israel is symbolized here as a harlot who makes her bed in the high places of pagan worship.

“3But draw ye near hither, ye lawless children, the seed of adulterers and the harlot.

4Wherein have ye been rioting? and against whom have ye opened your mouth, and against whom have ye loosed your tongue? are ye not children of perdition? a lawless seed?

5who call upon idols under the leafy trees, slaying your children in the valleys among the rocks?

6That is thy portion, this is thy lot: and to them hast thou poured forth drink-offerings, and to these hast thou offered meat-offerings. Shall I not therefore be angry for these things?

7On a lofty and high mountain, there is thy bed, and thither thou carriedst up thy meat-offerings:

8and behind the posts of thy door thou didst place thy memorials. Didst thou think that if thou shouldest depart from me, thou wouldest gain? thou hast loved those that lay with thee;

9and thou hast multiplied thy whoredom with them, and thou hast increased the number of them that are far from thee, and hast sent ambassadors beyond thy borders, and hast been debased even to hell.”
-Isaiah 57

In chapter 4 of Hosea Israel is rebuked for idolatry and fornication. Among other sins we see that they “mingle blood with blood” and have “chosen the Chananites”. This clearly refers to the miscegenation of the Israelites with the Canaanites as they shared in the heathen fertility rites with “polluted ones”.

“1Hear the word of the Lord, ye children of Israel: for the Lord has a controversy with the inhabitants of the land, because there is no truth, nor mercy, nor knowledge of God in the land.

2Cursing, and lying, and murder, and theft, and adultery abound in the land, and they mingle blood with blood.

3Therefore shall the land mourn, and shall be diminished with all that dwell in it, with the wild beasts of the field, and the reptiles of the earth, and with the birds of the sky, and the fish of the sea shall fail:

4that neither any one may plead, nor any one reprove another; but my people are as a priest spoken against.

5Therefore they shall fall by day, and the prophet with thee shall fall: I have compared thy mother unto night.

6My people are like as if they had no knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt not minister as priest to me: and as thou has forgotten the law of thy God, I also will forget thy children.

7According to their multitude, so they sinned against me: I will turn their glory into shame.

8They will devour the sins of my people, and will set their hearts on their iniquities.

9And the priest shall be as the people: and I will avenge on them their ways, and I will recompense to them their counsels.

10And they shall eat, and shall not be satisfied: they have gone a-whoring, and shall by no means prosper: because they have left off to take heed to the Lord.

11The heart of my people has gladly engaged in fornication and wine and strong drink.

12They asked counsel by means of signs, and they reported answer to them by their staves: they have gone astray in a spirit of whoredom, and gone grievously a-whoring from their God.

13They have sacrificed on the tops of the mountains, and on the hills they have sacrificed under the oak and poplar, and under the shady tree, because the shade was good: therefore your daughters shall go a-whoring, and your daughters-in-law shall commit adultery.

14And I will not visit upon your daughters when they shall commit fornication, nor your daughters-in-law when they shall commit adultery: for they themselves mingled themselves with harlots, and sacrificed with polluted ones, and the people that understood not entangled itself with a harlot.

15But thou, O Israel, be not ignorant, and go ye not, men of Juda, to Galgala; and go not up to the house of On, and swear not by the living Lord.

16For Israel was maddened like a mad heifer: now the Lord will feed them as a lamb in a wide place.

17Ephraim, joined with idols, has laid stumbling-blocks in his own way.

18He has chosen the Chananites: they have grievously gone a-whoring: they have loved dishonour through her insolence.

19Thou art a blast of wind in her wings, and they shall be ashamed because of their altars.”
-Hosea 4

Here in Numbers we see that Israelite men fornicated with the daughters of Moab and were drawn away to worship of their idols.

“1And Israel sojourned in Sattin, and the people profaned itself by going a-whoring after the daughters of Moab. 2And they called them to the sacrifices of their idols; and the people ate of their sacrifices, and worshipped their idols.”
-Numbers 25

One Israelite man even dared to flaunt his fornication before the assembly parading a Moabitess before the faithful of Israel who were greatly distraught at this vulgar display. Phineas was enraged by this and following them to the tent ran his spear through the copulating pair. For this zealous act God’s wrath was quieted and Phineas was blessed with a priesthood.

God knew that the idolatry and fornication of Israel would be a very destructive force and we are plagued by it and the results thereof to this day. Exodus issues this commandment and warning to Israel.

“13Ye shall destroy their altars, and break in pieces their pillars, and ye shall cut down their groves, and the graven images of their gods ye shall burn with fire. 14For ye shall not worship strange gods, for the Lord God, a jealous name, is a jealous God; 15lest at any time thou make a covenant with the dwellers on the land, and they go a whoring after their gods, and sacrifice to their gods, and they call thee, and thou shouldest eat of their feasts, 16and thou shouldest take of their daughters to thy sons, and thou shouldest give of thy daughters to their sons; and thy daughters should go a whoring after their gods, and thy sons should go a whoring after their gods.”
-Exodus 34

Again in Joshua we are warned what will come of mingling with the Canaanite nations who we failed to deal with as commanded.

“10One of you has chased a thousand, for the Lord our God, he fought for you, as he said to us. 11And take ye great heed to love the Lord our God. 12For if ye shall turn aside and attach yourselves to these nations that are left with you, and make marriages with them, and become mingled with them and they with you, 13know that the Lord will no more destroy these nations from before you; and they will be to you snares and stumbling-blocks, and nails in your heels, and darts in your eyes, until ye be destroyed from off this good land, which the Lord your God has given you.”
-Joshua 23

The Canaanites and their hybrid offspring have indeed been snares, stumbling-blocks, nails in our heels, and darts in our eyes leading us ever further into fornication through their multicultural agenda of White genocide.

https://christogenea.org/articles/camp-saints-revisited

There are several instances in Scripture where the act of adultery is associated with idolatry and the related sexual acts. The word adultery in these passages is translated from a group of words deriving from moichos (G3428 through 3432).

Moichos certainly does refer to extramarital sexual relations in many instances but it also often refers figuratively to idolatry and the related sexual acts. This is seen in Isaiah 57.3 (G3432), Jeremiah 5.7 (G3428), 9.2 (G3428), 13.27 (G3430), 23.14 (G3428), Hosea 4.2 (G3430), 4.13-14 (G3431), and several other passages.

Lexicon: Anglo-Græco-Latinum Novi Testamenti by Andrew Symson, provides under the entry “adulterer” for the Greek word moichos: “it maketh a confusion in families, through an illegitimate brood.” In Critica Sacra Edward Leigh says of the Greek word moichos: “nam familias confundit illegitima sobole,” which is translated “for it mingles families with an illegal race.”

In the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament the reputable German scholar of Greek Gerhard Kittel offers this definition under the entry for moicheuo: “of the intermingling of animals and men or of different races.” In A Patristic Greek Lexicon Geoffrey Hugo Lampe offers for the verb moichaomai the definition “adulterate”.

In Griechisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch Hjalmar Frisk defines the word moichaomai with the German word “verfälschen” which means to adulterate. In A Patristic Greek Lexicon Geoffrey Hugo Lampe defines the adjective moichozeuktikos thusly: “of or relating to an adulterous marriage.” An adulterous marriage you might ask? Is adultery not strictly an extramarital affair? Not according to all archaic uses of the word in English.

In A Greek and English Lexicon to the New Testament by John Parkhurst under the definition for moichalis, the author comments on Matthew 16.4: “Dr. Doddridge interprets [genea moichalis] ‘a spurious race degenerated…'”

In A Comprehensive Lexicon by John Pickering we find the following definition for the noun moichidios: “bastard, spurious.” Lexicon Manuale by Cornelius Schrevel, moichidios is defined in Latin by “adulterinus.” in the Oxford Latin Dictionary adulterinus is defined as “adulterated, impure.” and Lewis and Short add “not full-blooded.”

We can see from the definitions provided that moicheia is not strictly adultery against a spouse (Leviticus 20.10, Matthew 5.32, Mark 10.12 et al.) but also adulteration of racial stock. This of course ties in with the nature of idolatry and its associations with adultery and fornication. 

God’s covenant with Israel is portrayed in Scripture as a marriage covenant (Isaiah 54.1-4, Hosea 2.7, Jeremiah 31.32 et al.) and every instance of idolatry and fornication with the children of other gods is an act of adultery (Jeremiah 13.27, 3.8, Ezekiel 16.30-34 et al.). Thus for the people of God’s covenant to miscegenate is a transgression of the marriage covenant and the commandment; “thou shalt not commit adultery”.

Ezra 9 describes the error of Judah in taking Canaanite wives. We see that this mongrelization is a cause of great distress in Judah.

“1And when these things were finished, the princes drew near to me, saying, The people of Israel, and the priests, and the Levites, have not separated themselves from the people of the lands in their abominations, even the Chananite, the Ethite, the Pherezite, the Jebusite, the Ammonite, the Moabite, and the Moserite and the Amorite. 2For they have taken of their daughters for themselves and their sons; and the holy seed has passed among the nations of the lands, and the hand of the rulers has been first in this transgression.”
-Ezra 9

As we see today the rulers and priesthood were the ones who foremost transgressed in this manner. Today the churches have become cesspools of mongrelization, promoting interracial marriage and embracing non-Adamic races while the ministers eagerly promote this sin. In the following chapter we find the Judahites have a plan to repent and separate from the alien wives and their bastards.

“1So when Esdras had prayed, and when he had confessed, weeping and praying before the house of God, a very great assembly of Israel came together to him, men and women and youths; for the people wept, and wept aloud. 2And Sechenias the son of Jeel, of the sons of Elam, answered and said to Esdras, We have broken covenant with our God, and have taken strange wives of the nations of the land: yet now there is patience of hope to Israel concerning this thing. 3Now then let us make a covenant with our God, to put away all the wives, and their offspring, as thou shalt advise: 4arise, and alarm them with the commands of our God; and let it be done according to the law. Rise up, for the matter is upon thee; and we are with thee: be strong and do. 5Then Esdras arose, and caused the rulers, the priests, and Levites, and all Israel, to swear that they would do according to this word: and they swore. 6And Esdras rose up from before the house of God, and went to the treasury of Joanan the son of Elisub; he even went thither: he ate no bread, and drank no water; for he mourned over the unfaithfulness of them of the captivity. 7And they made proclamation throughout Juda and Jerusalem to all the children of the captivity, that they should assemble at Jerusalem, saying, 8Every one who shall not arrive within three days, as is the counsel of the rulers and the elders, all his substance shall be forfeited, and he shall be separated from the congregation of the captivity. 9So all the men of Juda and Benjamin assembled at Jerusalem within the three days. This was the ninth month: on the twentieth day of the month all the people sat down in the street of the house of the Lord, because of their alarm concerning the word, and because of the storm. 10And Esdras the priest arose, and said to them, Ye have broken covenant, and have taken strange wives, to add to the trespass of Israel. 11Now therefore give praise to the Lord God of our fathers, and do that which is pleasing in his sight: and separate yourselves from the peoples of the land, and from the strange wives. 12Then all the congregation answered and said, This thy word is powerful upon us to do it. 13But the people is numerous, and the season is stormy, and there is no power to stand without, and the work is more than enough for one day or for two; for we have greatly sinned in this matter. 14Let now our rulers stand, and for all those in our cities who have taken strange wives, let them come at appointed times, and with them elders from every several city, and judges, to turn away the fierce wrath of our God from us concerning this matter. 15Only Jonathan the son of Asael, and Jazias the son of Thecoe were with me concerning this; and Mesollam, and Sabbathai the Levite helped them. 16And the children of the captivity did thus: and Esdras the priest, and heads of families according to their house were separated, and all by their names, for they returned in the first day of the tenth month to search out the matter. 17And they made an end with all the men who had taken strange wives by the first day of the first month.”
-Ezra 10

In Nehemiah we find a witness to a similar circumstance where we see Judah repent from its idolatry and fornication and segregate itself from all aliens. Clearly these Judahites understood the importance of racial separation according to the law.

“1Now on the twenty-fourth day of this month the children of Israel assembled with fasting, and in sackcloths, and with ashes on their head. 2And the children of Israel separated themselves from every stranger, and stood and confessed their sins, and the iniquities of their fathers. 3And they stood in their place, and read in the book of the law of the Lord their god: and they confessed their sins to the Lord, and worshipped the Lord their God.”
-Nehemiah 9

These passages stand as an example for us as to how one must go about repenting of mixed unions and offspring. We see in chapter 10 of Nehemiah that those of Judah who did not transgress in this way admonished the rest to be separate from the Canaanites. So Christians must do today, excommunicating those who would try to bring a bastard into the congregation of the Lord.

“28And the rest of the people, the priests, the Levites, the porters, the singers, the Nathinim, and every one who drew off from the nations of the land to the law of God, their wives, their sons, their daughters, every one who had knowledge and understanding, 29were urgent with their brethren, and bound them under a curse, and entered into a curse, and into an oath, to walk in the law of God, which was given by the hand of Moses, the servant of God; to keep and to do all the commandments of the Lord, and his judgments, and his ordinances; 30and that we will not, they said, give our daughters to the people of the land, nor will we take their daughters to our sons.”
-Nehemiah 10

It was doubtless difficult for the men of Judah to put away their mongrel wives and offspring as seen in these passages but one must understand the importance of Adamic posterity. Christ said at Luke 14.26 that we must put God before our own kin. Surely if we put bastard offspring before the commandments of God we cannot be his disciples.

Many teachers in the mainstream churches realize to some extent that God commanded racial separation for the children of Israel, however most such teachers believe this is no longer commanded. They claim that since the Gentiles are under the New Covenant that the commandments to be separate can no longer apply. This is absolutely false, for we Gentiles under the New Covenant are none other than the dispersed Israelites scattered abroad and we are surely still expected to keep God’s commandments.

‘The New Covenant with Israel’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-new-covenant-with-israel/

‘The Dispersions of Israel: a Company of Nations’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/02/10/the-dispersions-of-israel-a-company-of-nations/

Throughout the New Testament Gentiles recieve instruction to abstain from fornication. Most are aware that this refers to sexual immorality in general but few accept that fornication means the same thing in the New Testament as in the Old Testament. This of course is foolishness.

The group of words used in the New Testament translated as “fornication”, “fornicate” and “fornicator” are the very same words used in the Old Testament to refer to the acts of miscegenation and idolatry.

Porneia, Strong’s G4202:
“fornication.
From porneuo; harlotry (including adultery and incest); figuratively, idolatry — fornication.”

Thayer:
“1) illicit sexual intercourse
1a) adultery, fornication, homosexuality, lesbianism, intercourse with animals etc. 
1b) sexual intercourse with close relatives; Lev. 18
1c) sexual intercourse with a divorced man or woman; Mk. 10:11,12 2) metaph. the worship of idols 
2a) of the defilement of idolatry, as incurred by eating the sacrifices offered to idols”

Porneuo, Strong’s G4203:
“commit fornication.
From porne; to act the harlot, i.e. (literally) indulge unlawful lust (of either sex), or (figuratively) practise idolatry — commit (fornication).”

Thayer:
“1) to prostitute one’s body to the lust of another
2) to give one’s self to unlawful sexual intercourse 
2a) to commit fornication 
3) metaph. to be given to idolatry, to worship idols 
3a) to permit one’s self to be drawn away by another into idolatry”

Porne, Strong’s G4204:
“prostitute, harlot
Feminine of pornos; a strumpet; figuratively, an idolater — harlot, whore.”

Thayer:
“1) a woman who sells her body for sexual uses
1a) a prostitute, a harlot, one who yields herself to defilement for the sake of gain 
1b) any woman indulging in unlawful sexual intercourse, whether for gain or for lust 
2) metaph. an idolatress 
2a) of “Babylon” i.e. Rome, the chief seat of idolatry”

Pornos, Strong’s G4205:
“fornicator, whoremonger.
From pernemi (to sell; akin to the base of piprasko); a (male) prostitute (as venal), i.e. (by analogy) a debauchee (libertine) — fornicator, whoremonger.”

Thayer:
“1) a man who prostitutes his body to another’s lust for hire
2) a male prostitute 
3) a man who indulges in unlawful sexual intercourse, a fornicator”

Earlier on in this presentation we looked at Deuteronomy 23.2 and the meaning of the Hebrew word mamzer. In the Septuagint Deuteronomy 23.2 reads “one born of a harlot (G4204)” rather than “a bastard (H4464)”. As we have seen above a porne/harlot is associated with idolatry and fornication and in ancient Canaan a typical prostitute would’ve been a pagan temple prostitute of impure or unknown stock. Thus the Greek text of Deuteronomy 23.2 agrees with the Hebrew in its basic meaning, though it is more specific.

The Latin text of Deuteronomy 23.2 simply transliterates mamzer but offers the note “hoc est de scorto natus” meaning “that is to say, one born of whoredom”. This translation agrees with the Greek while retaining the original Hebrew word for a mongrel.

Adultery, harlotry and miscegenation are all inextricably linked in Scripture. It is also evident in Scripture that miscegenation is forbidden and thus fits the definitions of illicit or unlawful.

Some Christians will undoubtedly claim that the imperative to not miscegenate is a relic of the law given at Sinai. While Christians are no longer bound to the rituals of the law we are bound to the moral commandments and it cannot be said that Israel’s duty to abstain from miscegenation was in any way a ritualistic ordinance. In fact we find long before Sinai that miscegenation is an act of fornication as we shall see very clearly later on.

https://christogenea.org/podcasts/christian-foundations

As we have already seen, miscegenation is a breach of the commandment “thou shalt not commit adultery”. Furthermore, it was established at the Council of Jerusalem that we are to abstain from fornication. The decree to the Gentiles at the Council of Jerusalem was concerning the relationship of the Gentiles to the law, and if the definition of fornication had been changed this would’ve been the perfect opportunity to say so, but the Apostles did not. Rather it was simply stated that we must abstain from fornication.

“23 And they wrote letters by them after this manner; The apostles and elders and brethren send greeting unto the brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia.

24 Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no such commandment:

25 It seemed good unto us, being assembled with one accord, to send chosen men unto you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul,

26 Men that have hazarded their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.

27 We have sent therefore Judas and Silas, who shall also tell you the same things by mouth.

28 For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things;

29 That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.”
-Acts 15

There are several witnesses in the New Testament which clearly refute the notion that the Scriptural definition of fornication was changed at the establishment of the New Covenant. Here St. Paul writes to the Dorian Greeks of Corinth. These Corinthians were descendants of the ancient dispersion of Israel among the Greeks.

‘Dardan, Danaan and Dorian Origins: the Mediterranean Migrations of Ancient Israel’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/dardan-danaan-and-dorian-origins-the-mediterranean-migrations-of-israel-2/

Here St. Paul refers to Numbers 25 where God destroyed a portion of Israel for fornicating with with the Moabites as did some of the Israelites among the forebears of both St. Paul and the Corinthians.

“1 Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea;

2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea;

3 And did all eat the same spiritual meat;

4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.

5 But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness.

6 Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted.

7 Neither be ye idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play.

8 Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and fell in one day three and twenty thousand.”
-Corinthians 10

Clearly St. Paul is instructing his readers to abstain from the sin committed by their ancient Israelite forebears which was miscegenation. The one who led Israel to fornication with Moab was Balaam and for this he is condemned throughout Scripture.

In the epistle of St. Jude “the error of Balaam” is mentioned in relation to the sin of the fallen Angels bound in “chains of darkness” who mongrelized creation.

‘The Origins of the Non-Adamic Races’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/02/02/the-origins-of-the-non-adamic-races/

https://christogenea.org/podcasts/divers-seed-defiles-families-or-how-angels-become-chained-darkness

The error of Balaam is also mentioned alongside the sin of Sodom and Gomorrha in “going after strange flesh”. Some claim this verse refers to homophilia, but this interpretation is the opposite of the meaning of the Greek text which uses sarkos (Strong’s G4561 meaning “flesh”) heteras (G2087 meaning “different”, “altered” or “strange”). Heteras is an antonym of homou (G3674) which gives us the prefix homo.

“5 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.

6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains of darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

8 Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.

9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.

10 But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.

11 Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.

12 These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;

13 Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.”
-Jude 1

Later in his epistle Jude quotes Enoch concerning the judgement of these idolaters, fornicators and mongrels. In all the extant Enoch literature we find the consistent theme of mongrelization as as a grevious sin and the mongrels as worthy of destruction.

“9 And to Gabriel said the Lord: ‘Proceed against the bastards and the reprobates, and against the children of fornication: and destroy [the children of fornication and] the children of the Watchers from amongst men [and cause them to go forth]: send them one against the other that they may destroy each other in battle: for length of days shall they not have.”
-Enoch 10

St. Jude’s words remind us also of the words of St. Peter in chapter 2 of his second epistle. Here we again see the condemnation of the forces and acts of miscegenation in the Old Testament and fittingly these sins are associated with those who would seek to deceive and undermine Christendom.

“1 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.

2 And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.

3 And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.

4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;

5 And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;

6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;

7 And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:

8 (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;)

9 The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished:

10 But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities.

11 Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring not railing accusation against them before the Lord.

12 But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption;

13 And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you;

14 Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:

15 Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness;

16 But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man’s voice forbad the madness of the prophet.

17 These are wells without water, clouds that are carried with a tempest; to whom the mist of darkness is reserved for ever.”
-2 Peter 2

So we see from the epistles of St. Jude and St. Peter the condemnation of miscegenation as an act of fornication and the reminder that the results of that sin plague us to this day. They remain among us as blemishes, spots in our feasts of charity (recall the definition of mamzer), snares, stumbling-blocks, nails in our heels, and darts in our eyes as prophecied (Joshua 23.13).

St. Peter also mentions Noah’s preservation from the flood when God destroyed the Adamites and their bastard offspring from the land. Noah was chosen to preserve the Adamic race because he was “perfect in his race”. (Genesis 6.9, genea, Strong’s G1074 meaning “race”or “family”).

The error of Balaam is mentioned yet again in Revelation chapter 2 where we again see Israel mingling with Moab defined as an act of fornication.

“12 And to the angel of the church in Pergamos write; These things saith he which hath the sharp sword with two edges;

13 I know thy works, and where thou dwellest, even where Satan’s seat is: and thou holdest fast my name, and hast not denied my faith, even in those days wherein Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth.

14 But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication.

15 So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes, which thing I hate.

16 Repent; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth.”
-Revelation 2

In his epistle to the Hebrews St. Paul describes Esau as a fornicator and profane person. As we have seen earlier in this presentation Esau was indeed a fornicator. His act of fornication was miscegenation and he is never recorded as having had extramarital or incestuous sexual relations. Rather as we saw earlier in this article his marriages themselves were condemned because his wives were taken of the mongrel Canaanites.

“14 Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:

15 Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled;

16 Lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.”
-Hebrews 12

In John chapter 8 Jesus is adressing his Judaean detractors. As history and Scripture attest these Judaeans were descended from bastardized seed of Abraham through the fornication of Esau and Judah.

‘The Satanic Origins of the Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews’ https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-satanic-origins-of-the-edomite-jews/

These Judaeans tried to justify themselves by stating their descent from Abraham and denying being born of fornication. Christ affirms that they are indeed spurious where in verses 42-44 he calls them sons of the devil.

“37 I know that ye are Abraham’s seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you.

38 I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.

39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.

41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.

42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.

43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.

44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”
-John 8

These Judaean’s denial of their bastardized heritage in verse 41 is a reference to Malachi 2 where we find that Judah has married the daughter of a strange God. This of course refers to the mingling of the sons of Judah with the daughters of Canaan who indeed descended in part from the devil’s brood. Thus Jesus rightly tells them they do the deeds of their father the devil. One may descend paternally from the patriarchs but if one is born of miscegenation they are cut off and belong to the devil.

“10Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why then doth every one of us despise his brother, violating the covenant of our fathers?

11Juda hath transgressed, and abomination hath been committed in Israel, and in Jerusalem: for Juda hath profaned the holiness of the Lord, which he loved, and hath married the daughter of a strange god.

12The Lord will cut off the man that hath done this, both the master, and the scholar, out of the tabernacles of Jacob, and him that offereth an offering to the Lord of hosts.”
-Malachi 2

Some will point to the law of the proselyte in the Old Testament as evidence that the Israelite ethno-religion was racially compromising, however Scripture disproves this. Under the Old Covenant only non-Israelites of Adamic stock were permitted to live among Israel and were expected to keep the laws given to Israel. Racial aliens are specifically excluded.

“43And the Lord said to Moses and Aaron, This is the law of the passover: no stranger (allogenes, G241 meaning literally “of another race” i.e. a non-Adamite) shall eat of it. 44And every slave or servant bought with money—him thou shalt circumcise, and then shall he eat of it. 45A sojourner or hireling shall not eat of it. 46In one house shall it be eaten, and ye shall not carry of the flesh out from the house; and a bone of it ye shall not break. 47All the congregation of the children of Israel shall keep it. 48And if any proselyte shall come to you to keep the passover to the Lord, thou shalt circumcise every male of him, and then shall he approach to sacrifice it, and he shall be even as the original inhabitant of the land; no uncircumcised person shall eat of it. 49There shall be one law to the native, and to the proselyte coming among you.”
-Exodus 12

We also find other Scriptures which remind us of the proselyte’s obligation to the law (Leviticus 24.22, Numbers 9.14, 15.15-16). These ordinances set the precedent for later Christian assemblies. The Israelite nations with whom the New Covenant was made co-existed with the remnants of the various Adamic nations who had preceded them into Europe, the Mediterranean Basin and Asia Minor. Under this provision of the law these other Adamites dwell among us as Christians, circumcised in their hearts, keeping the statutes of Israel and sharing in the passover.

‘The Tree of Life: Redemption of the Adamic Race’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/the-tree-of-life-redemption-of-the-adamic-race/

In attempting to defend miscegenation many have claimed that certain women who married Israelites were of alien racial stock. Of course even if they were not in error in claiming these women were racial aliens, such alleged exceptions could never negate the rules laid out in Scripture which condemn miscegenation. Here I will not discuss these errors at any great length as better scholars have already undertaken that work.

https://comparet.christogenea.org/sermons/whom-did-moses-marry

https://christogenea.org/podcasts/ruth-was-israelite-ruth-was-not-moabite-race

https://christogenea.org/podcasts/women-genealogy-christ-06-21-09

It is often claimed that Zipporah was a negress like certain modern inhabitants of Ethiopia but it is clear that Zipporah was a Midianite from the Cush/Ethiopia of Asia (Herodotus, Histories 3.94, 7.70, Josephus Antiquities 1.6.2). This is apparent from the fact that Moses met her in Midian (Exodus 2.15), of which her father was high priest (2.16) and that her father Jethro is elsewhere called a Midianite (Numbers 10.29).

Even so, it can be demonstrated that the Ethiopians of the Horn of Africa were originally a goodly Adamic race and not the mongrelized Caucasoid-Congoid hybrids who dwell there today. Thus even on the basis of the errant assumption that Zipporah was from the Southern Ethiopia one could not rightly accuse Moses of fornication.

‘Concerning the Ancient Aethiops’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/28/concerning-the-ancient-aethiops/

Some claim that Ruth was a racial Moabitess as she is called a Moabitess in the book of Ruth, however it can be established that she was an Israelite by race and only a Moabitess by geography. Such references to Israelites as inhabitants of regions in Canaan are elsewhere found in our Old Testament at 2 Samuel 23. There we see Israelite warriors are named as Beerothite, Pirathonite, Shaalbonite and Ammonite etc. according to their habitation and not their race.

It is certain that in the time of Ruth Moab belonged to the Israelites as Scripture clearly informs us (Numbers 21.25-29, Deuteronomy 3.12-16, Judges 11.12-26, Zephaniah 2.9, Isaiah 25.10). Only a small portion of the territory of Moab was retained by the Moabites South of the river Arnon, bordered by the land given to the tribe of Reuben in the North, and by Edom in the South.

In Deuteronomy 23.3 we are told that a Moabite is excluded from the congregation of Israel even to the tenth generation. Ruth’s descendant David only a few generations later was certainly a part of the congregation (Psalm 40.9) and was a man treasured by God. Certainly his ancestor Ruth could not have been a Moabite and to claim otherwise is an insult to God and his law.

It is further proven that Ruth was an Israelite in Ruth 4 where we find she is redeemed by Boaz, an Israelite. Another Israelite man was first in line to redeem her (thus even closer kin) yet could not due to his personal circumstances. According to the law the role of a redeemer could only be fulfilled by a kinsmen (Deuteronomy 25.5-10) and so her redeemer had to have been kindred. Obviously her kindred were Israelites.

Some point to Ruth 1.16 where Ruth’s words are commonly translated “your people shall be my people and your God shall be my God” yet the words “shall be” are not to be found in the Greek, Hebrew or Latin text but are merely inserted by later translators acting upon their errant interpretations. Better translations are provided by the Wycliffe Bible and Young’s Literal translation which read “thi puple is my puple, and thi God is my God” and “thy people is my people, and thy God my God.”.

Some claim that Rahab was a Canaanite but there is no Scripture whatsoever to support this. It is simply errantly assumed that she was a Canaanite because she inhabited a city of Canaan, yet so did many Hebrews such as Abraham himself as well as the Adamic Philistines and so we cannot simply assume that any inhabitant of Canaan was a racial Canaanite. Such an assumption is certainly errant, especially when it implies illicit ancestry in the genealogy of our Lord Jesus Christ.

It is amply clear throughout the law, the prophets, and the writings of the apostles that the definition of fornication includes miscegenation and remains the same as when God established it. It refers to sexual deviancy in all its forms, and that clearly still includes miscegenation. To deny this is to deny much of the essential fabric of Scripture. This is an expansive topic which ties in to every facet of Scripture in some way, but I hope that here I have made a compelling case for the importance of racial separatism for the children of God.

“1Hear these things, ye priests; and attend, O house of Israel; and hearken, O house of the king; for the controversy is with you, because ye have been a snare in Scopia, and as a net spread on Itabyrium,

2which they that hunt the prey have fixed: but I will correct you.

3I know Ephraim, and Israel is not far from me: for now Ephraim has gone grievously a-whoring, Israel is defiled.

4They have not framed their counsels to return to their God, for the spirit of fornication is in them, and they have not known the Lord.

5And the pride of Israel shall be brought low before his face; and Israel and Ephraim shall fall in their iniquities; and Judas also shall fall with them.

6They shall go with sheep and calves diligently to seek the Lord; but they shall not find him, for he has withdrawn himself from them.

7For they have forsaken the Lord; for strange children have been born to them: now shall the cankerworm devour them and their heritages.”
-Hosea 5

“12The heaven is amazed at this, and is very exceedingly horror-struck, saith the Lord. 13For my people has committed two faults, and evil ones: they have forsaken me, the fountain of water of life, and hewn out for themselves broken cisterns, which will not be able to hold water.”
-Jeremiah 2

“15Drink waters out of thine own vessels, and out of thine own springing wells 16Let not waters out of thy fountain be spilt by thee, but let thy waters go into thy streets. 17Let them be only thine own, and let no stranger partake with thee. 18Let thy fountain of water be truly thine own; and rejoice with the wife of thy youth. 19Let thy loving hart and thy graceful colt company with thee, and let her be considered thine own, and be with thee at all times; for ravished with her love thou shalt be greatly increased. 20Be not intimate with a foreign woman, neither fold thyself in the arms of a woman not thine own.”
-Proverbs 5



Featured

The Dispersions of Israel: a Company of Nations

‘The Good Shepherd’
-Frederick James Shields

The prevailing narrative among most Christians today is that the Jews of today are the offspring of Judah, and that this supposed house of Judah is the only remnant of racial Israelites left in the world.

This of course puzzles many people, for these Jews have historically been enemies of Christianity and every bastion of Christian morality in the West. Could the elect people chosen by God truly be a race of usurers, pornography producers, human traffickers, blasphemers, blood drinkers, thieves, and ritual murderers?

https://christogenea.org/podcasts/protocols-of-satan

https://christogenea.org/articles/jewish-ritual-murder

Most certainly not. The Jews of today are neither Judahites nor Israelites but are a racial conglomeration of Kenites, Canaanites and Edomites. They are primarily descended from the Edomites who were conquered converted and integrated into Judaea in 125 BC by John Hyrcanus.

‘The Satanic Origins of the Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews’

https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-satanic-origins-of-the-edomite-jews/

Regardless of these facts, even if they were the House of Judah as they falsely claim, it would not make them the heirs of the Israelite legacy as they would have us believe. The overwhelming majority of the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob-Israel vanished from the Near East 1,600-700 years before the birth of Jesus Christ to fulfill the promise to Jacob-Israel that his “seed” would “become many nations” and “a company of nations”. Not one nation in Canaan.

The greater portion of Israel never had any part in the tribe of Judah, the Kingdom of Judah or the province of Judaea, and none of them were ever called Jews. Christians however fulfill all promise and prophecy concerning Israel to date.

Christ said plainly in Matthew 15.24 that He came only unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. This refers to both spiritually lost Judaean Israelites and the Israelites dispersed among the nations. The latter are the same “sheep of another fold” as mentioned in John 10.16.

Opening his epistle St. James greets all twelve tribes of Israel “which are scattered abroad”. Not just the three tribes present among the Judaeans (Judah, Benjamin and Levi).

“1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.”
-James 1

Here St. Peter addresses his epistle to “those who are elect exiles of the dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia”. St. Peter of course refers to the dispersed Israelites scattered about Asia Minor known to history as Celts, Romans, Greeks and Scythians.

“1 Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, To those who are elect exiles of the dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, 2 who have been chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through the sanctifying work of the Spirit, to be obedient to Jesus Christ and sprinkled with his blood: Grace and peace be yours in abundance.”
-1 Peter 1

When St. Paul stood before the Edomite Herod Agrippa he gave account of his conversion to Christianity and the mission laid before him by God to minister to all twelve tribes of Israel. Note that here we see clearly that the twelve tribes are distinct from the Judaeans and that the Judaeans are in fact in opposition to the interests of the twelve tribes.

“4 My manner of life from my youth, which was at the first among mine own nation at Jerusalem, know all the Judeans;
5 Which knew me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straitest sect of our religion I lived a Pharisee.
6 And now I stand and am judged for the hope of the promise made of God, unto our fathers:
7 Unto which promise our twelve tribes, instantly serving God day and night, hope to come. For which hope’s sake, king Agrippa, I am accused of the Judeans.”
-Acts 26

In the space of 1,000 years every White nation of Europe embraced the prophecied Christ and came to be called by his name. There is only one Abrahamic faith and only one annointed race and they are Christianity and the Christian peoples of Europe and the European diaspora.

‘The New Covenant with Israel’

https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-new-covenant-with-israel/

‘Christianity: the Only Abrahamic Faith’

https://facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=298422360761599&id=296739117596590

The real Israelites:

Have been dispersed to the North and the West, Tarshish (Tartessus, Iberia), Put (the North African coastlands), Lud (Lydia, Anatolia), Persia, Meshech (Moscow, Russia), Tubal (Tobolsk, Russia), Greece and to the isles afar off: Isaiah 49.1 & 12, 66.19, Jeremiah 3.18, 31.8.

Are comprised of mighty nations, having command of the waters, coasts and vast lands and possessing the gates of their enemies: Genesis 22.17, 24.60, 49.25, Numbers 24.7, Deuteronomy 33.13 & 19, Psalm 89.25.

Are a company or commonwealth of nations: Genesis 35.11, 48.19, Ephesians 2.12.

Are the custodians of God’s word: Psalm 147.19-20; Isaiah 59.21.

Have multitudinous seed: Genesis 13.16, 15.5, 22.17, 24.60, 26.4 & 24, 28.3 & 14, 32.12.

Colonize and spread abroad: Genesis 28.14, Deuteronomy 33.17, Psalm 2.8, Isaiah 26.15, 27.6, 54.2-3, Zechariah 10.8-9.

Have a descendant of King David ruling over them: 2 Samuel 7.13, 1 Chronicles 22.10, 2 Chronicles 13.5, Psalm 89.35-37, Jeremiah 33.17.

‘Scythian Origins: the Lost Tribes in Iran, the Steppe and Europe’

https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/scythian-origins-the-lost-tribes-in-iran-the-steppe-and-europe-2/

‘The Israelite Origins of Europa: the Phoenicians in the West’

https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-israelite-origins-of-europa-the-phoenicians-in-the-west/

‘Dardan, Danaan and Dorian Origins: the Mediterranean Migrations of Ancient Israel’

https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/dardan-danaan-and-dorian-origins-the-mediterranean-migrations-of-israel-2/

“22 And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.
23 But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.
24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
-Matthew 15

“27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:

28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.

29 My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my hand.”
-John 10

“8Behold, I bring them from the north, and will gather them from the end of the earth to the feast of the passover: and the people shall beget a great multitude, and they shall return hither.

9They went forth with weeping, and I will bring them back with consolation, causing them to lodge by the channels of waters in a straight way, and they shall not err in it: for I am become a father to Israel, and Ephraim is my first-born.

10Hear the words of the Lord, ye nations, and proclaim them to the islands afar off; say, He that scattered Israel will also gather him, and keep him as one that feeds his flock.”
-Jeremiah 31

“1Hearken to me, ye islands; and attend, ye nations; after a long time it shall come to pass, saith the Lord: from my mother’s womb he has called my name:

2and he has made my mouth as a sharp sword, and he has hid me under the shadow of his hand; he has made me as a choice shaft, and he has hid me in his quiver;

3and said to me, Thou art my servant, O Israel, and in thee I will be glorified.

4Then I said, I have laboured in vain, I have given my strength for vanity and for nothing: therefore is my judgment with the Lord, and my labour before my God.

5And now, thus saith the Lord that formed me from the womb to be his own servant, to gather Jacob to him and Israel. I shall be gathered and glorified before the Lord, and my God shall be my strength.

6And he said to me, It is a great thing for thee to be called my servant, to establish the tribes of Jacob, and to recover the dispersion of Israel: behold, I have given thee for the covenant of a race, for a light of the nations, that thou shouldest be for salvation to the end of the earth.

7Thus saith the Lord that delivered thee, the God of Israel, Sanctify him that despises his life, him that is abhorred by the nations that are the servants of princes: kings shall behold him, and princes shall arise, and shall worship him, for the Lord’s sake: for the Holy One of Israel is faithful, and I have chosen thee.

8Thus saith the Lord, In an acceptable time have I heard thee, and in a day of salvation have I succored thee: and I have formed thee, and given thee for a covenant of the nations, to establish the earth, and to cause to inherit the desert heritages:

9saying to them that are in bonds, Go forth; and bidding them that are in darkness shew themselves. They shall be fed in all the ways, and in all the paths shall be their pasture.

10They shall not hunger, neither shall they thirst; neither shall the heat nor the sun smite them; but he that has mercy on them shall comfort them, and by fountains of waters shall he lead them.

11And I will make every mountain a way, and every path a pasture to them.

12Behold, these shall come from far: and these from the North and the West, and others from the land of the Persians.

13Rejoice, ye heavens; and let the earth be glad: let the mountains break forth with joy; for the Lord has had mercy on his people, and has comforted the lowly ones of his people.”
-Isaiah 49

“19And I will leave a sign upon them, and I will send forth them that have escaped of them to the nations, to Tharsis [Tartessus, Iberia, settled by Phoenician Israelites], and Phud [the North African coastlands, settled by Phoenician Israelites], and Lud [Lydia, Anatolia, settled by Kimmerian, Phoenician and Trojan Israelites], and Mosoch [Moscow, Russia, settled by Scythian Israelites], and to Thobel [Tobolsk, Russia, settled by Scythian Israelites], and to Greece [settled by Phoenician, Dorian and Danaan Israelites], and to the isles afar off [Britain and Ireland, settled by Scythian, Kimmerian, Phoenician, Danaan and Trojan Israelites], to those who have not heard my name, nor seen my glory; and they shall declare my glory among the nations.”
-Isaiah 66

“8 For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:
9 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.
10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people.”
-Hebrews 8

“35Thus saith the Lord, who gives the sun for a light by day, the moon and the stars for a light by night, and makes a roaring in the sea, so that the waves thereof roar; the Lord Almighty is his name:
36if these ordinances cease from before me, saith the Lord, then shall the race (genos, Strong’s G1085) of Israel cease to be a nation before me forever.
37Though the sky should be raised to a greater height, saith the Lord, and though the ground of the earth should be sunk lower beneath, yet I will not cast off the race of Israel, saith the Lord, for all that they have done.”
-Jeremiah 31

“9 But ye are a chosen race (genos, Strong’s G1085), a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light.”
-1 Peter 2


Sumer: the Civilization of Babel

Featured
Statue, Ebih II, Ur.

Biblical scholars have long generally agreed that the Shinar or Senaar of Genesis 11 where the Noahites all gathered after the flood is the Sumer of ancient Mesopotamia.

This is supported by the similarity in the two Semitic names (Sumer is an Akkadian word), the matching geographical descriptions and the association with Babel, Akkad and Uruk.

In Genesis 10.10 the empire of Nimrod is described as encompassing Babel, Akkad and Uruk in the land of Shinar. This seems to describe the Akkadian Empire which came to rule over Mesopotamia, the Levant and Anatolia.

In Genesis 11 the Noahites all gathered in Sumer/Shinar and there they shared in the same speech and custom:

“1And all the earth was one lip, and there was one language to all. 2And it came to pass as they moved from the east, they found a plain in the land of Senaar, and they dwelt there.”
-Genesis 11

Sumerian votive statue, Eshnunna.

The Sumerian language is known today as a linguistic isolate, but was once thought to be the origin of the Indo-European languages. A comparison between Sumerian and Indo-European was made by Charles Autran already in 1925, finding many similar roots and even suffixes, like -ta for the origin (Sanskrit -tas), -bi for the instrumental (Sanskrit -bhis).

Gordon Whittaker, since 1998, has identified so-called Euphratic, a substratum or superstratum in Sumerian, with an Indo-European language. Particularly interesting is his analysis of the phonetic values, without meaning in Sumerian, of pictographic symbols, which in some cases can suggest an IE connection.

The symbol for a fish is read peš, which recalls PIE *pisk/peisk- ‘fish’, perhaps from the Indo-European root pi- ‘to drink’ and the frequentative suffix -sk-. The symbol of a bird is read hu, and can be compared with PIE *hwi/hwai- ‘bird’ (notably Armenian hav meaning ‘chicken’).

The logogram for ‘dog’, with an animal head, is read lik, and recalls PIE *wlkwa- ‘wolf’, especially Greek lykos. The logogram for ‘fox’, with the symbol of a fox’s head with large ears, is read lib/lub, comparable to the PIE *wlpe- ‘fox’ (Latin vulpes, Greek alopex), which is apparently an offshoot or variant of the previous one (with kw > p).

The phonetic values for ‘prince’ are nar/nara, as in the Sanskrit term for ‘man, hero’ (ner/nir). In a publication of 2012, Whittaker has suggested laws of phonetic change from Euphratic to Sumerian, which is a necessary aspect in a scientific demonstration of the existence of this Indo-European language.

In support he cites other examples of phonetic values, like sah/suh for the sign ‘thread+thread’, recalling Sanskrit sū-tra-‘thread’, from the root s(y)ū- ‘to sew’, corresponding to Latin su-ere. Also of note is semed for the sign ‘one’, comparable to the PIE root *sam-, found e.g. in English same and Latin semel ‘once’.

Also Aleksi Sahala, Assyriologist of the University of Helsinki, has between 2009 and 2013 proposed 30 Sumerian words with a possible common etymology with Indo-European.

In 1927, the British explorer and scholar of Sanskrit, Laurence Waddell published a book with the title Aryan Origin of the Alphabet and Sumer-Aryan Dictionary.

Sumerian civilization was generally bilingual with the general populace being fluent in both Sumerian and Akkadian, the earliest attested Semitic language. Of course both languages used the same Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform.

Sumerian cuneiform account, Shuruppak.

Linguists regard the relationship between Sumerian and Akkadian as a “sprachbund”; a group of closely related languages with profound influence on one another from lexical borrowing on a large scale, to syntactic, morphological, and phonological convergence.

The Sumerian language is somewhat of a mystery to scholars. It is an isolate with no clear ancestors or descendants, but also with clear relationships with both Afro-Asiatic and Indo-European languages and potentially with other contemporary linguistic isolates such as Elamite.

Thus I would identify Sumerian or its parent language as the the united tongue of the Noahites described in Genesis 11.1. This explains why it is a distinct isolate with such diverse affinities with many far-flung languages such as Uralic, Kartvellian, Basque, Sanskrit and Armenian as well as contemporary Akkadian.

‘The Linguistic Developments of the Shemites, Hebrews and Israelites’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-linguistic-developments-of-the-shemites-hebrews-and-israelites/

In Shinar/Sumer the Noahites built ziggurats reaching to the sky. Ziggurats had spiritual significance to the ancient Mesopotamians who would erect altars at their peaks where they were closest to the heavens.

“3And a man said to his neighbour, Come, let us make bricks and bake them with fire. And the brick was to them for stone, and their mortar was bitumen. 4And they said, Come, let us build to ourselves a city and tower, whose top shall be to heaven, and let us make to ourselves a name, before we are scattered abroad upon the face of all the earth.”
-Genesis 11

The Sumerians introduced urban civilization and expanded their territory across Mesopotamia as far as Iran and Anatolia. Mesopotamian culture has, from ancient Sumer down to Babylon, been a very morally and sexually permissive culture. Lewd behavior was the norm with people frequently and freely enganging in public sex acts and all manner of sexual perversion. The pagan cults of Mesopotamia were among the most profane in all history. Temple prostitution, ritual miscegenation and human sacrifice were well known to the pagans of ancient Mesopotamia.

https://christogenea.org/essays/broken-cisterns

Ancient Sumer had degenerated into an immoral society in a short time quickly becoming an imperialistic, decadent, materialistic, perverse and idolatrous society. They reached towards the heavens and God above saw their pridefulness and sinfulness:

“5And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the sons of men built. 6And the Lord said, Behold, there is one people, and one lip of all, and they have begun to do this, and now nothing shall fail from them of all that they may have undertaken to do. 7Come, and having gone down let us there confound their tongue, that they may not understand each the voice of his neighbour. 8And the Lord scattered them thence over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city and the tower. 9On this account its name was called Confusion, because there the Lord confounded the languages of all the earth, and thence the Lord scattered them upon the face of all the earth.”
-Genesis 11

Statue, Eannatum, Lagash.

Interestingly the narrative of Genesis 11 is comparable to parts of the Sumerian epic Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta. In this tale Enmerkar of Uruk is building a massive ziggurat in Eridu and demands a tribute of precious materials from Aratta for its construction. At one point he recites an incantation imploring the god Enki to restore (or in Kramer’s translation, to disrupt) the linguistic unity of the inhabited regions which are named as Shubur, Hamazi, Sumer, Uri-ki (Akkad), and the Martu land. While quite different from the Genesis 11 account, both accounts contain the association of the construction of a large ziggurat with divine powers disrupting linguistic unity.

From this time hence forth the Noahites began to disperse from Mesopotamia through the whole of the Fertile Crescent, the Mediterranean Basin, and other points in Eurasia and North Africa.

These nations include the ancient tribes of Europe such as Tartesians, Rhodians, Ionians, Thracians and Lydians and Etruscans as well as White tribes of the Near East like the Medes, Aramaeans, Persians and Pharaonic Egyptians among others.

These are the ancestors of all Caucasians alive today and the broadest possible group of recipients of any promise or blessing from God.

Sumerian votive statues, Eshnunna.

‘Adam: The Patriarch of One Race’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/adam-the-patriarch-of-one-race/

‘The Tree of Life: Redemption of the Adamic Race’

https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/the-tree-of-life-redemption-of-the-adamic-race/

https://christogenea.org/essays/race-genesis-10

The Satanic Origins of the Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews

Featured
‘Christ Brought before Caiaphas’, Salvin Hours.

The people who bear the name of Jews today are commonly regarded by the denominational churches as the legitimate and whole chosen people of Scripture. This is of course utterly erroneous on several levels, and here we will expose the nature of these devilish falsehoods.

The greater portion of Israel never had any part in the tribe of Judah, the Kingdom of Judah or the province of Judaea, and none of them were ever called Jews. The vast majority of the children of Israel left Egypt and Western Asia between 3,600-2,700 years ago to fulfill the promise to Jacob-Israel that his “seed” would “become many nations” and “a company of nations”.

‘The Dispersions of Israel: a Company of Nations’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/02/10/the-dispersions-of-israel-a-company-of-nations/

‘Scythian Origins: the Lost Tribes in Iran, the Steppe and Europe’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/scythian-origins-the-lost-tribes-in-iran-the-steppe-and-europe-2/

‘The Israelite Origins of Europa: the Phoenicians in the West’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-israelite-origins-of-europa-the-phoenicians-in-the-west/

‘Dardan, Danaan and Dorian Origins: the Mediterranean Migrations of Ancient Israel’

‘The New Covenant with Israel’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-new-covenant-with-israel/

Nonetheless the prevailing narrative among most Christians today is that the Jews of today are the offspring of Judah, and that this supposed house of Judah is the only remnant of racial Israelites left in the world.

This of course puzzles many people, for these Jews have historically been enemies of Christianity and every bastion of Christian morality in the West. Could the elect people chosen by God truly be a race of usurers, pornography producers, human traffickers, blasphemers, blood drinkers, thieves, and ritual murderers?

https://christogenea.org/podcasts/protocols-of-satan

https://christogenea.org/articles/jewish-ritual-murder

A woodcut from the Nuremberg Chronicle depicting the ritual murder of an Italian boy.

Most certainly not. The Jews of today are neither Judahites nor Israelites but are a racial conglomeration of Kenites, Canaanites and Edomites. They are primarily descended from the Edomites who were conquered converted and integrated into Judaea in 125 BC by John Hyrcanus.

This is attested to in Josephus’ Antiquities of the Judeans, (13:257-258, 13:395-397 et al.) and Strabo’s Geography (book 16) as well as later sources such as the Biblical Encyclopedia, Vol. 2. Here are a few notable references:

“257Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of Idumea [formerly cities of Manasseh and Judah respectively], and subdued all the Idumeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would circumcise their genitals, and make use of the laws of the Judeans; 258and they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers, that they submitted to the use of circumcision, and of the rest of the Judean ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, that they were hereafter no other than Judeans.”
-Josephus, Antiquities of the Judeans, 13.257-258

“34 As for Judaea, its western extremities towards Casius are occupied by the Idumaeans and by the lake. The Idumaeans are Nabataeans, but owing to a sedition they were banished from there, joined the Judaeans, and shared in the same customs with them.”
-Strabo, Geography, 16.2.34

“Indeed the Edomites later became completely absorbed in Jewry and under their aggressive intrusion the Jews became racially the medium of expression for the Edomite ideal for which Herod the Great had first given political formation. The Edomite intrusion into Judaism at every historical point of contact is fully discussed in the volumes of the Cambridge Ancient History.”
-Biblica Encyclopedia, vol. 2, col. 1187

‘The Arrest of Christ’ -Hans Holbein the Elder.

King Herod and the entire Herodian dynasty were Edomites by race, and this is affirmed many times in the writings of Flavius Josephus (Antiquities 14.3, 12.8 et al.). These Edomites had risen to the peaks of power in Judaea through murder of the Hasmonean dynasty and by bribing Mark Antony.

These Edomites were ancestral foes of Israel who had mingled with the cursed Canaanites who in turn had mingled with the Kenites (the offspring of Cain and the mysterious women of Nod), the Rephaim (giants descended from the Nephilim), the Kadmonites, the Perizzites and other cursed tribes without a lineage from Seth.

‘Adam: The Patriarch of One Race’ https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/adam-the-patriarch-of-one-race/

‘The Origins of the Serpent Seed’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-origins-of-the-serpent-seed/

‘The Origins of the Non-Adamic Races’
https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/02/02/the-origins-of-the-non-adamic-races/

For an understanding of where God stands concerning Esau-Edom see Malachi 1:2-3 and the book of Obadiah. The Edomites are one of the most cursed tribes of Scripture and their eventual utter destruction is prophecied throughout the writings of the prophets.

‘Christ Mocked (The Crowning with Thorns)’
–Pietro della Vecchia

The Edomites descended from Abraham’s race-mixing grandson Esau, and on their maternal side they descended from a conglomeration of non-Adamic tribes which the Edomites had been joined to since their first generation. Esau-Edom had fallen from a high place as the firstborn of Isaac to a lowly place as the most despised nation of Scripture because of his fornication.

‘Fornication, Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation’ https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/03/06/fornication-adultery-and-idolatry-a-biblical-case-against-miscegenation/

The Edomites were of a vile spirit after their profane, idolatrous fornicating ancestors and so they would naturally be opposed to the gospel of Christ, but they had other reasons for despising Christ’s ministry.

The Edomites had only recently solidified their power in Judaea but were well on their way to complete racial and political domination. Esau has long coveted Jacob’s covenant with God, and has constantly sought to do harm to Israel.

“41And Esau was angry with Jacob because of the blessing, with which his father blessed him; and Esau said in his mind, Let the days of my father’s mourning draw nigh, that I may slay my brother Jacob.”
-Genesis 27

A religious reformation in Judaea threatened their newly found dominance of Judaeanism and all they had murdered and bribed to achieve. Thus these infiltrators were zealous enemies of Christ and his followers by necessity.

These Edomitish enemies of Christ are the false Judaeans which John warned the assembly at Smyrna about in Revelation 2.9 and 3.9:

“I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Judeans, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.”
-Revelation 2.9

“Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Judeans, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.”
-Revelation 3.9

There is only one people who gathers in synagogues and who claim to be Judaeans. Thus the identity of the guilty party is obvious.

‘The Judas Kiss’ -Gustave Dore.

Throughout the New Testament these Edomite Judaeans are referred to as “offspring (Strong’s G1081) of vipers” (Matthew 3:7, Luke 3.7, Matthew 23:33 etc.). This is a clear reference to Genesis 3.15:

“15 I will put enmities between thee (the serpent) and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel.”
-Genesis 3

In Matthew 23.35 Christ accuses their race (genean, Strong’s G1074) of the spilled blood of Abel:

“29 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,

30 And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.

31 Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.

32 Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.

33 Ye serpents, ye offspring [G1081] of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

34 Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:

35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.

36 Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this brood [genean, G1074].”
-Matthew 23

‘The Crucifixion’, the Stammheim Missal.

The Scriptures do not inform us of how the prophets each died, but on occasions when the priests of God are murdered we see characters such as Jezebel the Canaanitess or Doeg the Edomite responsible.

Christ holds their race responsible for all the righteous blood shed upon the earth from Abel unto Zacharias, the father of John the Baptist. This links one race from Cain in Eden to the 1st century Judaeans.

Christ was speaking to the scribes and Pharisees. The Pharisees were a mix of Israelites and Edomites like the rest of the 1st century Judaeans, but the scribes may have had among them Kenites, as some Kenites (sons of Cain) had been employed as scribes by the Judahites even before the Edomites began to be absorbed into Judaea (1 Chronicles 2.55).

Even in more ancient times the Israelite tribes of Judah, Benjamin and Levi that would form the Kingdom of Judah had struggled with miscegenation and cohabitation with the Kenites and Canaanites. In Genesis 38.1-5 we read that Judah married Shuah, a Canaanitess who bore him three mongrel sons, Er, Onan and Shelah. While Er and Onan were both slain by God, Shelah lived and his descendants remained among Judah as we see in Numbers 26.20.

Only thanks to the wit of Tamar did Judah have Adamic posterity and we see that the sons of Tamar were counted as the first and second born of Judah. This is despite the fact that Shelah was their elder brother, proving the illegitimate status of the Canaanite mongrel. In Judges 1.16-21 we find that Moses erred in marrying a Kenite woman and that the Kenites dwelt in the South of the land of Judah. There we also see that the Canaanite tribe of the Jebusites settled among the tribe of Benjamin in Jerusalem and we find in Joshua 15.63 that these Jebusites remained there.

‘The Arrest of Christ and the Kiss of Judas’
-Lippo Memmi.

It is now necessary to make a small digression concerning the relatives of Moses. There is some confusion among Biblical scholars concerning certain names found in the Old Testament applied to Moses’ relatives. In the book of Exodus we read of Moses’ father-in-law, the priest of Midian (Exodus 2.16-18), and a Midianite by race (Numbers 10.29). In their strict adherence to the Masoretic Text of the Jews many scholars have errantly associated Jethro the Midianite with another figure; Moses’ Kenite father in law. This has led to many confused attempts to explain how Jethro could be both a Midianite and a Kenite. They also try to assign three different names found in the Masoretic Text to the single figure of Jethro which seems quite implausible.

In truth Jethro was only known by one other name; Raguel. This is evident in Exodus 2.16-18 in the Septuagint where he is refered to by both names in the same passage and Numbers 10.29 where Raguel is called the father in law of Moses and a Midianite. In Numbers 10.29 in the Masoretic Text and the Vulgate Jethro/Raguel is named as the father of Hobab. At Judges 4.11 in the Masoretic Text Hobab is refered to as a Kenite and the father in law of Moses. One might conclude based on this that Jethro was also a Kenite and known by a third name, Hobab, but this is in conflict with the fact that Jethro is elsewhere refered to as a Midianite. The reconciliation is to be found in the Septuagint where Judges 4.11 has Jobab and not Hobab, thus we may conclude that the Hobab descended from Jethro/Raguel was a Midianite and unrelated to this Jobab the Kenite whose daughter Moses errantly wed.

The Kenites had become absorbed into the Canaanite nations at an early time, and Esau-Edom had become absorbed partially into the Canaanites, thus all three tribal groups carried some of Cain’s DNA. It is also likely that many of the Judaean elders were Canaanites themselves (Zechariah 14.21, Susanna 1.56) and so it’s possible all three cursed lineages had direct descendants in the 1st century Judaean populace, particularly among scribes and Pharisees. Thus Christ rightly accuses their brood of shedding the blood of Abel and Zacharias, and of all the righteous priests of God.

‘Massacre of the Innocents’
-Matteo di Giovanni

In John chapter 8 Christ tells this race in no uncertain terms that they are descended from the Devil:

“38 I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.

39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father [the Edomites and bastardized Judahites indeed descended paternally from Abraham]. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.

41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.

42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.

43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my Word.

44 Ye are of your father the Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”
-John 8

‘Christ Before Caiaphas’ -Albrecht Durer.

After Jesus states that they have a different father than his own and that theirs is the Devil these Judaeans are immediately defensive saying “we are not born of fornication”. This indicates that they well knew that he was referring to their ancestry. He continues to affirm his accusation by saying that their father is the father of lies and a murderer from the beginning. These Judaean’s denial of their bastardized heritage in verse 41 is a reference to Malachi 2 where we find that Judah has married the daughter of a strange God.

“10Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why then doth every one of us despise his brother, violating the covenant of our fathers?

11Juda hath transgressed, and abomination hath been committed in Israel, and in Jerusalem: for Juda hath profaned the holiness of the Lord, which he loved, and hath married the daughter of a strange god.

12The Lord will cut off the man that hath done this, both the master, and the scholar, out of the tabernacles of Jacob, and him that offereth an offering to the Lord of hosts.”
-Malachi 2

‘The Kiss of Judas’ -Ary Scheffer.

This of course refers to the mingling of the sons of Judah with the daughters of Canaan who indeed descended in part from the devil’s brood. Thus Jesus rightly tells them they do the deeds of their father the devil. One may descend paternally from the patriarchs but if one is born of fornication they are cut off and belong to the devil.

‘Fornication, Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation’ https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/03/06/fornication-adultery-and-idolatry-a-biblical-case-against-miscegenation/

In Romans chapter 9 Paul discusses these circumstances concerning the Edomites at some length. He first expresses his concern “for the brethren” his “kinsmen in regards to the flesh: those who are Israelites” in verses 1-5.

“I speak the truth among the Anointed, I lie not, my conscience bearing witness with me in the Holy Spirit, 2 that grief for me is great, and distress incessant in my heart, 3 for I have prayed that I myself would be accursed from the Anointed for the brethren, my kinsmen in regards to the flesh; 4 those who are Israelites, whose is the position of sons, and the honor, and the covenants, and the legislation, and the service, and the promises; 5 whose are the fathers; and of whom are the Anointed in regards to the flesh, being over all blessed of God for the ages. Truly.”
-Romans 9

He then goes on to say that “not all those who are from Israel are those of Israel” in verse 6 and relates this to the enduring posterity of Isaac which was found not in Esau but Jacob who diligently sought a Shemitic wife while Esau married Canaanites.

Da Vinci’s ‘The Last Supper’
-Giacomo Raffaelli.

“34And Esau was forty years old; and he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beoch the Chettite, and Basemath, daughter of Helon the Chettite. 35And they were provoking to Isaac and Rebecca.”
-Genesis 26

In his epistle to the Hebrews St. Paul describes Esau as a fornicator and profane person. His act of fornication was miscegenation and he is never recorded as having had extramarital or incestuous sexual relations. Rather his marriages themselves were condemned because his wives were taken of the mongrel Canaanites.

“14 Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:

15 Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled;

16 Lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.”
-Hebrews 12

Rebecca was so distraught she saw no worth in her life if Jacob would marry racial aliens like Esau did.

“46And Rebecca said to Isaac, I am weary of my life, because of the daughters of the sons of Chet; if Jacob shall take a wife of the daughters of this land, wherefore should I live?”
-Genesis 27

At Isaac’s behest Jacob went to his uncle Laban (meaning “White”) in Mesopotamia to find a kindred wife who would bear the children of the promise.

“1And Isaac having called for Jacob, blessed him, and charged him, saying, Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of the Chananites. 2Rise and depart quickly into Mesopotamia, to the house of Bathuel the father of thy mother, and take to thyself thence a wife of the daughters of Laban thy mother’s brother. 3And may my God bless thee, and increase thee, and multiply thee, and thou shalt become gatherings of nations.”
-Genesis 28

‘The Mockery of Christ’ -Ol auf Holz.

The children of the flesh in verse 8 are contrasted with the children of the promise which the following verses show to be inherited by birth through Isaac and Jacob.

“6 Not, however, that the word of God has failed; since not all those who are from Israel are those of Israel: 7 nor because they are offspring of Abraham all children: but, “In Isaac will your offspring be called.” 8 That is to say, the children of the flesh, these are not children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring. 9 Indeed this word of promise: “At the appointed time I will come, and there will be a son for Sarah.” 10 And not only, but Rebecca also had conceived from one, by Isaac our father. 11 Then not yet having been born, nor having performed any good or evil, (that the purpose of God concerning the chosen endures, not from rituals, but from the calling,) 12 to her it was said, “the elder will serve the younger:” 13 just as it is written, “Jacob I love, and Esau I hated.”
-Romans 9

Some will say that those who Paul says are not of Israel in the land of Israel are actually just Israelites whose status as such has been revoked on account of disbelief, but another passage of Romans refutes this notion.

“25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the nations be come in.

26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:

27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.

28 As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the father’s sakes.

29 For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.”
-Romans 11

So we see that even those Israelites who reject the Gospel are still beloved for the father’s sakes and are not cast off from the election. Thus those in Israel who are not of Israel can only be the Edomite and Kenite infiltrators.

‘Judas Iscariot’ -Andre Duterte.

He continues to contrast Jacob-Israel and Esau-Edom in the following verses of chapter 9. In verse 22 he calls these Edomites and other enemies of God “vessels fit for destruction”. Clearly Paul well knew the heritage of his Edomite adversaries.

In 1 John 2 John warns his readers of the anti-Christs. Notice that the anti-Christs have already been born (ginomai, G1096) and that they came out from us but were not of us. This perfectly describes the Kenites, Edomites and mixed Judaeans. These came out from Eve, Abraham, Isaac and even Judah, Benjamin and Levi, but were not truly of us on account of their spurious origins. Of course these anti-Christs deny that Jesus is the Christ and so deny the Father and the Son. To this day their denial defines their Satanic ethno-religion.

“18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now many antichrists have been born; whereby we know that it is the last time.

19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.

20 But ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know all things.

21 I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it, and that no lie is of the truth.

22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.”
-1 John 2

‘The Kiss of Judas’ -Ol auf Holz.

It is evident in numerous places all throughout the prophets and the New Testament that trees, vines and other plant life symbolize people, families, nations and races. I hope to have established this idiom in other writings.

‘The Origins of the Serpent Seed’ https://teknatoutheou.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-origins-of-the-serpent-seed/

Jeremiah prophecied of the corruption of the stock of Judaea in chapter 24. Here the prophet refers to the Edomites and halfbreeds of Judaea as “bad figs” and the Israelites of Judaea as “good figs”.

“1The Lord shewed me two baskets of figs, lying in front of the temple of the Lord, after Nabuchodonosor king of Babylon had carried captive Jechonias son of Joakim king of Juda, and the princes, and the artificers, and the prisoners, and the rich men out of Jerusalem, and had brought them to Babylon. 2The one basket was full of very good figs, as the early figs; and the other basket was full of very bad figs, which could not be eaten, for their badness. 3And the Lord said to me, What seest thou, Jeremias? and I said, Figs; the good figs, very good; and the bad, very bad, which cannot be eaten, for their badness.

4And the word of the Lord came to me, saying, 5Thus saith the Lord, the God of Israel; As these good figs, so will I acknowledge the Judeans that have been carried away captive, whom I have sent forth out of this place into the land of the Chaldeans for good. 6And I will fix mine eyes upon them for good, and I will restore them into this land for good: and I will build them up, and not pull them down; and I will plant them, and not pluck them up. 7And I will give them a heart to know me, that I am the Lord: and they shall be to me a people, and I will be to them a God: for they shall turn to me with all their heart.

8And as the bad figs, which cannot be eaten, for their badness; thus saith the Lord, So will I deliver Sedekias king of Juda, and his nobles, and the remnant of Jerusalem, them that are left in this land, and the dwellers in Egypt. 9And I will cause them to be dispersed into all the kingdoms of the earth, and they shall be for a reproach, and a proverb, and an object of hatred, and a curse, in every place whither I have driven them out.”
-Jeremiah 24